Cargando…

With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 1.5 T and 3.0 T upper abdominal magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) under three acquisition techniques of breath holding, breath triggering, and free breathing, so as to provide a reference for the usage of upper abdominal DWI scanning. METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Zhuo, Jiang, Jiuming, Ouyang, Han, Xie, Lizhi, Zhao, Xinming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9579145
_version_ 1784748446367875072
author Shi, Zhuo
Jiang, Jiuming
Ouyang, Han
Xie, Lizhi
Zhao, Xinming
author_facet Shi, Zhuo
Jiang, Jiuming
Ouyang, Han
Xie, Lizhi
Zhao, Xinming
author_sort Shi, Zhuo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 1.5 T and 3.0 T upper abdominal magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) under three acquisition techniques of breath holding, breath triggering, and free breathing, so as to provide a reference for the usage of upper abdominal DWI scanning. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy subjects were selected from social volunteers and underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DWI on 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. DWI included three acquisition methods: breath triggering, breath holding, and free breathing, and b values were 100 and 800. The DWI image artifacts, image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) obtained through the three acquisition methods were compared. RESULTS: The 1.5 T free-breathing DWI image quality was the best, while the 3.0 T had the best breath-triggered DWI image quality. The 3.0 T breath-triggered DWI image quality was better than the 1.5 T free-breathing DWI image (P=0.012), and the SNR of free-breathing DWI was the highest. Between the two field intensities, the SNR of the liver in the 3.0 T group was much lower than that in the 1.5 T group, and obvious differences were not observed in ADC values of normal liver, gallbladder, kidney, spleen, and pancreas. CONCLUSION: 3.0 T respiratory-triggered acquisition can obtain higher quality DWI images. But in the case of only 1.5 T field strength, free-breathing acquisition of DWI images should be selected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9288320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92883202022-07-18 With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen Shi, Zhuo Jiang, Jiuming Ouyang, Han Xie, Lizhi Zhao, Xinming Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 1.5 T and 3.0 T upper abdominal magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) under three acquisition techniques of breath holding, breath triggering, and free breathing, so as to provide a reference for the usage of upper abdominal DWI scanning. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy subjects were selected from social volunteers and underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DWI on 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. DWI included three acquisition methods: breath triggering, breath holding, and free breathing, and b values were 100 and 800. The DWI image artifacts, image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) obtained through the three acquisition methods were compared. RESULTS: The 1.5 T free-breathing DWI image quality was the best, while the 3.0 T had the best breath-triggered DWI image quality. The 3.0 T breath-triggered DWI image quality was better than the 1.5 T free-breathing DWI image (P=0.012), and the SNR of free-breathing DWI was the highest. Between the two field intensities, the SNR of the liver in the 3.0 T group was much lower than that in the 1.5 T group, and obvious differences were not observed in ADC values of normal liver, gallbladder, kidney, spleen, and pancreas. CONCLUSION: 3.0 T respiratory-triggered acquisition can obtain higher quality DWI images. But in the case of only 1.5 T field strength, free-breathing acquisition of DWI images should be selected. Hindawi 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9288320/ /pubmed/35854769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9579145 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhuo Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shi, Zhuo
Jiang, Jiuming
Ouyang, Han
Xie, Lizhi
Zhao, Xinming
With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen
title With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen
title_full With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen
title_fullStr With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen
title_full_unstemmed With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen
title_short With 3 Types of Respiratory Acquisition: 3.0 T Respiratory Triggered Acquisition Can Obtain Higher Quality DWI Images of the Upper Abdomen
title_sort with 3 types of respiratory acquisition: 3.0 t respiratory triggered acquisition can obtain higher quality dwi images of the upper abdomen
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9579145
work_keys_str_mv AT shizhuo with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen
AT jiangjiuming with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen
AT ouyanghan with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen
AT xielizhi with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen
AT zhaoxinming with3typesofrespiratoryacquisition30trespiratorytriggeredacquisitioncanobtainhigherqualitydwiimagesoftheupperabdomen