Cargando…

Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models

BACKGROUND: Falls impose significant health and economic burdens on community-dwelling older persons. Decision modelling can inform commissioning of alternative falls prevention strategies. Several methodological challenges arise when modelling public health interventions including community-based f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Joseph, Squires, Hazel, Franklin, Matthew, Young, Tracey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00367-y
_version_ 1784748356356014080
author Kwon, Joseph
Squires, Hazel
Franklin, Matthew
Young, Tracey
author_facet Kwon, Joseph
Squires, Hazel
Franklin, Matthew
Young, Tracey
author_sort Kwon, Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Falls impose significant health and economic burdens on community-dwelling older persons. Decision modelling can inform commissioning of alternative falls prevention strategies. Several methodological challenges arise when modelling public health interventions including community-based falls prevention. This study aims to conduct a systematic review (SR) to: systematically identify community-based falls prevention economic models; synthesise and critically appraise how the models handled key methodological challenges associated with public health modelling; and suggest areas for further methodological research. METHODS: The SR followed the 2021 PRISMA reporting guideline and covered the period 2003–2020 and 12 academic databases and grey literature. The extracted methodological features of included models were synthesised by their relevance to the following challenges: (1) capturing non-health outcomes and societal intervention costs; (2) considering heterogeneity and dynamic complexity; (3) considering theories of human behaviour and implementation; and (4) considering equity issues. The critical appraisal assessed the prevalence of each feature across models, then appraised the methods used to incorporate the feature. The methodological strengths and limitations stated by the modellers were used as indicators of desirable modelling practice and scope for improvement, respectively. The methods were also compared against those suggested in the broader empirical and methodological literature. Areas of further methodological research were suggested based on appraisal results. RESULTS: 46 models were identified. Comprehensive incorporation of non-health outcomes and societal intervention costs was infrequent. The assessments of heterogeneity and dynamic complexity were limited; subgroup delineation was confined primarily to demographics and binary disease/physical status. Few models incorporated heterogeneity in intervention implementation level, efficacy and cost. Few dynamic variables other than age and falls history were incorporated to characterise the trajectories of falls risk and general health/frailty. Intervention sustainability was frequently based on assumptions; few models estimated the economic/health returns from improved implementation. Seven models incorporated ethnicity- and severity-based subgroups but did not estimate the equity-efficiency trade-offs. Sixteen methodological research suggestions were made. CONCLUSION: Existing community-based falls prevention models contain methodological limitations spanning four challenge areas relevant for public health modelling. There is scope for further methodological research to inform the development of falls prevention and other public health models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-022-00367-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9287934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92879342022-07-17 Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models Kwon, Joseph Squires, Hazel Franklin, Matthew Young, Tracey Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: Falls impose significant health and economic burdens on community-dwelling older persons. Decision modelling can inform commissioning of alternative falls prevention strategies. Several methodological challenges arise when modelling public health interventions including community-based falls prevention. This study aims to conduct a systematic review (SR) to: systematically identify community-based falls prevention economic models; synthesise and critically appraise how the models handled key methodological challenges associated with public health modelling; and suggest areas for further methodological research. METHODS: The SR followed the 2021 PRISMA reporting guideline and covered the period 2003–2020 and 12 academic databases and grey literature. The extracted methodological features of included models were synthesised by their relevance to the following challenges: (1) capturing non-health outcomes and societal intervention costs; (2) considering heterogeneity and dynamic complexity; (3) considering theories of human behaviour and implementation; and (4) considering equity issues. The critical appraisal assessed the prevalence of each feature across models, then appraised the methods used to incorporate the feature. The methodological strengths and limitations stated by the modellers were used as indicators of desirable modelling practice and scope for improvement, respectively. The methods were also compared against those suggested in the broader empirical and methodological literature. Areas of further methodological research were suggested based on appraisal results. RESULTS: 46 models were identified. Comprehensive incorporation of non-health outcomes and societal intervention costs was infrequent. The assessments of heterogeneity and dynamic complexity were limited; subgroup delineation was confined primarily to demographics and binary disease/physical status. Few models incorporated heterogeneity in intervention implementation level, efficacy and cost. Few dynamic variables other than age and falls history were incorporated to characterise the trajectories of falls risk and general health/frailty. Intervention sustainability was frequently based on assumptions; few models estimated the economic/health returns from improved implementation. Seven models incorporated ethnicity- and severity-based subgroups but did not estimate the equity-efficiency trade-offs. Sixteen methodological research suggestions were made. CONCLUSION: Existing community-based falls prevention models contain methodological limitations spanning four challenge areas relevant for public health modelling. There is scope for further methodological research to inform the development of falls prevention and other public health models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-022-00367-y. BioMed Central 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9287934/ /pubmed/35842721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00367-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Kwon, Joseph
Squires, Hazel
Franklin, Matthew
Young, Tracey
Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models
title Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models
title_full Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models
title_fullStr Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models
title_short Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models
title_sort systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00367-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonjoseph systematicreviewandcriticalmethodologicalappraisalofcommunitybasedfallspreventioneconomicmodels
AT squireshazel systematicreviewandcriticalmethodologicalappraisalofcommunitybasedfallspreventioneconomicmodels
AT franklinmatthew systematicreviewandcriticalmethodologicalappraisalofcommunitybasedfallspreventioneconomicmodels
AT youngtracey systematicreviewandcriticalmethodologicalappraisalofcommunitybasedfallspreventioneconomicmodels