Cargando…

Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction

Here we describe a retrospective clinical evaluation of the QIAGEN artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay that detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA without the need for a nucleic acid eluate extraction procedure. Using Roche SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on the cobas® 8800 platform as a reference standard, a total of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Hara, Robert William, Brown, Benjamin, Hughes, Angela, McEwan, Ashley, Birtles, Andrew, Hawker, Adam, Davies, Emma, Farooq, Hamzah Z, Tilston, Peter, Haigh, Dominic, Hesketh, Louise, Dodgson, Andrew, Dodgson, Kirsty, Shazaad, Ahmad, Guiver, Malcolm, Machin, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100098
_version_ 1784748339948945408
author O'Hara, Robert William
Brown, Benjamin
Hughes, Angela
McEwan, Ashley
Birtles, Andrew
Hawker, Adam
Davies, Emma
Farooq, Hamzah Z
Tilston, Peter
Haigh, Dominic
Hesketh, Louise
Dodgson, Andrew
Dodgson, Kirsty
Shazaad, Ahmad
Guiver, Malcolm
Machin, Nicholas
author_facet O'Hara, Robert William
Brown, Benjamin
Hughes, Angela
McEwan, Ashley
Birtles, Andrew
Hawker, Adam
Davies, Emma
Farooq, Hamzah Z
Tilston, Peter
Haigh, Dominic
Hesketh, Louise
Dodgson, Andrew
Dodgson, Kirsty
Shazaad, Ahmad
Guiver, Malcolm
Machin, Nicholas
author_sort O'Hara, Robert William
collection PubMed
description Here we describe a retrospective clinical evaluation of the QIAGEN artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay that detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA without the need for a nucleic acid eluate extraction procedure. Using Roche SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on the cobas® 8800 platform as a reference standard, a total of 225 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive and 320 negative nasopharyngeal swabs in viral transport media, were used to evaluate the artus® assay. Using the RT-PCR cycle threshold as a semi-quantitative marker of viral load, an assessment of over 370,000 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive results was used in the design of the reference positive specimen cohort. The viral load of all reference positive specimens used in the evaluation was a unique and accurate representation of the range and levels of SARS-CoV-2 positivity observed over a 13-month period of the COVID-19 pandemic. The artus® RT-PCR detects the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, an internal control, and the human RNase P gene to ensure specimen quality. The diagnostic sensitivity of artus® was 92.89% with a specificity of 100%. To assess the analytical sensitivity, a limit of detection was performed using the 1(st) WHO NIBSC SARS-CoV-2 international standard, recording a 95% LOD of 1.1 × 10(3) IU/ml. The total invalid rate of specimens was 7.34% due to a lack of detectable RNase P (C(t) >35). The artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay is a new rapid RT-PCR assay, which may be considered to produce acceptable levels of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity whilst potentially halving the laboratory processing time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9287855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92878552022-07-18 Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction O'Hara, Robert William Brown, Benjamin Hughes, Angela McEwan, Ashley Birtles, Andrew Hawker, Adam Davies, Emma Farooq, Hamzah Z Tilston, Peter Haigh, Dominic Hesketh, Louise Dodgson, Andrew Dodgson, Kirsty Shazaad, Ahmad Guiver, Malcolm Machin, Nicholas J Clin Virol Plus Article Here we describe a retrospective clinical evaluation of the QIAGEN artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay that detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA without the need for a nucleic acid eluate extraction procedure. Using Roche SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on the cobas® 8800 platform as a reference standard, a total of 225 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive and 320 negative nasopharyngeal swabs in viral transport media, were used to evaluate the artus® assay. Using the RT-PCR cycle threshold as a semi-quantitative marker of viral load, an assessment of over 370,000 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive results was used in the design of the reference positive specimen cohort. The viral load of all reference positive specimens used in the evaluation was a unique and accurate representation of the range and levels of SARS-CoV-2 positivity observed over a 13-month period of the COVID-19 pandemic. The artus® RT-PCR detects the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, an internal control, and the human RNase P gene to ensure specimen quality. The diagnostic sensitivity of artus® was 92.89% with a specificity of 100%. To assess the analytical sensitivity, a limit of detection was performed using the 1(st) WHO NIBSC SARS-CoV-2 international standard, recording a 95% LOD of 1.1 × 10(3) IU/ml. The total invalid rate of specimens was 7.34% due to a lack of detectable RNase P (C(t) >35). The artus® SARS-CoV-2 Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR assay is a new rapid RT-PCR assay, which may be considered to produce acceptable levels of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity whilst potentially halving the laboratory processing time. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-08 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9287855/ /pubmed/35874465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100098 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
O'Hara, Robert William
Brown, Benjamin
Hughes, Angela
McEwan, Ashley
Birtles, Andrew
Hawker, Adam
Davies, Emma
Farooq, Hamzah Z
Tilston, Peter
Haigh, Dominic
Hesketh, Louise
Dodgson, Andrew
Dodgson, Kirsty
Shazaad, Ahmad
Guiver, Malcolm
Machin, Nicholas
Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction
title Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction
title_full Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction
title_fullStr Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction
title_short Evaluation of the artus® Prep&Amp UM RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction
title_sort evaluation of the artus® prep&amp um rt-pcr for detection of sars-cov-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs without prior nucleic acid eluate extraction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100098
work_keys_str_mv AT ohararobertwilliam evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT brownbenjamin evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT hughesangela evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT mcewanashley evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT birtlesandrew evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT hawkeradam evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT daviesemma evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT farooqhamzahz evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT tilstonpeter evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT haighdominic evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT heskethlouise evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT dodgsonandrew evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT dodgsonkirsty evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT shazaadahmad evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT guivermalcolm evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction
AT machinnicholas evaluationoftheartusprepampumrtpcrfordetectionofsarscov2fromnasopharyngealswabswithoutpriornucleicacideluateextraction