Cargando…
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential of CA to benefit AF patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain. HYPOTHESIS: CA may be safe and effective for patients with HFpEF. METHODS: The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35544952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23841 |
_version_ | 1784747985814421504 |
---|---|
author | Gu, Gaoyang Wu, Jing Gao, Xiaofei Liu, Meijun Jin, Chaolun Xu, Yizhou |
author_facet | Gu, Gaoyang Wu, Jing Gao, Xiaofei Liu, Meijun Jin, Chaolun Xu, Yizhou |
author_sort | Gu, Gaoyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential of CA to benefit AF patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain. HYPOTHESIS: CA may be safe and effective for patients with HFpEF. METHODS: The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating CA for AF patients with HFpEF. RESULTS: A total of seven trials with 1696 patients were included. Pooled analyses demonstrated similar procedure and fluoroscopy time regarding the use of CA for patients with HFpEF and without HF (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.01–0.81, p = .05 and [WMD: 0.05; 95% CI: −0.18–0.28, p = .68]). Moreover, CA was effective in maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with HFpEF and noninferior for patients without HF [risk ratio (RR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76–1.10, p = .34). Additionally, CA tended to significantly maintain SR (RR: 4.73; 95% CI: 1.86–12.03, p = .001) and reduce rehospitalization for HF compared with medical therapy (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19–0.71, p = .003). However, no significant differences were found between two groups regarding the mortality rate (p = .59). CONCLUSION: CA is a potential treatment strategy for patients with HFpEF and demonstrates equivalent efficacy to that of patients without HF. Moreover, the benefits of CA in maintaining SR and reducing rehospitalization of HF patients were significantly better than those of medical therapy. Additional randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9286329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92863292022-07-19 Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis Gu, Gaoyang Wu, Jing Gao, Xiaofei Liu, Meijun Jin, Chaolun Xu, Yizhou Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential of CA to benefit AF patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain. HYPOTHESIS: CA may be safe and effective for patients with HFpEF. METHODS: The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating CA for AF patients with HFpEF. RESULTS: A total of seven trials with 1696 patients were included. Pooled analyses demonstrated similar procedure and fluoroscopy time regarding the use of CA for patients with HFpEF and without HF (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.01–0.81, p = .05 and [WMD: 0.05; 95% CI: −0.18–0.28, p = .68]). Moreover, CA was effective in maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with HFpEF and noninferior for patients without HF [risk ratio (RR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76–1.10, p = .34). Additionally, CA tended to significantly maintain SR (RR: 4.73; 95% CI: 1.86–12.03, p = .001) and reduce rehospitalization for HF compared with medical therapy (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19–0.71, p = .003). However, no significant differences were found between two groups regarding the mortality rate (p = .59). CONCLUSION: CA is a potential treatment strategy for patients with HFpEF and demonstrates equivalent efficacy to that of patients without HF. Moreover, the benefits of CA in maintaining SR and reducing rehospitalization of HF patients were significantly better than those of medical therapy. Additional randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9286329/ /pubmed/35544952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23841 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Gu, Gaoyang Wu, Jing Gao, Xiaofei Liu, Meijun Jin, Chaolun Xu, Yizhou Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis |
title | Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis |
title_full | Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis |
title_short | Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis |
title_sort | catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35544952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23841 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gugaoyang catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis AT wujing catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis AT gaoxiaofei catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis AT liumeijun catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis AT jinchaolun catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis AT xuyizhou catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis |