Cargando…
The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer
PURPOSE: The need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients is currently questioned. Our objective was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a preoperative noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) model (an artificial neural network model) for predicting pathol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x |
_version_ | 1784748201325101056 |
---|---|
author | Skarping, Ida Nilsson, Kristoffer Dihge, Looket Fridhammar, Adam Ohlsson, Mattias Huss, Linnea Bendahl, Pär-Ola Steen Carlsson, Katarina Rydén, Lisa |
author_facet | Skarping, Ida Nilsson, Kristoffer Dihge, Looket Fridhammar, Adam Ohlsson, Mattias Huss, Linnea Bendahl, Pär-Ola Steen Carlsson, Katarina Rydén, Lisa |
author_sort | Skarping, Ida |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients is currently questioned. Our objective was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a preoperative noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) model (an artificial neural network model) for predicting pathological nodal status in patients with cN0 breast cancer (BC). METHODS: A health-economic decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate the utility of the NILS model in reducing the proportion of cN0 patients with low predicted risk undergoing SLNB. The model used information from a national registry and published studies, and three sensitivity/specificity scenarios of the NILS model were evaluated. Subgroup analysis explored the outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. The results are presented as cost (€) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per 1000 patients. RESULTS: All three scenarios of the NILS model reduced total costs (–€93,244 to –€398,941 per 1000 patients). The overall health benefit allowing for the impact of SLNB complications was a net health gain (7.0–26.9 QALYs per 1000 patients). Sensitivity analyses disregarding reduced quality of life from lymphedema showed a small loss in total health benefits (0.4–4.0 QALYs per 1000 patients) because of the reduction in total life years (0.6–6.5 life years per 1000 patients) after reduced adjuvant treatment. Subgroup analyses showed greater cost reductions and QALY gains in patients undergoing BCS. CONCLUSION: Implementing the NILS model to identify patients with low risk for nodal metastases was associated with substantial cost reductions and likely overall health gains, especially in patients undergoing BCS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9287207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92872072022-07-17 The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer Skarping, Ida Nilsson, Kristoffer Dihge, Looket Fridhammar, Adam Ohlsson, Mattias Huss, Linnea Bendahl, Pär-Ola Steen Carlsson, Katarina Rydén, Lisa Breast Cancer Res Treat Clinical Trial PURPOSE: The need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients is currently questioned. Our objective was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a preoperative noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) model (an artificial neural network model) for predicting pathological nodal status in patients with cN0 breast cancer (BC). METHODS: A health-economic decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate the utility of the NILS model in reducing the proportion of cN0 patients with low predicted risk undergoing SLNB. The model used information from a national registry and published studies, and three sensitivity/specificity scenarios of the NILS model were evaluated. Subgroup analysis explored the outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. The results are presented as cost (€) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per 1000 patients. RESULTS: All three scenarios of the NILS model reduced total costs (–€93,244 to –€398,941 per 1000 patients). The overall health benefit allowing for the impact of SLNB complications was a net health gain (7.0–26.9 QALYs per 1000 patients). Sensitivity analyses disregarding reduced quality of life from lymphedema showed a small loss in total health benefits (0.4–4.0 QALYs per 1000 patients) because of the reduction in total life years (0.6–6.5 life years per 1000 patients) after reduced adjuvant treatment. Subgroup analyses showed greater cost reductions and QALY gains in patients undergoing BCS. CONCLUSION: Implementing the NILS model to identify patients with low risk for nodal metastases was associated with substantial cost reductions and likely overall health gains, especially in patients undergoing BCS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x. Springer US 2022-07-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9287207/ /pubmed/35790694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Skarping, Ida Nilsson, Kristoffer Dihge, Looket Fridhammar, Adam Ohlsson, Mattias Huss, Linnea Bendahl, Pär-Ola Steen Carlsson, Katarina Rydén, Lisa The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer |
title | The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer |
title_full | The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer |
title_fullStr | The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer |
title_short | The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer |
title_sort | implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (nils) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer |
topic | Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skarpingida theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT nilssonkristoffer theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT dihgelooket theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT fridhammaradam theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT ohlssonmattias theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT husslinnea theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT bendahlparola theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT steencarlssonkatarina theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT rydenlisa theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT skarpingida implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT nilssonkristoffer implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT dihgelooket implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT fridhammaradam implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT ohlssonmattias implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT husslinnea implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT bendahlparola implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT steencarlssonkatarina implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer AT rydenlisa implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer |