Cargando…

Better outcome at lower costs after implementing a CRT‐care pathway: comprehensive evaluation of real‐world data

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires intensive, complex, and multidisciplinary care for heart failure (HF) patients. Due to limitations in time, resources, and coordination of care, in current practice, this is often incomplete. We evaluated the effect of the introduction of a CRT‐...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Stipdonk, Antonius M.W., Schretlen, Stijn, Dohmen, Wim, Knackstedt, Christian, Beckers‐Wesche, Fabienne, Debie, Luuk, Brunner‐La Rocca, Hans‐Peter, Vernooy, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13958
_version_ 1784748528870883328
author van Stipdonk, Antonius M.W.
Schretlen, Stijn
Dohmen, Wim
Knackstedt, Christian
Beckers‐Wesche, Fabienne
Debie, Luuk
Brunner‐La Rocca, Hans‐Peter
Vernooy, Kevin
author_facet van Stipdonk, Antonius M.W.
Schretlen, Stijn
Dohmen, Wim
Knackstedt, Christian
Beckers‐Wesche, Fabienne
Debie, Luuk
Brunner‐La Rocca, Hans‐Peter
Vernooy, Kevin
author_sort van Stipdonk, Antonius M.W.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires intensive, complex, and multidisciplinary care for heart failure (HF) patients. Due to limitations in time, resources, and coordination of care, in current practice, this is often incomplete. We evaluated the effect of the introduction of a CRT‐care pathway (CRT‐CPW) on clinical outcome and costs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CRT‐CPW focused on structuring CRT patient selection, implantation, and follow‐up management. To facilitate and guarantee quality, checklists were introduced. The CRT‐CPW was implemented in the Maastricht University Medical Centre in 2014. Physician‐led usual care was restructured to a nurse‐led care pathway. A retrospective comparison of data from CRT patients receiving usual care (2012–2014, 222 patients) and patients receiving care according to CRT‐CPW (2015–2018, 241 patients) was performed. The primary outcome was the composite of all‐cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Hospital‐related costs of cardiovascular care after CRT implantation were analysed to address cost‐effectiveness of the CRT‐CPW. Demographics were comparable in the usual care and CRT‐CPW groups. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the occurrence of the primary endpoint showed a significant improvement in the CRT‐CPW group (25.7% vs. 34.7%, hazard ratio 0.56; confidence interval 0.40–0.78; P < 0.005), at 36 months of follow‐up. The total costs for cardiology‐related hospitalizations were significantly reduced in the CRT‐CPW group [€17 698 (14 192–21 195) vs. 19 933 (16 980–22 991), P < 0.001]. Bootstrap cost‐effectiveness analyses showed that implementation of CRT‐CPW would be an economically dominant strategy in 90.7% of bootstrap samples. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a novel multidisciplinary, nurse‐led care pathway for CRT patients resulted in significant reduction of the combination of all‐cause mortality and HF hospitalizations, at reduced cardiovascular‐related hospital costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9288799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92887992022-07-19 Better outcome at lower costs after implementing a CRT‐care pathway: comprehensive evaluation of real‐world data van Stipdonk, Antonius M.W. Schretlen, Stijn Dohmen, Wim Knackstedt, Christian Beckers‐Wesche, Fabienne Debie, Luuk Brunner‐La Rocca, Hans‐Peter Vernooy, Kevin ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires intensive, complex, and multidisciplinary care for heart failure (HF) patients. Due to limitations in time, resources, and coordination of care, in current practice, this is often incomplete. We evaluated the effect of the introduction of a CRT‐care pathway (CRT‐CPW) on clinical outcome and costs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CRT‐CPW focused on structuring CRT patient selection, implantation, and follow‐up management. To facilitate and guarantee quality, checklists were introduced. The CRT‐CPW was implemented in the Maastricht University Medical Centre in 2014. Physician‐led usual care was restructured to a nurse‐led care pathway. A retrospective comparison of data from CRT patients receiving usual care (2012–2014, 222 patients) and patients receiving care according to CRT‐CPW (2015–2018, 241 patients) was performed. The primary outcome was the composite of all‐cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Hospital‐related costs of cardiovascular care after CRT implantation were analysed to address cost‐effectiveness of the CRT‐CPW. Demographics were comparable in the usual care and CRT‐CPW groups. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the occurrence of the primary endpoint showed a significant improvement in the CRT‐CPW group (25.7% vs. 34.7%, hazard ratio 0.56; confidence interval 0.40–0.78; P < 0.005), at 36 months of follow‐up. The total costs for cardiology‐related hospitalizations were significantly reduced in the CRT‐CPW group [€17 698 (14 192–21 195) vs. 19 933 (16 980–22 991), P < 0.001]. Bootstrap cost‐effectiveness analyses showed that implementation of CRT‐CPW would be an economically dominant strategy in 90.7% of bootstrap samples. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a novel multidisciplinary, nurse‐led care pathway for CRT patients resulted in significant reduction of the combination of all‐cause mortality and HF hospitalizations, at reduced cardiovascular‐related hospital costs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9288799/ /pubmed/35638466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13958 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van Stipdonk, Antonius M.W.
Schretlen, Stijn
Dohmen, Wim
Knackstedt, Christian
Beckers‐Wesche, Fabienne
Debie, Luuk
Brunner‐La Rocca, Hans‐Peter
Vernooy, Kevin
Better outcome at lower costs after implementing a CRT‐care pathway: comprehensive evaluation of real‐world data
title Better outcome at lower costs after implementing a CRT‐care pathway: comprehensive evaluation of real‐world data
title_full Better outcome at lower costs after implementing a CRT‐care pathway: comprehensive evaluation of real‐world data
title_fullStr Better outcome at lower costs after implementing a CRT‐care pathway: comprehensive evaluation of real‐world data
title_full_unstemmed Better outcome at lower costs after implementing a CRT‐care pathway: comprehensive evaluation of real‐world data
title_short Better outcome at lower costs after implementing a CRT‐care pathway: comprehensive evaluation of real‐world data
title_sort better outcome at lower costs after implementing a crt‐care pathway: comprehensive evaluation of real‐world data
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13958
work_keys_str_mv AT vanstipdonkantoniusmw betteroutcomeatlowercostsafterimplementingacrtcarepathwaycomprehensiveevaluationofrealworlddata
AT schretlenstijn betteroutcomeatlowercostsafterimplementingacrtcarepathwaycomprehensiveevaluationofrealworlddata
AT dohmenwim betteroutcomeatlowercostsafterimplementingacrtcarepathwaycomprehensiveevaluationofrealworlddata
AT knackstedtchristian betteroutcomeatlowercostsafterimplementingacrtcarepathwaycomprehensiveevaluationofrealworlddata
AT beckersweschefabienne betteroutcomeatlowercostsafterimplementingacrtcarepathwaycomprehensiveevaluationofrealworlddata
AT debieluuk betteroutcomeatlowercostsafterimplementingacrtcarepathwaycomprehensiveevaluationofrealworlddata
AT brunnerlaroccahanspeter betteroutcomeatlowercostsafterimplementingacrtcarepathwaycomprehensiveevaluationofrealworlddata
AT vernooykevin betteroutcomeatlowercostsafterimplementingacrtcarepathwaycomprehensiveevaluationofrealworlddata