Cargando…
Reply to: Arguments for a comet as cause of the Hopewell airburst are unsubstantiated
Autores principales: | Tankersley, Kenneth Barnett, Meyers, Stephen D., Meyers, Stephanie A., Lentz, David L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35840768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16212-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Arguments for a comet as cause of the Hopewell airburst are unsubstantiated
por: Neuhäuser, Ralph, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Refuting the sensational claim of a Hopewell-ending cosmic airburst
por: Nolan, Kevin C., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Hopewell airburst event, 1699–1567 years ago (252–383 CE)
por: Tankersley, Kenneth Barnett, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Retraction Note: The Hopewell airburst event, 1699–1567 years ago (252–383 CE)
por: Tankersley, Kenneth Barnett, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Reply to: The breakup of a long-period comet is not a likely match to the Chicxulub impactor
por: Siraj, Amir, et al.
Publicado: (2022)