Cargando…

Face‐Processing Differences Present in Grapheme‐Color Synesthetes

Grapheme‐color synesthesia is a heterogeneous neurological phenomenon whereby the experience of a grapheme automatically and involuntarily elicits an experience of color. While the majority of synesthesia research has focused on inducer‐specific influences of synesthetic associations, more recent ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mannix, Thea, Sørensen, Thomas Alrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13130
_version_ 1784748056937234432
author Mannix, Thea
Sørensen, Thomas Alrik
author_facet Mannix, Thea
Sørensen, Thomas Alrik
author_sort Mannix, Thea
collection PubMed
description Grapheme‐color synesthesia is a heterogeneous neurological phenomenon whereby the experience of a grapheme automatically and involuntarily elicits an experience of color. While the majority of synesthesia research has focused on inducer‐specific influences of synesthetic associations, more recent efforts have examined potential broader differences. Based on spontaneous reports from synesthetes detailing problems with face recognition, in conjunction with the geographical proximity of neurological regions relevant to both synesthesia and face processing, we sought to examine whether synesthetes demonstrated atypical face‐processing abilities. A total of 16 grapheme‐color synesthetes and 16 age‐and‐gender matched controls (±3 years) completed the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT; Duchaine & Nakayama, 2006) of face memory, the Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Task (VHPT‐F; Richler, Floyd, & Gauthier, 2014) of holistic face processing, as well as a standardized self‐report questionnaire the Faces and Emotions Questionnaire (Freeman, Palermo, & Brock, 2015). The results revealed significantly poorer performance in synesthete's ability to recognize faces in the CFMT that was driven by a reduction in upright advantage. Results also revealed a significant reduction in overall accuracy on the VHPT‐F for synesthetes, who despite this displayed a comparable holistic processing advantage compared to matched controls. Finally, synesthetes also rated themselves as significantly worse at face recognition. We suggest that this pattern may reflect differences in the development of individualized perceptual strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9286625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92866252022-07-19 Face‐Processing Differences Present in Grapheme‐Color Synesthetes Mannix, Thea Sørensen, Thomas Alrik Cogn Sci Regular Article Grapheme‐color synesthesia is a heterogeneous neurological phenomenon whereby the experience of a grapheme automatically and involuntarily elicits an experience of color. While the majority of synesthesia research has focused on inducer‐specific influences of synesthetic associations, more recent efforts have examined potential broader differences. Based on spontaneous reports from synesthetes detailing problems with face recognition, in conjunction with the geographical proximity of neurological regions relevant to both synesthesia and face processing, we sought to examine whether synesthetes demonstrated atypical face‐processing abilities. A total of 16 grapheme‐color synesthetes and 16 age‐and‐gender matched controls (±3 years) completed the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT; Duchaine & Nakayama, 2006) of face memory, the Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Task (VHPT‐F; Richler, Floyd, & Gauthier, 2014) of holistic face processing, as well as a standardized self‐report questionnaire the Faces and Emotions Questionnaire (Freeman, Palermo, & Brock, 2015). The results revealed significantly poorer performance in synesthete's ability to recognize faces in the CFMT that was driven by a reduction in upright advantage. Results also revealed a significant reduction in overall accuracy on the VHPT‐F for synesthetes, who despite this displayed a comparable holistic processing advantage compared to matched controls. Finally, synesthetes also rated themselves as significantly worse at face recognition. We suggest that this pattern may reflect differences in the development of individualized perceptual strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-12 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9286625/ /pubmed/35411960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13130 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Cognitive Science Society (CSS). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Mannix, Thea
Sørensen, Thomas Alrik
Face‐Processing Differences Present in Grapheme‐Color Synesthetes
title Face‐Processing Differences Present in Grapheme‐Color Synesthetes
title_full Face‐Processing Differences Present in Grapheme‐Color Synesthetes
title_fullStr Face‐Processing Differences Present in Grapheme‐Color Synesthetes
title_full_unstemmed Face‐Processing Differences Present in Grapheme‐Color Synesthetes
title_short Face‐Processing Differences Present in Grapheme‐Color Synesthetes
title_sort face‐processing differences present in grapheme‐color synesthetes
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13130
work_keys_str_mv AT mannixthea faceprocessingdifferencespresentingraphemecolorsynesthetes
AT sørensenthomasalrik faceprocessingdifferencespresentingraphemecolorsynesthetes