Cargando…
With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 1.5 T and 3.0 T upper abdominal magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) under three acquisition techniques of breath holding, breath triggering, and free breathing, so as to provide a reference for the usage of upper abdominal DWI scanning. METHODS: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9579145 |
_version_ | 1784748446367875072 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Zhuo Jiang, Jiuming Ouyang, Han Xie, Lizhi Zhao, Xinming |
author_facet | Shi, Zhuo Jiang, Jiuming Ouyang, Han Xie, Lizhi Zhao, Xinming |
author_sort | Shi, Zhuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 1.5 T and 3.0 T upper abdominal magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) under three acquisition techniques of breath holding, breath triggering, and free breathing, so as to provide a reference for the usage of upper abdominal DWI scanning. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy subjects were selected from social volunteers and underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DWI on 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. DWI included three acquisition methods: breath triggering, breath holding, and free breathing, and b values were 100 and 800. The DWI image artifacts, image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) obtained through the three acquisition methods were compared. RESULTS: The 1.5 T free-breathing DWI image quality was the best, while the 3.0 T had the best breath-triggered DWI image quality. The 3.0 T breath-triggered DWI image quality was better than the 1.5 T free-breathing DWI image (P=0.012), and the SNR of free-breathing DWI was the highest. Between the two field intensities, the SNR of the liver in the 3.0 T group was much lower than that in the 1.5 T group, and obvious differences were not observed in ADC values of normal liver, gallbladder, kidney, spleen, and pancreas. CONCLUSION: 3.0 T respiratory-triggered acquisition can obtain higher quality DWI images. But in the case of only 1.5 T field strength, free-breathing acquisition of DWI images should be selected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9288320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92883202022-07-18 With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen Shi, Zhuo Jiang, Jiuming Ouyang, Han Xie, Lizhi Zhao, Xinming Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 1.5 T and 3.0 T upper abdominal magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) under three acquisition techniques of breath holding, breath triggering, and free breathing, so as to provide a reference for the usage of upper abdominal DWI scanning. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy subjects were selected from social volunteers and underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DWI on 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. DWI included three acquisition methods: breath triggering, breath holding, and free breathing, and b values were 100 and 800. The DWI image artifacts, image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) obtained through the three acquisition methods were compared. RESULTS: The 1.5 T free-breathing DWI image quality was the best, while the 3.0 T had the best breath-triggered DWI image quality. The 3.0 T breath-triggered DWI image quality was better than the 1.5 T free-breathing DWI image (P=0.012), and the SNR of free-breathing DWI was the highest. Between the two field intensities, the SNR of the liver in the 3.0 T group was much lower than that in the 1.5 T group, and obvious differences were not observed in ADC values of normal liver, gallbladder, kidney, spleen, and pancreas. CONCLUSION: 3.0 T respiratory-triggered acquisition can obtain higher quality DWI images. But in the case of only 1.5 T field strength, free-breathing acquisition of DWI images should be selected. Hindawi 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9288320/ /pubmed/35854769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9579145 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhuo Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shi, Zhuo Jiang, Jiuming Ouyang, Han Xie, Lizhi Zhao, Xinming With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen |
title | With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen |
title_full | With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen |
title_fullStr | With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen |
title_full_unstemmed | With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen |
title_short | With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen |
title_sort | with 3 types of respiratory acquisition: 3.0 t respiratory triggered acquisition can obtain higher quality dwi images of the upper abdomen |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9579145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shizhuo with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen AT jiangjiuming with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen AT ouyanghan with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen AT xielizhi with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen AT zhaoxinming with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen |