Cargando…
Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are s...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7 |
_version_ | 1784748307061407744 |
---|---|
author | Tsourdi, Elena Drake, Matthew T. |
author_facet | Tsourdi, Elena Drake, Matthew T. |
author_sort | Tsourdi, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are safe and effective during the pandemic and should be continued whenever possible. Bisphosphonates have long-lasting effects on bone turnover such that delays in their administration are unlikely to be harmful to skeletal health. In contrast, interruption of denosumab treatment is strongly discouraged because of rapid loss of bone mass and an associated increased risk for rebound vertebral fractures. When osteoanabolic treatments cannot be continued during the pandemic, change to an oral bisphosphonate is advised. Preclinical data suggest possible beneficial effects of some therapies against COVID-19, but require validation in clinical studies. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a more severe COVID-19 clinical course but data supporting improvements in outcomes with vitamin D supplementation are lacking. SUMMARY: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term bone health remains unknown but focused interventions to ensure osteoporosis treatment initiation/maintenance should be implemented. Future studies are needed to determine whether osteoporosis medications have an impact on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and COVID-19 clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9287705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92877052022-07-18 Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era Tsourdi, Elena Drake, Matthew T. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol Osteoporosis (K Saag, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview regarding osteoporosis therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted treatments for osteoporosis and resulted in decreased adherence particularly for parenteral regimens. Osteoporosis medications are safe and effective during the pandemic and should be continued whenever possible. Bisphosphonates have long-lasting effects on bone turnover such that delays in their administration are unlikely to be harmful to skeletal health. In contrast, interruption of denosumab treatment is strongly discouraged because of rapid loss of bone mass and an associated increased risk for rebound vertebral fractures. When osteoanabolic treatments cannot be continued during the pandemic, change to an oral bisphosphonate is advised. Preclinical data suggest possible beneficial effects of some therapies against COVID-19, but require validation in clinical studies. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a more severe COVID-19 clinical course but data supporting improvements in outcomes with vitamin D supplementation are lacking. SUMMARY: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term bone health remains unknown but focused interventions to ensure osteoporosis treatment initiation/maintenance should be implemented. Future studies are needed to determine whether osteoporosis medications have an impact on SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and COVID-19 clinical outcomes. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9287705/ /pubmed/35875832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Osteoporosis (K Saag, Section Editor) Tsourdi, Elena Drake, Matthew T. Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era |
title | Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era |
title_full | Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era |
title_fullStr | Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era |
title_full_unstemmed | Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era |
title_short | Pros and Cons of Skeletal Medications in the COVID-19 Era |
title_sort | pros and cons of skeletal medications in the covid-19 era |
topic | Osteoporosis (K Saag, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40674-022-00192-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsourdielena prosandconsofskeletalmedicationsinthecovid19era AT drakematthewt prosandconsofskeletalmedicationsinthecovid19era |