Cargando…

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential of CA to benefit AF patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain. HYPOTHESIS: CA may be safe and effective for patients with HFpEF. METHODS: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Gaoyang, Wu, Jing, Gao, Xiaofei, Liu, Meijun, Jin, Chaolun, Xu, Yizhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35544952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23841
_version_ 1784747985814421504
author Gu, Gaoyang
Wu, Jing
Gao, Xiaofei
Liu, Meijun
Jin, Chaolun
Xu, Yizhou
author_facet Gu, Gaoyang
Wu, Jing
Gao, Xiaofei
Liu, Meijun
Jin, Chaolun
Xu, Yizhou
author_sort Gu, Gaoyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential of CA to benefit AF patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain. HYPOTHESIS: CA may be safe and effective for patients with HFpEF. METHODS: The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating CA for AF patients with HFpEF. RESULTS: A total of seven trials with 1696 patients were included. Pooled analyses demonstrated similar procedure and fluoroscopy time regarding the use of CA for patients with HFpEF and without HF (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.01–0.81, p = .05 and [WMD: 0.05; 95% CI: −0.18–0.28, p = .68]). Moreover, CA was effective in maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with HFpEF and noninferior for patients without HF [risk ratio (RR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76–1.10, p = .34). Additionally, CA tended to significantly maintain SR (RR: 4.73; 95% CI: 1.86–12.03, p = .001) and reduce rehospitalization for HF compared with medical therapy (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19–0.71, p = .003). However, no significant differences were found between two groups regarding the mortality rate (p = .59). CONCLUSION: CA is a potential treatment strategy for patients with HFpEF and demonstrates equivalent efficacy to that of patients without HF. Moreover, the benefits of CA in maintaining SR and reducing rehospitalization of HF patients were significantly better than those of medical therapy. Additional randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9286329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92863292022-07-19 Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis Gu, Gaoyang Wu, Jing Gao, Xiaofei Liu, Meijun Jin, Chaolun Xu, Yizhou Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential of CA to benefit AF patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain. HYPOTHESIS: CA may be safe and effective for patients with HFpEF. METHODS: The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating CA for AF patients with HFpEF. RESULTS: A total of seven trials with 1696 patients were included. Pooled analyses demonstrated similar procedure and fluoroscopy time regarding the use of CA for patients with HFpEF and without HF (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.01–0.81, p = .05 and [WMD: 0.05; 95% CI: −0.18–0.28, p = .68]). Moreover, CA was effective in maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with HFpEF and noninferior for patients without HF [risk ratio (RR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76–1.10, p = .34). Additionally, CA tended to significantly maintain SR (RR: 4.73; 95% CI: 1.86–12.03, p = .001) and reduce rehospitalization for HF compared with medical therapy (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19–0.71, p = .003). However, no significant differences were found between two groups regarding the mortality rate (p = .59). CONCLUSION: CA is a potential treatment strategy for patients with HFpEF and demonstrates equivalent efficacy to that of patients without HF. Moreover, the benefits of CA in maintaining SR and reducing rehospitalization of HF patients were significantly better than those of medical therapy. Additional randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9286329/ /pubmed/35544952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23841 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Gu, Gaoyang
Wu, Jing
Gao, Xiaofei
Liu, Meijun
Jin, Chaolun
Xu, Yizhou
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis
title Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis
title_full Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis
title_short Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta‐analysis
title_sort catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a meta‐analysis
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35544952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23841
work_keys_str_mv AT gugaoyang catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis
AT wujing catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis
AT gaoxiaofei catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis
AT liumeijun catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis
AT jinchaolun catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis
AT xuyizhou catheterablationofatrialfibrillationinpatientswithheartfailureandpreservedejectionfractionametaanalysis