Cargando…
Development of Radiographic Radiation Pneumonitis (RP) in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) May Be Protective Against Further Disease Progression
Objectives: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a local inflammatory response, and we hypothesize that RP serves as an immune stimulator and is a protective factor against disease progression. Methods: We analyzed patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859984 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25994 |
Sumario: | Objectives: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a local inflammatory response, and we hypothesize that RP serves as an immune stimulator and is a protective factor against disease progression. Methods: We analyzed patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) at two institutions. Radiographic RP (RRP) was evaluated and maximal axial dimensions were measured at three-, six-, and twelve-month timepoints with surveillance CT. RRP was measured using radiographic markers such as ground-glass opacities and airspace consolidation. Disease recurrence was evaluated and categorized as local, regional, and distant. Results: Seventy-seven unique patient records were randomly selected from the database, 72 patients (93.5%) had RRP and five patients (6.5%) did not. The median follow-up was 24.3 months (IQR: 12.0 - 41.9). Disease failure occurred in 28.6% of patients with 6.5% local only, 2.6% regional only, 7.8% distant only, and 11.7% with multiple recurrences. Patients with RRP demonstrated a lower rate of disease failure with 25.0% of those with RRP experiencing disease failure and 80% of those without RRP experiencing disease failure (p=0.02). Patients with RRP had a 71% reduced risk of disease recurrence, compared to patients with no RRP, after adjusting for maximum tumor dimension (HR 0.29, p = 0.05). Among patients with RRP, there was no significant difference in recurrence based on extent of RRP (maximal area of RRP on CT). RRP did not correlate with overall survival. Discussion: Most patients who received SBRT had RRP, and this study suggests that it may be protective of cancer recurrence. These results are hypothesis-generating and will need to be validated in larger and independent datasets. |
---|