Cargando…

Characterization of selected organometallic compounds by electrospray ionization‐ and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐mass spectrometry using different types of instruments: Possibilities and limitations

RATIONALE: Organometallic compounds are becoming increasingly important in their industrial application as catalysts. Mass spectrometry is an essential tool for the structural confirmation of such organometallics. Because the analysis of this class of molecules can be challenging, the ionization beh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleissner, Sarah, Pittenauer, Ernst, Pecak, Jan, Kirchner, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35229369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9281
_version_ 1784747991578443776
author Fleissner, Sarah
Pittenauer, Ernst
Pecak, Jan
Kirchner, Karl
author_facet Fleissner, Sarah
Pittenauer, Ernst
Pecak, Jan
Kirchner, Karl
author_sort Fleissner, Sarah
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Organometallic compounds are becoming increasingly important in their industrial application as catalysts. Mass spectrometry is an essential tool for the structural confirmation of such organometallics. Because the analysis of this class of molecules can be challenging, the ionization behavior and structural confirmation of selected transition metal catalysts are described in this work. METHODS: The transition metal catalysts investigated were analyzed using classical vacuum MALDI reflectron TOF‐MS as well as intermediate pressure matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI QTOF‐MS). Obtained mass spectra were compared with electrospray ionization MS (ESI‐MS) already established for organometallic compounds, utilizing a QTOF mass spectrometer here. In addition, various sample preparations, including two selected MALDI matrices (trans‐2‐[3‐(4‐tert‐butylphenyl)‐2‐methyl‐2‐propenylidene]malononitrile and 2,2′:5′,2″‐terthiophene) with different solvent combinations for MALDI‐MS measurements, were investigated in detail with respect to their correct isotope distribution of the molecular ions observed. RESULTS: All investigated organometallic compounds were successfully identified by vacuum and intermediate pressure MALDI‐MS. Accurate masses of ions related to molecular ion species (e.g., [M‐Cl](+), [M](+), and [M + Na](+)) could be determined by MALDI QTOF‐MS measurements with a mass error of less than ±5 ppm for all compounds. Both investigated MALDI matrices performed equally on both instruments. The impact of the analyte/matrix solvent mixtures turned out to be crucial for a successful analysis of the investigated compounds. In contrast, ESI QTOF‐MS yielded masses of ions related to molecular ion species in favorable cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MALDI‐MS for the structural confirmation of organometallic compounds is still not widely used. Nevertheless, this work showed that this analytical technique does have some benefits. The analysis of neutral catalysts proves to be quite useful, concluding that this technique provides a complement and/or an alternative to ESI‐MS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9286352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92863522022-07-19 Characterization of selected organometallic compounds by electrospray ionization‐ and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐mass spectrometry using different types of instruments: Possibilities and limitations Fleissner, Sarah Pittenauer, Ernst Pecak, Jan Kirchner, Karl Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Research Articles RATIONALE: Organometallic compounds are becoming increasingly important in their industrial application as catalysts. Mass spectrometry is an essential tool for the structural confirmation of such organometallics. Because the analysis of this class of molecules can be challenging, the ionization behavior and structural confirmation of selected transition metal catalysts are described in this work. METHODS: The transition metal catalysts investigated were analyzed using classical vacuum MALDI reflectron TOF‐MS as well as intermediate pressure matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI QTOF‐MS). Obtained mass spectra were compared with electrospray ionization MS (ESI‐MS) already established for organometallic compounds, utilizing a QTOF mass spectrometer here. In addition, various sample preparations, including two selected MALDI matrices (trans‐2‐[3‐(4‐tert‐butylphenyl)‐2‐methyl‐2‐propenylidene]malononitrile and 2,2′:5′,2″‐terthiophene) with different solvent combinations for MALDI‐MS measurements, were investigated in detail with respect to their correct isotope distribution of the molecular ions observed. RESULTS: All investigated organometallic compounds were successfully identified by vacuum and intermediate pressure MALDI‐MS. Accurate masses of ions related to molecular ion species (e.g., [M‐Cl](+), [M](+), and [M + Na](+)) could be determined by MALDI QTOF‐MS measurements with a mass error of less than ±5 ppm for all compounds. Both investigated MALDI matrices performed equally on both instruments. The impact of the analyte/matrix solvent mixtures turned out to be crucial for a successful analysis of the investigated compounds. In contrast, ESI QTOF‐MS yielded masses of ions related to molecular ion species in favorable cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MALDI‐MS for the structural confirmation of organometallic compounds is still not widely used. Nevertheless, this work showed that this analytical technique does have some benefits. The analysis of neutral catalysts proves to be quite useful, concluding that this technique provides a complement and/or an alternative to ESI‐MS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-21 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9286352/ /pubmed/35229369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9281 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Fleissner, Sarah
Pittenauer, Ernst
Pecak, Jan
Kirchner, Karl
Characterization of selected organometallic compounds by electrospray ionization‐ and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐mass spectrometry using different types of instruments: Possibilities and limitations
title Characterization of selected organometallic compounds by electrospray ionization‐ and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐mass spectrometry using different types of instruments: Possibilities and limitations
title_full Characterization of selected organometallic compounds by electrospray ionization‐ and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐mass spectrometry using different types of instruments: Possibilities and limitations
title_fullStr Characterization of selected organometallic compounds by electrospray ionization‐ and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐mass spectrometry using different types of instruments: Possibilities and limitations
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of selected organometallic compounds by electrospray ionization‐ and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐mass spectrometry using different types of instruments: Possibilities and limitations
title_short Characterization of selected organometallic compounds by electrospray ionization‐ and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐mass spectrometry using different types of instruments: Possibilities and limitations
title_sort characterization of selected organometallic compounds by electrospray ionization‐ and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐mass spectrometry using different types of instruments: possibilities and limitations
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35229369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9281
work_keys_str_mv AT fleissnersarah characterizationofselectedorganometalliccompoundsbyelectrosprayionizationandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationmassspectrometryusingdifferenttypesofinstrumentspossibilitiesandlimitations
AT pittenauerernst characterizationofselectedorganometalliccompoundsbyelectrosprayionizationandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationmassspectrometryusingdifferenttypesofinstrumentspossibilitiesandlimitations
AT pecakjan characterizationofselectedorganometalliccompoundsbyelectrosprayionizationandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationmassspectrometryusingdifferenttypesofinstrumentspossibilitiesandlimitations
AT kirchnerkarl characterizationofselectedorganometalliccompoundsbyelectrosprayionizationandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationmassspectrometryusingdifferenttypesofinstrumentspossibilitiesandlimitations