Cargando…
Toward an Account of Intuitive Time
People hold intuitive theories of the physical world, such as theories of matter, energy, and motion, in the sense that they have a coherent conceptual structure supporting a network of beliefs about the domain. It is not yet clear whether people can also be said to hold a shared intuitive theory of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35731904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13166 |
_version_ | 1784748102896320512 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Ruth Shardlow, Jack Hoerl, Christoph O'Connor, Patrick A. Fernandes, Alison S. McCormack, Teresa |
author_facet | Lee, Ruth Shardlow, Jack Hoerl, Christoph O'Connor, Patrick A. Fernandes, Alison S. McCormack, Teresa |
author_sort | Lee, Ruth |
collection | PubMed |
description | People hold intuitive theories of the physical world, such as theories of matter, energy, and motion, in the sense that they have a coherent conceptual structure supporting a network of beliefs about the domain. It is not yet clear whether people can also be said to hold a shared intuitive theory of time. Yet, philosophical debates about the metaphysical nature of time often revolve around the idea that people hold one or more “common sense” assumptions about time: that there is an objective “now”; that the past, present, and future are fundamentally different in nature; and that time passes or flows. We empirically explored the question of whether people indeed share some or all of these assumptions by asking adults to what extent they agreed with a set of brief statements about time. Across two analyses, subsets of people's beliefs about time were found consistently to covary in ways that suggested stable underlying conceptual dimensions related to aspects of the “common sense” assumptions described by philosophers. However, distinct subsets of participants showed three mutually incompatible profiles of response, the most frequent of which did not closely match all of philosophers’ claims about common sense time. These exploratory studies provide a useful starting point in attempts to characterize intuitive theories of time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9286814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92868142022-07-19 Toward an Account of Intuitive Time Lee, Ruth Shardlow, Jack Hoerl, Christoph O'Connor, Patrick A. Fernandes, Alison S. McCormack, Teresa Cogn Sci Regular Article People hold intuitive theories of the physical world, such as theories of matter, energy, and motion, in the sense that they have a coherent conceptual structure supporting a network of beliefs about the domain. It is not yet clear whether people can also be said to hold a shared intuitive theory of time. Yet, philosophical debates about the metaphysical nature of time often revolve around the idea that people hold one or more “common sense” assumptions about time: that there is an objective “now”; that the past, present, and future are fundamentally different in nature; and that time passes or flows. We empirically explored the question of whether people indeed share some or all of these assumptions by asking adults to what extent they agreed with a set of brief statements about time. Across two analyses, subsets of people's beliefs about time were found consistently to covary in ways that suggested stable underlying conceptual dimensions related to aspects of the “common sense” assumptions described by philosophers. However, distinct subsets of participants showed three mutually incompatible profiles of response, the most frequent of which did not closely match all of philosophers’ claims about common sense time. These exploratory studies provide a useful starting point in attempts to characterize intuitive theories of time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-22 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9286814/ /pubmed/35731904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13166 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Cognitive Science Society (CSS). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Lee, Ruth Shardlow, Jack Hoerl, Christoph O'Connor, Patrick A. Fernandes, Alison S. McCormack, Teresa Toward an Account of Intuitive Time |
title | Toward an Account of Intuitive Time |
title_full | Toward an Account of Intuitive Time |
title_fullStr | Toward an Account of Intuitive Time |
title_full_unstemmed | Toward an Account of Intuitive Time |
title_short | Toward an Account of Intuitive Time |
title_sort | toward an account of intuitive time |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35731904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13166 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeruth towardanaccountofintuitivetime AT shardlowjack towardanaccountofintuitivetime AT hoerlchristoph towardanaccountofintuitivetime AT oconnorpatricka towardanaccountofintuitivetime AT fernandesalisons towardanaccountofintuitivetime AT mccormackteresa towardanaccountofintuitivetime |