Cargando…
The Illumination of Thunderclouds by Lightning: 2. The Effect of GLM Instrument Threshold on Detection and Clustering
Lightning is measured from space using optical instruments that detect transient changes in the illumination of the cloud top. How much of the flash (if any) is recorded by the instrument depends on the instrument detection threshold. NOAA's Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) employs a dynami...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35865260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001943 |
_version_ | 1784748069647024128 |
---|---|
author | Peterson, Michael Light, Tracy E. L. Mach, Douglas |
author_facet | Peterson, Michael Light, Tracy E. L. Mach, Douglas |
author_sort | Peterson, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lightning is measured from space using optical instruments that detect transient changes in the illumination of the cloud top. How much of the flash (if any) is recorded by the instrument depends on the instrument detection threshold. NOAA's Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) employs a dynamic threshold that varies across the imaging array and changes over time. This causes flashes in certain regions and at night to be recorded in greater detail than other flashes, and threshold inconsistencies will impose biases on all levels of GLM data products. In this study, we quantify the impact of the varying GLM threshold on event/group/flash detection, flash clustering, and gridded product generation by imposing artificial thresholds on the event data taken from a thunderstorm with a low instrument threshold (∼0.7 fJ). We find that even modest increases in threshold severely impact event (60% loss by 2 fJ, 90% loss by 10 fJ) and group (25% loss by 2 fJ, 81% loss by 10 fJ) detection by suppressing faint illumination of the cloud top from weak sources and scattering. Flash detection is impacted less by threshold increases (4% loss by 2 fJ), but reductions are still significant at higher thresholds (35% loss by 10 fJ, or 44% if single‐group flashes are removed). Undetected pulses cause individual flashes to be split and severely impact the construction of gridded products. All of these factors complicate the interpretation of GLM data, particularly when trended over time under a changing threshold. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9286675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92866752022-07-19 The Illumination of Thunderclouds by Lightning: 2. The Effect of GLM Instrument Threshold on Detection and Clustering Peterson, Michael Light, Tracy E. L. Mach, Douglas Earth Space Sci Research Article Lightning is measured from space using optical instruments that detect transient changes in the illumination of the cloud top. How much of the flash (if any) is recorded by the instrument depends on the instrument detection threshold. NOAA's Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) employs a dynamic threshold that varies across the imaging array and changes over time. This causes flashes in certain regions and at night to be recorded in greater detail than other flashes, and threshold inconsistencies will impose biases on all levels of GLM data products. In this study, we quantify the impact of the varying GLM threshold on event/group/flash detection, flash clustering, and gridded product generation by imposing artificial thresholds on the event data taken from a thunderstorm with a low instrument threshold (∼0.7 fJ). We find that even modest increases in threshold severely impact event (60% loss by 2 fJ, 90% loss by 10 fJ) and group (25% loss by 2 fJ, 81% loss by 10 fJ) detection by suppressing faint illumination of the cloud top from weak sources and scattering. Flash detection is impacted less by threshold increases (4% loss by 2 fJ), but reductions are still significant at higher thresholds (35% loss by 10 fJ, or 44% if single‐group flashes are removed). Undetected pulses cause individual flashes to be split and severely impact the construction of gridded products. All of these factors complicate the interpretation of GLM data, particularly when trended over time under a changing threshold. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-10 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9286675/ /pubmed/35865260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001943 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peterson, Michael Light, Tracy E. L. Mach, Douglas The Illumination of Thunderclouds by Lightning: 2. The Effect of GLM Instrument Threshold on Detection and Clustering |
title | The Illumination of Thunderclouds by Lightning: 2. The Effect of GLM Instrument Threshold on Detection and Clustering |
title_full | The Illumination of Thunderclouds by Lightning: 2. The Effect of GLM Instrument Threshold on Detection and Clustering |
title_fullStr | The Illumination of Thunderclouds by Lightning: 2. The Effect of GLM Instrument Threshold on Detection and Clustering |
title_full_unstemmed | The Illumination of Thunderclouds by Lightning: 2. The Effect of GLM Instrument Threshold on Detection and Clustering |
title_short | The Illumination of Thunderclouds by Lightning: 2. The Effect of GLM Instrument Threshold on Detection and Clustering |
title_sort | illumination of thunderclouds by lightning: 2. the effect of glm instrument threshold on detection and clustering |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35865260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001943 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersonmichael theilluminationofthundercloudsbylightning2theeffectofglminstrumentthresholdondetectionandclustering AT lighttracyel theilluminationofthundercloudsbylightning2theeffectofglminstrumentthresholdondetectionandclustering AT machdouglas theilluminationofthundercloudsbylightning2theeffectofglminstrumentthresholdondetectionandclustering AT petersonmichael illuminationofthundercloudsbylightning2theeffectofglminstrumentthresholdondetectionandclustering AT lighttracyel illuminationofthundercloudsbylightning2theeffectofglminstrumentthresholdondetectionandclustering AT machdouglas illuminationofthundercloudsbylightning2theeffectofglminstrumentthresholdondetectionandclustering |