Cargando…

Application of plant–soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences

Plant–soil feedback (PSF) can be a major driver of plant performance in communities, and this concept can be used in selecting crop rotation sequences to maximize agricultural yields. Potential benefits of using PSF in this context include nutrient use optimization, pathogen reduction, and enhanceme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koyama, Akihiro, Dias, Teresa, Antunes, Pedro M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34870353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2501
_version_ 1784748104683094016
author Koyama, Akihiro
Dias, Teresa
Antunes, Pedro M.
author_facet Koyama, Akihiro
Dias, Teresa
Antunes, Pedro M.
author_sort Koyama, Akihiro
collection PubMed
description Plant–soil feedback (PSF) can be a major driver of plant performance in communities, and this concept can be used in selecting crop rotation sequences to maximize agricultural yields. Potential benefits of using PSF in this context include nutrient use optimization, pathogen reduction, and enhancement of mutualisms between crops and microbes. Yet the contributions of these combined mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we investigated the relative contributions of these mechanisms using five major crops commonly cultivated in rotation (alfalfa, canola, maize, soybean, and wheat) under controlled conditions. We trained soil by growing each of the five crops in a “training phase,” and then reciprocally planted the five crops in the trained soils in a “feedback phase.” To tease out soil biota from nutrient effects, we established three treatments: “control” (trained unsterilized soil used in the feedback phases), “biota” (sterilized soil in the feedback phase inoculated with soil biota from the control treatment after the training phase), and “nutrient” (sterilized soils in both phases). Plant–soil feedback for each crop was calculated by comparing the total biomass of each crop grown in soils trained by each of the four other crops (i.e., in rotation) against total biomass in self‐trained soil (i.e., monocropping). We found that PSF values varied among crop combinations in all the treatments, but such variation was the greatest in the nutrient treatment. Overall, soil biota feedback tended to be lower, whereas nutrient feedback tended to be greater compared to the unsterilized control soil, suggesting that effects of antagonistic biota outweighed those of beneficial microbes in the biota treatment, and that plants optimized nutrient uptake when the soil microbiome was absent in the nutrient treatment. Furthermore, soils in the nutrient treatment trained by the legume crops (alfalfa and soybean) tended to provide the greatest positive feedback, emphasizing the important legacy of N(2) fixers in crop rotation. Taken together, our data demonstrate how nutrients and soil biota can be integral to PSFs among crops, and that assessing PSFs under controlled conditions can serve as a basis to determine the most productive crop rotation sequences prior to field testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9286821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92868212022-07-19 Application of plant–soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences Koyama, Akihiro Dias, Teresa Antunes, Pedro M. Ecol Appl Articles Plant–soil feedback (PSF) can be a major driver of plant performance in communities, and this concept can be used in selecting crop rotation sequences to maximize agricultural yields. Potential benefits of using PSF in this context include nutrient use optimization, pathogen reduction, and enhancement of mutualisms between crops and microbes. Yet the contributions of these combined mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we investigated the relative contributions of these mechanisms using five major crops commonly cultivated in rotation (alfalfa, canola, maize, soybean, and wheat) under controlled conditions. We trained soil by growing each of the five crops in a “training phase,” and then reciprocally planted the five crops in the trained soils in a “feedback phase.” To tease out soil biota from nutrient effects, we established three treatments: “control” (trained unsterilized soil used in the feedback phases), “biota” (sterilized soil in the feedback phase inoculated with soil biota from the control treatment after the training phase), and “nutrient” (sterilized soils in both phases). Plant–soil feedback for each crop was calculated by comparing the total biomass of each crop grown in soils trained by each of the four other crops (i.e., in rotation) against total biomass in self‐trained soil (i.e., monocropping). We found that PSF values varied among crop combinations in all the treatments, but such variation was the greatest in the nutrient treatment. Overall, soil biota feedback tended to be lower, whereas nutrient feedback tended to be greater compared to the unsterilized control soil, suggesting that effects of antagonistic biota outweighed those of beneficial microbes in the biota treatment, and that plants optimized nutrient uptake when the soil microbiome was absent in the nutrient treatment. Furthermore, soils in the nutrient treatment trained by the legume crops (alfalfa and soybean) tended to provide the greatest positive feedback, emphasizing the important legacy of N(2) fixers in crop rotation. Taken together, our data demonstrate how nutrients and soil biota can be integral to PSFs among crops, and that assessing PSFs under controlled conditions can serve as a basis to determine the most productive crop rotation sequences prior to field testing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-02-06 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9286821/ /pubmed/34870353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2501 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Koyama, Akihiro
Dias, Teresa
Antunes, Pedro M.
Application of plant–soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences
title Application of plant–soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences
title_full Application of plant–soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences
title_fullStr Application of plant–soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences
title_full_unstemmed Application of plant–soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences
title_short Application of plant–soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences
title_sort application of plant–soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34870353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2501
work_keys_str_mv AT koyamaakihiro applicationofplantsoilfeedbacksintheselectionofcroprotationsequences
AT diasteresa applicationofplantsoilfeedbacksintheselectionofcroprotationsequences
AT antunespedrom applicationofplantsoilfeedbacksintheselectionofcroprotationsequences