Cargando…

Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsourdi, Elena, Drake, Matthew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7
_version_ 1784748307061407744
author Tsourdi, Elena
Drake, Matthew T.
author_facet Tsourdi, Elena
Drake, Matthew T.
author_sort Tsourdi, Elena
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are safe and effective during the pandemic and should be continued whenever possible. Bisphosphonates have long-lasting effects on bone turnover such that delays in their administration are unlikely to be harmful to skeletal health. In contrast, interruption of denosumab treatment is strongly discouraged because of rapid loss of bone mass and an associated increased risk for rebound vertebral fractures. When osteoanabolic treatments cannot be continued during the pandemic, change to an oral bisphosphonate is advised. Preclinical data suggest possible beneficial effects of some therapies against COVID-19, but require validation in clinical studies. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a more severe COVID-19 clinical course but data supporting improvements in outcomes with vitamin D supplementation are lacking. SUMMARY: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term bone health remains unknown but focused interventions to ensure osteoporosis treatment initiation/maintenance should be implemented. Future studies are needed to determine whether osteoporosis medications have an impact on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and COVID-19 clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9287705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92877052022-07-18 Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era Tsourdi, Elena Drake, Matthew T. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol Osteoporosis (K Saag, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are safe and effective during the pandemic and should be continued whenever possible. Bisphosphonates have long-lasting effects on bone turnover such that delays in their administration are unlikely to be harmful to skeletal health. In contrast, interruption of denosumab treatment is strongly discouraged because of rapid loss of bone mass and an associated increased risk for rebound vertebral fractures. When osteoanabolic treatments cannot be continued during the pandemic, change to an oral bisphosphonate is advised. Preclinical data suggest possible beneficial effects of some therapies against COVID-19, but require validation in clinical studies. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a more severe COVID-19 clinical course but data supporting improvements in outcomes with vitamin D supplementation are lacking. SUMMARY: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term bone health remains unknown but focused interventions to ensure osteoporosis treatment initiation/maintenance should be implemented. Future studies are needed to determine whether osteoporosis medications have an impact on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and COVID-19 clinical outcomes. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9287705/ /pubmed/35875832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Osteoporosis (K Saag, Section Editor)
Tsourdi, Elena
Drake, Matthew T.
Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era
title Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era
title_full Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era
title_fullStr Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era
title_full_unstemmed Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era
title_short Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era
title_sort pros and cons of skeletal medications in the covid-19 era
topic Osteoporosis (K Saag, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tsourdielena prosandconsofskeletalmedicationsinthecovid19era
AT drakematthewt prosandconsofskeletalmedicationsinthecovid19era