Cargando…

The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer

PURPOSE: The need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients is currently questioned. Our objective was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a preoperative noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) model (an artificial neural network model) for predicting pathol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skarping, Ida, Nilsson, Kristoffer, Dihge, Looket, Fridhammar, Adam, Ohlsson, Mattias, Huss, Linnea, Bendahl, Pär-Ola, Steen Carlsson, Katarina, Rydén, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x
_version_ 1784748201325101056
author Skarping, Ida
Nilsson, Kristoffer
Dihge, Looket
Fridhammar, Adam
Ohlsson, Mattias
Huss, Linnea
Bendahl, Pär-Ola
Steen Carlsson, Katarina
Rydén, Lisa
author_facet Skarping, Ida
Nilsson, Kristoffer
Dihge, Looket
Fridhammar, Adam
Ohlsson, Mattias
Huss, Linnea
Bendahl, Pär-Ola
Steen Carlsson, Katarina
Rydén, Lisa
author_sort Skarping, Ida
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients is currently questioned. Our objective was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a preoperative noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) model (an artificial neural network model) for predicting pathological nodal status in patients with cN0 breast cancer (BC). METHODS: A health-economic decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate the utility of the NILS model in reducing the proportion of cN0 patients with low predicted risk undergoing SLNB. The model used information from a national registry and published studies, and three sensitivity/specificity scenarios of the NILS model were evaluated. Subgroup analysis explored the outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. The results are presented as cost (€) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per 1000 patients. RESULTS: All three scenarios of the NILS model reduced total costs (–€93,244 to –€398,941 per 1000 patients). The overall health benefit allowing for the impact of SLNB complications was a net health gain (7.0–26.9 QALYs per 1000 patients). Sensitivity analyses disregarding reduced quality of life from lymphedema showed a small loss in total health benefits (0.4–4.0 QALYs per 1000 patients) because of the reduction in total life years (0.6–6.5 life years per 1000 patients) after reduced adjuvant treatment. Subgroup analyses showed greater cost reductions and QALY gains in patients undergoing BCS. CONCLUSION: Implementing the NILS model to identify patients with low risk for nodal metastases was associated with substantial cost reductions and likely overall health gains, especially in patients undergoing BCS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9287207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92872072022-07-17 The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer Skarping, Ida Nilsson, Kristoffer Dihge, Looket Fridhammar, Adam Ohlsson, Mattias Huss, Linnea Bendahl, Pär-Ola Steen Carlsson, Katarina Rydén, Lisa Breast Cancer Res Treat Clinical Trial PURPOSE: The need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients is currently questioned. Our objective was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a preoperative noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) model (an artificial neural network model) for predicting pathological nodal status in patients with cN0 breast cancer (BC). METHODS: A health-economic decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate the utility of the NILS model in reducing the proportion of cN0 patients with low predicted risk undergoing SLNB. The model used information from a national registry and published studies, and three sensitivity/specificity scenarios of the NILS model were evaluated. Subgroup analysis explored the outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. The results are presented as cost (€) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per 1000 patients. RESULTS: All three scenarios of the NILS model reduced total costs (–€93,244 to –€398,941 per 1000 patients). The overall health benefit allowing for the impact of SLNB complications was a net health gain (7.0–26.9 QALYs per 1000 patients). Sensitivity analyses disregarding reduced quality of life from lymphedema showed a small loss in total health benefits (0.4–4.0 QALYs per 1000 patients) because of the reduction in total life years (0.6–6.5 life years per 1000 patients) after reduced adjuvant treatment. Subgroup analyses showed greater cost reductions and QALY gains in patients undergoing BCS. CONCLUSION: Implementing the NILS model to identify patients with low risk for nodal metastases was associated with substantial cost reductions and likely overall health gains, especially in patients undergoing BCS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x. Springer US 2022-07-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9287207/ /pubmed/35790694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Trial
Skarping, Ida
Nilsson, Kristoffer
Dihge, Looket
Fridhammar, Adam
Ohlsson, Mattias
Huss, Linnea
Bendahl, Pär-Ola
Steen Carlsson, Katarina
Rydén, Lisa
The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer
title The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer
title_full The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer
title_fullStr The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer
title_short The implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer
title_sort implementation of a noninvasive lymph node staging (nils) preoperative prediction model is cost effective in primary breast cancer
topic Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06636-x
work_keys_str_mv AT skarpingida theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT nilssonkristoffer theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT dihgelooket theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT fridhammaradam theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT ohlssonmattias theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT husslinnea theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT bendahlparola theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT steencarlssonkatarina theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT rydenlisa theimplementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT skarpingida implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT nilssonkristoffer implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT dihgelooket implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT fridhammaradam implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT ohlssonmattias implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT husslinnea implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT bendahlparola implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT steencarlssonkatarina implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer
AT rydenlisa implementationofanoninvasivelymphnodestagingnilspreoperativepredictionmodeliscosteffectiveinprimarybreastcancer