Cargando…
Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis
AIMS: No study has evaluated the prognostic value of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification by cystatin C‐based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (CKD(Cys) classification) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to compare the prognos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13977 |
_version_ | 1784748520107933696 |
---|---|
author | Kuwabara, Kensuke Zen, Kan Yashige, Masaki Takamatsu, Kazuaki Ito, Nobuyasu Kadoya, Yoshito Yamano, Michiyo Yamano, Tetsuhiro Nakamura, Takeshi Yaku, Hitoshi Matoba, Satoaki |
author_facet | Kuwabara, Kensuke Zen, Kan Yashige, Masaki Takamatsu, Kazuaki Ito, Nobuyasu Kadoya, Yoshito Yamano, Michiyo Yamano, Tetsuhiro Nakamura, Takeshi Yaku, Hitoshi Matoba, Satoaki |
author_sort | Kuwabara, Kensuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: No study has evaluated the prognostic value of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification by cystatin C‐based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (CKD(Cys) classification) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of CKD(Cys) classification and CKD classification by creatinine‐based eGFR (CKD(Cr) classification) in risk prediction after TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed consecutive 219 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at our institute between December 2016 and June 2019. Pre‐operative CKD(Cr) and CKD(Cys) classifications were evaluated for their prognostic value of 2‐year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after TAVR. MACCE was defined as the composite of all‐cause mortality, non‐fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and rehospitalization for worsening congestive heart failure. Participants had a median age of 86.0 years and were predominantly female (76.9%). In 96.6% of the cases, TAVR was performed using transfemoral access. The median creatinine‐based eGFR (52.85 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was higher than the cystatin C‐based eGFR (41.50 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Downward reclassification in CKD stages based on eGFR(Cys) was observed in 49.0% of patients. During a median follow‐up period of 575.5 (interquartile range: 367.0–730.0) days, 58 patients presented with MACCE. CKD(Cys) classification, but not CKD(Cr) classification, significantly stratified the risk of 2‐year MACCE in patients after TAVR by log‐rank test (P = 0.003). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, only CKD(Cys) stage 3b [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.37; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28–14.91; P = 0.019] and CKD(Cys) stage 4 + 5 (HR = 3.72; 95% CI: 1.06–12.99; P = 0.040) were significant predictors of MACCE after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD(Cys) classification could better assess the risk than the CKD(Cr) classification in patients undergoing TAVR. CKD(Cys) stage 3b and stage 4 + 5 correlated with adverse outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9288764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92887642022-07-19 Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis Kuwabara, Kensuke Zen, Kan Yashige, Masaki Takamatsu, Kazuaki Ito, Nobuyasu Kadoya, Yoshito Yamano, Michiyo Yamano, Tetsuhiro Nakamura, Takeshi Yaku, Hitoshi Matoba, Satoaki ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: No study has evaluated the prognostic value of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification by cystatin C‐based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (CKD(Cys) classification) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of CKD(Cys) classification and CKD classification by creatinine‐based eGFR (CKD(Cr) classification) in risk prediction after TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed consecutive 219 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at our institute between December 2016 and June 2019. Pre‐operative CKD(Cr) and CKD(Cys) classifications were evaluated for their prognostic value of 2‐year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after TAVR. MACCE was defined as the composite of all‐cause mortality, non‐fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and rehospitalization for worsening congestive heart failure. Participants had a median age of 86.0 years and were predominantly female (76.9%). In 96.6% of the cases, TAVR was performed using transfemoral access. The median creatinine‐based eGFR (52.85 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was higher than the cystatin C‐based eGFR (41.50 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Downward reclassification in CKD stages based on eGFR(Cys) was observed in 49.0% of patients. During a median follow‐up period of 575.5 (interquartile range: 367.0–730.0) days, 58 patients presented with MACCE. CKD(Cys) classification, but not CKD(Cr) classification, significantly stratified the risk of 2‐year MACCE in patients after TAVR by log‐rank test (P = 0.003). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, only CKD(Cys) stage 3b [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.37; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28–14.91; P = 0.019] and CKD(Cys) stage 4 + 5 (HR = 3.72; 95% CI: 1.06–12.99; P = 0.040) were significant predictors of MACCE after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD(Cys) classification could better assess the risk than the CKD(Cr) classification in patients undergoing TAVR. CKD(Cys) stage 3b and stage 4 + 5 correlated with adverse outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9288764/ /pubmed/35661440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13977 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kuwabara, Kensuke Zen, Kan Yashige, Masaki Takamatsu, Kazuaki Ito, Nobuyasu Kadoya, Yoshito Yamano, Michiyo Yamano, Tetsuhiro Nakamura, Takeshi Yaku, Hitoshi Matoba, Satoaki Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis |
title | Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis |
title_full | Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis |
title_short | Cystatin C in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis |
title_sort | cystatin c in risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13977 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuwabarakensuke cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT zenkan cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT yashigemasaki cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT takamatsukazuaki cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT itonobuyasu cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT kadoyayoshito cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT yamanomichiyo cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT yamanotetsuhiro cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT nakamuratakeshi cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT yakuhitoshi cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis AT matobasatoaki cystatincinriskpredictionaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaretrospectiveanalysis |