Cargando…
Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction
Here we describe a retrospective clinical evaluation of the QIAGEN artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay that detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA without the need for a nucleic acid eluate extraction procedure. Using Roche SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on the cobas® 8800 platform as a reference standard, a total of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100098 |
_version_ | 1784748339948945408 |
---|---|
author | O'Hara, Robert William Brown, Benjamin Hughes, Angela McEwan, Ashley Birtles, Andrew Hawker, Adam Davies, Emma Farooq, Hamzah Z Tilston, Peter Haigh, Dominic Hesketh, Louise Dodgson, Andrew Dodgson, Kirsty Shazaad, Ahmad Guiver, Malcolm Machin, Nicholas |
author_facet | O'Hara, Robert William Brown, Benjamin Hughes, Angela McEwan, Ashley Birtles, Andrew Hawker, Adam Davies, Emma Farooq, Hamzah Z Tilston, Peter Haigh, Dominic Hesketh, Louise Dodgson, Andrew Dodgson, Kirsty Shazaad, Ahmad Guiver, Malcolm Machin, Nicholas |
author_sort | O'Hara, Robert William |
collection | PubMed |
description | Here we describe a retrospective clinical evaluation of the QIAGEN artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay that detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA without the need for a nucleic acid eluate extraction procedure. Using Roche SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on the cobas® 8800 platform as a reference standard, a total of 225 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive and 320 negative nasopharyngeal swabs in viral transport media, were used to evaluate the artus® assay. Using the RT-PCR cycle threshold as a semi-quantitative marker of viral load, an assessment of over 370,000 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive results was used in the design of the reference positive specimen cohort. The viral load of all reference positive specimens used in the evaluation was a unique and accurate representation of the range and levels of SARS-CoV-2 positivity observed over a 13-month period of the COVID-19 pandemic. The artus® RT-PCR detects the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, an internal control, and the human RNase P gene to ensure specimen quality. The diagnostic sensitivity of artus® was 92.89% with a specificity of 100%. To assess the analytical sensitivity, a limit of detection was performed using the 1(st) WHO NIBSC SARS-CoV-2 international standard, recording a 95% LOD of 1.1 × 10(3) IU/ml. The total invalid rate of specimens was 7.34% due to a lack of detectable RNase P (C(t) >35). The artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay is a new rapid RT-PCR assay, which may be considered to produce acceptable levels of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity whilst potentially halving the laboratory processing time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9287855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92878552022-07-18 Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction O'Hara, Robert William Brown, Benjamin Hughes, Angela McEwan, Ashley Birtles, Andrew Hawker, Adam Davies, Emma Farooq, Hamzah Z Tilston, Peter Haigh, Dominic Hesketh, Louise Dodgson, Andrew Dodgson, Kirsty Shazaad, Ahmad Guiver, Malcolm Machin, Nicholas J Clin Virol Plus Article Here we describe a retrospective clinical evaluation of the QIAGEN artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay that detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA without the need for a nucleic acid eluate extraction procedure. Using Roche SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on the cobas® 8800 platform as a reference standard, a total of 225 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive and 320 negative nasopharyngeal swabs in viral transport media, were used to evaluate the artus® assay. Using the RT-PCR cycle threshold as a semi-quantitative marker of viral load, an assessment of over 370,000 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive results was used in the design of the reference positive specimen cohort. The viral load of all reference positive specimens used in the evaluation was a unique and accurate representation of the range and levels of SARS-CoV-2 positivity observed over a 13-month period of the COVID-19 pandemic. The artus® RT-PCR detects the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, an internal control, and the human RNase P gene to ensure specimen quality. The diagnostic sensitivity of artus® was 92.89% with a specificity of 100%. To assess the analytical sensitivity, a limit of detection was performed using the 1(st) WHO NIBSC SARS-CoV-2 international standard, recording a 95% LOD of 1.1 × 10(3) IU/ml. The total invalid rate of specimens was 7.34% due to a lack of detectable RNase P (C(t) >35). The artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay is a new rapid RT-PCR assay, which may be considered to produce acceptable levels of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity whilst potentially halving the laboratory processing time. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-08 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9287855/ /pubmed/35874465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100098 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article O'Hara, Robert William Brown, Benjamin Hughes, Angela McEwan, Ashley Birtles, Andrew Hawker, Adam Davies, Emma Farooq, Hamzah Z Tilston, Peter Haigh, Dominic Hesketh, Louise Dodgson, Andrew Dodgson, Kirsty Shazaad, Ahmad Guiver, Malcolm Machin, Nicholas Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction |
title | Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction |
title_full | Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction |
title_short | Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction |
title_sort | evaluation of the artus® prep& um rt-pcr for detection of sars-cov-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohararobertwilliam evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT brownbenjamin evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT hughesangela evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT mcewanashley evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT birtlesandrew evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT hawkeradam evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT daviesemma evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT farooqhamzahz evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT tilstonpeter evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT haighdominic evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT heskethlouise evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT dodgsonandrew evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT dodgsonkirsty evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT shazaadahmad evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT guivermalcolm evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction AT machinnicholas evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction |