Cargando…

Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis

AIMS: No study has evaluated the prognostic value of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification by cystatin C‐based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (CKD(Cys) classification) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to compare the prognos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuwabara, Kensuke, Zen, Kan, Yashige, Masaki, Takamatsu, Kazuaki, Ito, Nobuyasu, Kadoya, Yoshito, Yamano, Michiyo, Yamano, Tetsuhiro, Nakamura, Takeshi, Yaku, Hitoshi, Matoba, Satoaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13977
_version_ 1784748520107933696
author Kuwabara, Kensuke
Zen, Kan
Yashige, Masaki
Takamatsu, Kazuaki
Ito, Nobuyasu
Kadoya, Yoshito
Yamano, Michiyo
Yamano, Tetsuhiro
Nakamura, Takeshi
Yaku, Hitoshi
Matoba, Satoaki
author_facet Kuwabara, Kensuke
Zen, Kan
Yashige, Masaki
Takamatsu, Kazuaki
Ito, Nobuyasu
Kadoya, Yoshito
Yamano, Michiyo
Yamano, Tetsuhiro
Nakamura, Takeshi
Yaku, Hitoshi
Matoba, Satoaki
author_sort Kuwabara, Kensuke
collection PubMed
description AIMS: No study has evaluated the prognostic value of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification by cystatin C‐based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (CKD(Cys) classification) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of CKD(Cys) classification and CKD classification by creatinine‐based eGFR (CKD(Cr) classification) in risk prediction after TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed consecutive 219 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at our institute between December 2016 and June 2019. Pre‐operative CKD(Cr) and CKD(Cys) classifications were evaluated for their prognostic value of 2‐year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after TAVR. MACCE was defined as the composite of all‐cause mortality, non‐fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and rehospitalization for worsening congestive heart failure. Participants had a median age of 86.0 years and were predominantly female (76.9%). In 96.6% of the cases, TAVR was performed using transfemoral access. The median creatinine‐based eGFR (52.85 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was higher than the cystatin C‐based eGFR (41.50 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Downward reclassification in CKD stages based on eGFR(Cys) was observed in 49.0% of patients. During a median follow‐up period of 575.5 (interquartile range: 367.0–730.0) days, 58 patients presented with MACCE. CKD(Cys) classification, but not CKD(Cr) classification, significantly stratified the risk of 2‐year MACCE in patients after TAVR by log‐rank test (P = 0.003). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, only CKD(Cys) stage 3b [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.37; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28–14.91; P = 0.019] and CKD(Cys) stage 4 + 5 (HR = 3.72; 95% CI: 1.06–12.99; P = 0.040) were significant predictors of MACCE after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD(Cys) classification could better assess the risk than the CKD(Cr) classification in patients undergoing TAVR. CKD(Cys) stage 3b and stage 4 + 5 correlated with adverse outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9288764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92887642022-07-19 Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis Kuwabara, Kensuke Zen, Kan Yashige, Masaki Takamatsu, Kazuaki Ito, Nobuyasu Kadoya, Yoshito Yamano, Michiyo Yamano, Tetsuhiro Nakamura, Takeshi Yaku, Hitoshi Matoba, Satoaki ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: No study has evaluated the prognostic value of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification by cystatin C‐based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (CKD(Cys) classification) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of CKD(Cys) classification and CKD classification by creatinine‐based eGFR (CKD(Cr) classification) in risk prediction after TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed consecutive 219 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at our institute between December 2016 and June 2019. Pre‐operative CKD(Cr) and CKD(Cys) classifications were evaluated for their prognostic value of 2‐year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after TAVR. MACCE was defined as the composite of all‐cause mortality, non‐fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and rehospitalization for worsening congestive heart failure. Participants had a median age of 86.0 years and were predominantly female (76.9%). In 96.6% of the cases, TAVR was performed using transfemoral access. The median creatinine‐based eGFR (52.85 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was higher than the cystatin C‐based eGFR (41.50 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Downward reclassification in CKD stages based on eGFR(Cys) was observed in 49.0% of patients. During a median follow‐up period of 575.5 (interquartile range: 367.0–730.0) days, 58 patients presented with MACCE. CKD(Cys) classification, but not CKD(Cr) classification, significantly stratified the risk of 2‐year MACCE in patients after TAVR by log‐rank test (P = 0.003). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, only CKD(Cys) stage 3b [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.37; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28–14.91; P = 0.019] and CKD(Cys) stage 4 + 5 (HR = 3.72; 95% CI: 1.06–12.99; P = 0.040) were significant predictors of MACCE after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD(Cys) classification could better assess the risk than the CKD(Cr) classification in patients undergoing TAVR. CKD(Cys) stage 3b and stage 4 + 5 correlated with adverse outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9288764/ /pubmed/35661440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13977 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kuwabara, Kensuke
Zen, Kan
Yashige, Masaki
Takamatsu, Kazuaki
Ito, Nobuyasu
Kadoya, Yoshito
Yamano, Michiyo
Yamano, Tetsuhiro
Nakamura, Takeshi
Yaku, Hitoshi
Matoba, Satoaki
Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis
title Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis
title_full Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis
title_short Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis
title_sort cystatin c in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13977
work_keys_str_mv AT kuwabarakensuke cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT zenkan cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yashigemasaki cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT takamatsukazuaki cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT itonobuyasu cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT kadoyayoshito cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yamanomichiyo cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yamanotetsuhiro cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT nakamuratakeshi cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yakuhitoshi cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis
AT matobasatoaki cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis