Cargando…

Hijacking time: How Ophiocordyceps fungi could be using ant host clocks to manipulate behavior

Ophiocordyceps fungi manipulate ant behaviour as a transmission strategy. Conspicuous changes in the daily timing of disease phenotypes suggest that Ophiocordyceps and other manipulators could be hijacking the host clock. We discuss the available data that support the notion that Ophiocordyceps fung...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Bekker, Charissa, Das, Biplabendu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pim.12909
_version_ 1784748170032447488
author de Bekker, Charissa
Das, Biplabendu
author_facet de Bekker, Charissa
Das, Biplabendu
author_sort de Bekker, Charissa
collection PubMed
description Ophiocordyceps fungi manipulate ant behaviour as a transmission strategy. Conspicuous changes in the daily timing of disease phenotypes suggest that Ophiocordyceps and other manipulators could be hijacking the host clock. We discuss the available data that support the notion that Ophiocordyceps fungi could be hijacking ant host clocks and consider how altering daily behavioural rhythms could benefit the fungal infection cycle. By reviewing time‐course transcriptomics data for the parasite and the host, we argue that Ophiocordyceps has a light‐entrainable clock that might drive daily expression of candidate manipulation genes. Moreover, ant rhythms are seemingly highly plastic and involved in behavioural division of labour, which could make them susceptible to parasite hijacking. To provisionally test whether the expression of ant behavioural plasticity and rhythmicity genes could be affected by fungal manipulation, we performed a gene co‐expression network analysis on ant time‐course data and linked it to available behavioural manipulation data. We found that behavioural plasticity genes reside in the same modules as those affected during fungal manipulation. These modules showed significant connectivity with rhythmic gene modules, suggesting that Ophiocordyceps could be indirectly affecting the expression of those genes as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9287076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92870762022-07-19 Hijacking time: How Ophiocordyceps fungi could be using ant host clocks to manipulate behavior de Bekker, Charissa Das, Biplabendu Parasite Immunol Invited Reviews Ophiocordyceps fungi manipulate ant behaviour as a transmission strategy. Conspicuous changes in the daily timing of disease phenotypes suggest that Ophiocordyceps and other manipulators could be hijacking the host clock. We discuss the available data that support the notion that Ophiocordyceps fungi could be hijacking ant host clocks and consider how altering daily behavioural rhythms could benefit the fungal infection cycle. By reviewing time‐course transcriptomics data for the parasite and the host, we argue that Ophiocordyceps has a light‐entrainable clock that might drive daily expression of candidate manipulation genes. Moreover, ant rhythms are seemingly highly plastic and involved in behavioural division of labour, which could make them susceptible to parasite hijacking. To provisionally test whether the expression of ant behavioural plasticity and rhythmicity genes could be affected by fungal manipulation, we performed a gene co‐expression network analysis on ant time‐course data and linked it to available behavioural manipulation data. We found that behavioural plasticity genes reside in the same modules as those affected during fungal manipulation. These modules showed significant connectivity with rhythmic gene modules, suggesting that Ophiocordyceps could be indirectly affecting the expression of those genes as well. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-25 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9287076/ /pubmed/35103986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pim.12909 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Parasite Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Invited Reviews
de Bekker, Charissa
Das, Biplabendu
Hijacking time: How Ophiocordyceps fungi could be using ant host clocks to manipulate behavior
title Hijacking time: How Ophiocordyceps fungi could be using ant host clocks to manipulate behavior
title_full Hijacking time: How Ophiocordyceps fungi could be using ant host clocks to manipulate behavior
title_fullStr Hijacking time: How Ophiocordyceps fungi could be using ant host clocks to manipulate behavior
title_full_unstemmed Hijacking time: How Ophiocordyceps fungi could be using ant host clocks to manipulate behavior
title_short Hijacking time: How Ophiocordyceps fungi could be using ant host clocks to manipulate behavior
title_sort hijacking time: how ophiocordyceps fungi could be using ant host clocks to manipulate behavior
topic Invited Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pim.12909
work_keys_str_mv AT debekkercharissa hijackingtimehowophiocordycepsfungicouldbeusinganthostclockstomanipulatebehavior
AT dasbiplabendu hijackingtimehowophiocordycepsfungicouldbeusinganthostclockstomanipulatebehavior