Cargando…

Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives

OBJECTIVES: Wearable body and brain sensors are permeating the consumer market and are increasingly being considered for workplace applications with the goal of promoting safety, productivity, health, and wellness. However, the monitoring of physiologic signals in real-time prompts concerns about be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tindale, Lauren C., Chiu, Derek, Minielly, Nicole, Hrincu, Viorica, Talhouk, Aline, Illes, Judy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.800367
_version_ 1784748600955240448
author Tindale, Lauren C.
Chiu, Derek
Minielly, Nicole
Hrincu, Viorica
Talhouk, Aline
Illes, Judy
author_facet Tindale, Lauren C.
Chiu, Derek
Minielly, Nicole
Hrincu, Viorica
Talhouk, Aline
Illes, Judy
author_sort Tindale, Lauren C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Wearable body and brain sensors are permeating the consumer market and are increasingly being considered for workplace applications with the goal of promoting safety, productivity, health, and wellness. However, the monitoring of physiologic signals in real-time prompts concerns about benefit and risk, ownership of such digital data, data transfer privacy, and the discovery and disclosure of signals of possible health significance. Here we explore the perceptions and perspectives of employers and employees about key ethical considerations regarding the potential use of sensors in the workplace. METHODS: We distributed a survey developed and refined based on key research questions and past literature to a wide range and size of industries in British Columbia, Canada. Both employers (potential Implementers) and employees (potential Users) were invited to participate. RESULTS: We received 344 survey responses. Most responses were from construction, healthcare, education, government, and utilities sectors. Across genders, industries, and workplace sizes, we found a convergence of opinions on perceived benefit and concern between potential Implementers and potential Users regarding the motivation to use biosensors in the workplace. Potential Implementers and Users also agreed on issues pertaining to safety, privacy, disclosure of findings of possible medical significance, risks, data ownership, data sharing, and transfer of data between workplaces. The greatest variability between potential Users and Implementers pertained to data ownership. CONCLUSION: Strong agreement in the perception of biosensor use in the workplace between potential Implementers and Users reflects shared interest, motivation, and responsibility for their use. The use of sensors is rapidly increasing, and transparency about key use factors–both practical and ethical–is essential to maintain the current and desirable level of solidarity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9289157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92891572022-07-19 Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives Tindale, Lauren C. Chiu, Derek Minielly, Nicole Hrincu, Viorica Talhouk, Aline Illes, Judy Front Digit Health Digital Health OBJECTIVES: Wearable body and brain sensors are permeating the consumer market and are increasingly being considered for workplace applications with the goal of promoting safety, productivity, health, and wellness. However, the monitoring of physiologic signals in real-time prompts concerns about benefit and risk, ownership of such digital data, data transfer privacy, and the discovery and disclosure of signals of possible health significance. Here we explore the perceptions and perspectives of employers and employees about key ethical considerations regarding the potential use of sensors in the workplace. METHODS: We distributed a survey developed and refined based on key research questions and past literature to a wide range and size of industries in British Columbia, Canada. Both employers (potential Implementers) and employees (potential Users) were invited to participate. RESULTS: We received 344 survey responses. Most responses were from construction, healthcare, education, government, and utilities sectors. Across genders, industries, and workplace sizes, we found a convergence of opinions on perceived benefit and concern between potential Implementers and potential Users regarding the motivation to use biosensors in the workplace. Potential Implementers and Users also agreed on issues pertaining to safety, privacy, disclosure of findings of possible medical significance, risks, data ownership, data sharing, and transfer of data between workplaces. The greatest variability between potential Users and Implementers pertained to data ownership. CONCLUSION: Strong agreement in the perception of biosensor use in the workplace between potential Implementers and Users reflects shared interest, motivation, and responsibility for their use. The use of sensors is rapidly increasing, and transparency about key use factors–both practical and ethical–is essential to maintain the current and desirable level of solidarity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9289157/ /pubmed/35860688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.800367 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tindale, Chiu, Minielly, Hrincu, Talhouk and Illes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Digital Health
Tindale, Lauren C.
Chiu, Derek
Minielly, Nicole
Hrincu, Viorica
Talhouk, Aline
Illes, Judy
Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives
title Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives
title_full Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives
title_fullStr Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives
title_short Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives
title_sort wearable biosensors in the workplace: perceptions and perspectives
topic Digital Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.800367
work_keys_str_mv AT tindalelaurenc wearablebiosensorsintheworkplaceperceptionsandperspectives
AT chiuderek wearablebiosensorsintheworkplaceperceptionsandperspectives
AT miniellynicole wearablebiosensorsintheworkplaceperceptionsandperspectives
AT hrincuviorica wearablebiosensorsintheworkplaceperceptionsandperspectives
AT talhoukaline wearablebiosensorsintheworkplaceperceptionsandperspectives
AT illesjudy wearablebiosensorsintheworkplaceperceptionsandperspectives