Cargando…

Effectiveness and Safety of Rifaximin-Containing Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Systematic Review – Are They Potential Eradication Regimens?

BACKGROUND: Rifaximin, a rifamycin antibiotic, is widely used to treat infectious diarrhea but not commonly used in H. pylori eradication. With its potential advantages of the agent, some studies were conducted on this topic. The aim of this study is to assess effectiveness and safety of rifaximin-c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yu, Tang, Jiong, Zhou, Su, Liang, Tian-Tian, Wang, Fang-Fang, Ning, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859911
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S371131
_version_ 1784748604820291584
author Wang, Yu
Tang, Jiong
Zhou, Su
Liang, Tian-Tian
Wang, Fang-Fang
Ning, Hong
author_facet Wang, Yu
Tang, Jiong
Zhou, Su
Liang, Tian-Tian
Wang, Fang-Fang
Ning, Hong
author_sort Wang, Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rifaximin, a rifamycin antibiotic, is widely used to treat infectious diarrhea but not commonly used in H. pylori eradication. With its potential advantages of the agent, some studies were conducted on this topic. The aim of this study is to assess effectiveness and safety of rifaximin-containing regimens and to evaluate whether they are alternative choices for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: Scientific databases including PubMed, EMbase and Cochrane Library were used to identify clinical trials on rifaximin-containing regimens published from January 2000 to October 2021. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA12 were adopted for the systematic review. RESULTS: In this study, totally 1025 patients were included from 3 randomized controlled and 9 single-arm studies. It showed that the differences in effectiveness and safety between rifaximin-containing and first-line regimens were not statistically significant in randomized controlled trials. However, the results of the single-arm trials indicated that the eradication and adverse drug reaction rate varied suggesting data instability (r=38.1%-85.4%, r(ADR) 0.00–67.5% by ITT analysis). Among them, the eradication rate of pediatric patients (r=85.4% by ITT analysis) was higher than that of adult patients (r=38.1–74.5% by ITT analysis). Meanwhile, in all adult subgroups (triple or quadruple, with or without amoxicillin, different duration and rifaximin dose), the results did not show sufficient effectiveness as all the eradication rates did not meet the minimum ideal or ideal target. CONCLUSION: Taken together, rifaximin-containing regimens should not be recommended for H. pylori eradication as they cannot achieve the eradication rate desired.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9289174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92891742022-07-19 Effectiveness and Safety of Rifaximin-Containing Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Systematic Review – Are They Potential Eradication Regimens? Wang, Yu Tang, Jiong Zhou, Su Liang, Tian-Tian Wang, Fang-Fang Ning, Hong Infect Drug Resist Review BACKGROUND: Rifaximin, a rifamycin antibiotic, is widely used to treat infectious diarrhea but not commonly used in H. pylori eradication. With its potential advantages of the agent, some studies were conducted on this topic. The aim of this study is to assess effectiveness and safety of rifaximin-containing regimens and to evaluate whether they are alternative choices for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: Scientific databases including PubMed, EMbase and Cochrane Library were used to identify clinical trials on rifaximin-containing regimens published from January 2000 to October 2021. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA12 were adopted for the systematic review. RESULTS: In this study, totally 1025 patients were included from 3 randomized controlled and 9 single-arm studies. It showed that the differences in effectiveness and safety between rifaximin-containing and first-line regimens were not statistically significant in randomized controlled trials. However, the results of the single-arm trials indicated that the eradication and adverse drug reaction rate varied suggesting data instability (r=38.1%-85.4%, r(ADR) 0.00–67.5% by ITT analysis). Among them, the eradication rate of pediatric patients (r=85.4% by ITT analysis) was higher than that of adult patients (r=38.1–74.5% by ITT analysis). Meanwhile, in all adult subgroups (triple or quadruple, with or without amoxicillin, different duration and rifaximin dose), the results did not show sufficient effectiveness as all the eradication rates did not meet the minimum ideal or ideal target. CONCLUSION: Taken together, rifaximin-containing regimens should not be recommended for H. pylori eradication as they cannot achieve the eradication rate desired. Dove 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9289174/ /pubmed/35859911 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S371131 Text en © 2022 Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Yu
Tang, Jiong
Zhou, Su
Liang, Tian-Tian
Wang, Fang-Fang
Ning, Hong
Effectiveness and Safety of Rifaximin-Containing Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Systematic Review – Are They Potential Eradication Regimens?
title Effectiveness and Safety of Rifaximin-Containing Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Systematic Review – Are They Potential Eradication Regimens?
title_full Effectiveness and Safety of Rifaximin-Containing Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Systematic Review – Are They Potential Eradication Regimens?
title_fullStr Effectiveness and Safety of Rifaximin-Containing Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Systematic Review – Are They Potential Eradication Regimens?
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and Safety of Rifaximin-Containing Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Systematic Review – Are They Potential Eradication Regimens?
title_short Effectiveness and Safety of Rifaximin-Containing Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Systematic Review – Are They Potential Eradication Regimens?
title_sort effectiveness and safety of rifaximin-containing regimens for helicobacter pylori eradication: systematic review – are they potential eradication regimens?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859911
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S371131
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyu effectivenessandsafetyofrifaximincontainingregimensforhelicobacterpylorieradicationsystematicreviewaretheypotentialeradicationregimens
AT tangjiong effectivenessandsafetyofrifaximincontainingregimensforhelicobacterpylorieradicationsystematicreviewaretheypotentialeradicationregimens
AT zhousu effectivenessandsafetyofrifaximincontainingregimensforhelicobacterpylorieradicationsystematicreviewaretheypotentialeradicationregimens
AT liangtiantian effectivenessandsafetyofrifaximincontainingregimensforhelicobacterpylorieradicationsystematicreviewaretheypotentialeradicationregimens
AT wangfangfang effectivenessandsafetyofrifaximincontainingregimensforhelicobacterpylorieradicationsystematicreviewaretheypotentialeradicationregimens
AT ninghong effectivenessandsafetyofrifaximincontainingregimensforhelicobacterpylorieradicationsystematicreviewaretheypotentialeradicationregimens