Cargando…

Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam

PURPOSE: To compare the total corneal astigmatism (TCA) measured by IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam and to investigate the consistency of corneal keratometry (CK) measured by IOLMaster and Pentacam. METHODS: Cataract patients were retrospectively enrolled in March and April, 2021. Retrospective analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaochun, Cao, Xiaoguang, Bao, Yongzhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35845936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9236006
_version_ 1784748118575677440
author Li, Xiaochun
Cao, Xiaoguang
Bao, Yongzhen
author_facet Li, Xiaochun
Cao, Xiaoguang
Bao, Yongzhen
author_sort Li, Xiaochun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the total corneal astigmatism (TCA) measured by IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam and to investigate the consistency of corneal keratometry (CK) measured by IOLMaster and Pentacam. METHODS: Cataract patients were retrospectively enrolled in March and April, 2021. Retrospective analysis was performed on those patients with binocular and monocular CK measured by IOLMaster and Pentacam. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (204 eyes) were included, 64 of whom were female (62.75%). The flat (K1) and steep (K2) CK of anterior corneal surface (ACS) and flat (TK1) and steep (TK2) of total cornea measured with IOLMaster 700 were 44.16 ± 1.60 D, 45.09 ± 1.68 D, 44.12 ± 1.62 D, and 45.14 ± 1.69 D, respectively. Those measured with Pentacam were 44.31 ± 1.57 D, 45.22 ± 1.65 D, 44.15 ± 1.67 D, and 45.19 ± 1.82 D, respectively. The astigmatism of ACS and TCA were −0.94 ± 0.63 D and −1.02 ± 0.69 D (p < 0.01) in the IOLMaster group and −0.90 ± 0.59 D and −1.05 ± 0.81 D in the Pentacam group, respectively (p < 0.01). TCA measurement results of IOLMaster and Pentacam were consistent (Pearson = 0.710, p < 0.01), and there was no significant difference (p = 0.591). CONCLUSIONS: Total corneal astigmatism measured by IOLMaster was consistent with that measured by Pentacam. The difference between the astigmatism of anterior corneal surface and total cornea was detected in the measurement of IOLMaster and Pentacam, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9286877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92868772022-07-16 Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam Li, Xiaochun Cao, Xiaoguang Bao, Yongzhen Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the total corneal astigmatism (TCA) measured by IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam and to investigate the consistency of corneal keratometry (CK) measured by IOLMaster and Pentacam. METHODS: Cataract patients were retrospectively enrolled in March and April, 2021. Retrospective analysis was performed on those patients with binocular and monocular CK measured by IOLMaster and Pentacam. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (204 eyes) were included, 64 of whom were female (62.75%). The flat (K1) and steep (K2) CK of anterior corneal surface (ACS) and flat (TK1) and steep (TK2) of total cornea measured with IOLMaster 700 were 44.16 ± 1.60 D, 45.09 ± 1.68 D, 44.12 ± 1.62 D, and 45.14 ± 1.69 D, respectively. Those measured with Pentacam were 44.31 ± 1.57 D, 45.22 ± 1.65 D, 44.15 ± 1.67 D, and 45.19 ± 1.82 D, respectively. The astigmatism of ACS and TCA were −0.94 ± 0.63 D and −1.02 ± 0.69 D (p < 0.01) in the IOLMaster group and −0.90 ± 0.59 D and −1.05 ± 0.81 D in the Pentacam group, respectively (p < 0.01). TCA measurement results of IOLMaster and Pentacam were consistent (Pearson = 0.710, p < 0.01), and there was no significant difference (p = 0.591). CONCLUSIONS: Total corneal astigmatism measured by IOLMaster was consistent with that measured by Pentacam. The difference between the astigmatism of anterior corneal surface and total cornea was detected in the measurement of IOLMaster and Pentacam, respectively. Hindawi 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9286877/ /pubmed/35845936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9236006 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiaochun Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xiaochun
Cao, Xiaoguang
Bao, Yongzhen
Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam
title Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam
title_full Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam
title_fullStr Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam
title_short Comparison of Total Corneal Astigmatism between IOLMaster and Pentacam
title_sort comparison of total corneal astigmatism between iolmaster and pentacam
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35845936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9236006
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaochun comparisonoftotalcornealastigmatismbetweeniolmasterandpentacam
AT caoxiaoguang comparisonoftotalcornealastigmatismbetweeniolmasterandpentacam
AT baoyongzhen comparisonoftotalcornealastigmatismbetweeniolmasterandpentacam