Cargando…

Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions

PURPOSE: The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelrahman, Ahmed S., Madkour, Sherihan S., Ekladious, Mena E.Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892071
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.117590
_version_ 1784748416185663488
author Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
Madkour, Sherihan S.
Ekladious, Mena E.Y.
author_facet Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
Madkour, Sherihan S.
Ekladious, Mena E.Y.
author_sort Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using LI-RADS v2018 lexicon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with 69 hepatic observations were included in our study. The major and ancillary features of each hepatic observation were evaluated by 2 radiologists using LI-RADS v2018, and the interreader agreement was allocated. RESULTS: The inter-reader agreement of major LI-RADS features was substantial; κ of non-rim arterial hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout appearance, and enhancing capsule was 0.796, 0.799, and 0.772 (p < 0.001), respectively. The agreement of the final LI-RADS category was substantial with κ = 0.651 (p < 0.001), and weighted κ = 0.786 (p < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement of the ancillary features was substantial to almost perfect (k range from 0.718 to 1; p < 0.001). An almost perfect correlation was noted for the hepatic lesion size measurement with ICC = 0.977 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The major and ancillary features of the LI-RADS v2018, as well as the final category and lesions size, have substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9288199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92881992022-07-25 Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions Abdelrahman, Ahmed S. Madkour, Sherihan S. Ekladious, Mena E.Y. Pol J Radiol Original Paper PURPOSE: The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using LI-RADS v2018 lexicon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with 69 hepatic observations were included in our study. The major and ancillary features of each hepatic observation were evaluated by 2 radiologists using LI-RADS v2018, and the interreader agreement was allocated. RESULTS: The inter-reader agreement of major LI-RADS features was substantial; κ of non-rim arterial hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout appearance, and enhancing capsule was 0.796, 0.799, and 0.772 (p < 0.001), respectively. The agreement of the final LI-RADS category was substantial with κ = 0.651 (p < 0.001), and weighted κ = 0.786 (p < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement of the ancillary features was substantial to almost perfect (k range from 0.718 to 1; p < 0.001). An almost perfect correlation was noted for the hepatic lesion size measurement with ICC = 0.977 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The major and ancillary features of the LI-RADS v2018, as well as the final category and lesions size, have substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement. Termedia Publishing House 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9288199/ /pubmed/35892071 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.117590 Text en © Pol J Radiol 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Paper
Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
Madkour, Sherihan S.
Ekladious, Mena E.Y.
Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
title Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
title_full Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
title_fullStr Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
title_full_unstemmed Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
title_short Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
title_sort interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (li-rads) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892071
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.117590
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelrahmanahmeds interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheliverimagingreportinganddatasystemliradsv2018fortheevaluationofhepaticlesions
AT madkoursherihans interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheliverimagingreportinganddatasystemliradsv2018fortheevaluationofhepaticlesions
AT ekladiousmenaey interraterreliabilityandagreementoftheliverimagingreportinganddatasystemliradsv2018fortheevaluationofhepaticlesions