Cargando…

Clinical application and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review

Background and aims  Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is being evaluated for its potential to improve colonoscopic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly with computer-aided image classifiers. This review evaluates the clinical application and diagnostic test accuracy (D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Linda S., Perry, Evelyn, Shan, Leonard, Wilding, Helen, Connell, William, Thompson, Alexander J., Taylor, Andrew C. F., Desmond, Paul V., Holt, Bronte A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35845028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1846-0642
_version_ 1784748093789437952
author Yang, Linda S.
Perry, Evelyn
Shan, Leonard
Wilding, Helen
Connell, William
Thompson, Alexander J.
Taylor, Andrew C. F.
Desmond, Paul V.
Holt, Bronte A.
author_facet Yang, Linda S.
Perry, Evelyn
Shan, Leonard
Wilding, Helen
Connell, William
Thompson, Alexander J.
Taylor, Andrew C. F.
Desmond, Paul V.
Holt, Bronte A.
author_sort Yang, Linda S.
collection PubMed
description Background and aims  Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is being evaluated for its potential to improve colonoscopic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly with computer-aided image classifiers. This review evaluates the clinical application and diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of AI algorithms in colonoscopy for IBD. Methods  A systematic review was performed on studies evaluating AI in colonoscopy of adult patients with IBD. MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched on 28 (th) April 2021 for English language articles published between January 1, 2000 and April 28, 2021. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Diagnostic accuracy was presented as median (interquartile range). Results  Of 1029 records screened, nine studies with 7813 patients were included for review. AI was used to predict endoscopic and histologic disease activity in ulcerative colitis, and differentiation of Crohn’s disease from Behcet’s disease and intestinal tuberculosis. DTA of AI algorithms ranged between 52–91 %. The sensitivity and specificity for AI algorithms predicting endoscopic severity of disease were 78 % (range 72–83, interquartile range 5.5) and 91 % (range 86–96, interquartile range 5), respectively. Conclusions  AI has been primarily used to assess disease activity in ulcerative colitis. The diagnostic performance is promising and suggests potential for other clinical application of AI in IBD colonoscopy such as dysplasia detection. However, current evidence is limited by retrospective data and models trained on still images only. Future prospective multicenter studies with full-motion videos are needed to replicate the real-world clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9286774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92867742022-07-16 Clinical application and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review Yang, Linda S. Perry, Evelyn Shan, Leonard Wilding, Helen Connell, William Thompson, Alexander J. Taylor, Andrew C. F. Desmond, Paul V. Holt, Bronte A. Endosc Int Open Background and aims  Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is being evaluated for its potential to improve colonoscopic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly with computer-aided image classifiers. This review evaluates the clinical application and diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of AI algorithms in colonoscopy for IBD. Methods  A systematic review was performed on studies evaluating AI in colonoscopy of adult patients with IBD. MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched on 28 (th) April 2021 for English language articles published between January 1, 2000 and April 28, 2021. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Diagnostic accuracy was presented as median (interquartile range). Results  Of 1029 records screened, nine studies with 7813 patients were included for review. AI was used to predict endoscopic and histologic disease activity in ulcerative colitis, and differentiation of Crohn’s disease from Behcet’s disease and intestinal tuberculosis. DTA of AI algorithms ranged between 52–91 %. The sensitivity and specificity for AI algorithms predicting endoscopic severity of disease were 78 % (range 72–83, interquartile range 5.5) and 91 % (range 86–96, interquartile range 5), respectively. Conclusions  AI has been primarily used to assess disease activity in ulcerative colitis. The diagnostic performance is promising and suggests potential for other clinical application of AI in IBD colonoscopy such as dysplasia detection. However, current evidence is limited by retrospective data and models trained on still images only. Future prospective multicenter studies with full-motion videos are needed to replicate the real-world clinical setting. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9286774/ /pubmed/35845028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1846-0642 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Yang, Linda S.
Perry, Evelyn
Shan, Leonard
Wilding, Helen
Connell, William
Thompson, Alexander J.
Taylor, Andrew C. F.
Desmond, Paul V.
Holt, Bronte A.
Clinical application and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review
title Clinical application and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review
title_full Clinical application and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical application and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical application and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review
title_short Clinical application and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review
title_sort clinical application and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35845028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1846-0642
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglindas clinicalapplicationanddiagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceincolonoscopyforinflammatoryboweldiseasesystematicreview
AT perryevelyn clinicalapplicationanddiagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceincolonoscopyforinflammatoryboweldiseasesystematicreview
AT shanleonard clinicalapplicationanddiagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceincolonoscopyforinflammatoryboweldiseasesystematicreview
AT wildinghelen clinicalapplicationanddiagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceincolonoscopyforinflammatoryboweldiseasesystematicreview
AT connellwilliam clinicalapplicationanddiagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceincolonoscopyforinflammatoryboweldiseasesystematicreview
AT thompsonalexanderj clinicalapplicationanddiagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceincolonoscopyforinflammatoryboweldiseasesystematicreview
AT taylorandrewcf clinicalapplicationanddiagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceincolonoscopyforinflammatoryboweldiseasesystematicreview
AT desmondpaulv clinicalapplicationanddiagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceincolonoscopyforinflammatoryboweldiseasesystematicreview
AT holtbrontea clinicalapplicationanddiagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceincolonoscopyforinflammatoryboweldiseasesystematicreview