Cargando…
Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation
OBJECTIVES: ANCA-vasculitis (AAV) patients frequently suffer from relapses and risk subsequent organ damage. There is much debate on the value of serial ANCA level evaluation to monitor disease activity. We aimed to evaluate the association between ANCA rises and disease relapses at (I) moment of th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.844112 |
_version_ | 1784748613120819200 |
---|---|
author | Al-Soudi, Aram Vegting, Yosta Klarenbeek, Paul L. Hilhorst, Marc L. |
author_facet | Al-Soudi, Aram Vegting, Yosta Klarenbeek, Paul L. Hilhorst, Marc L. |
author_sort | Al-Soudi, Aram |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: ANCA-vasculitis (AAV) patients frequently suffer from relapses and risk subsequent organ damage. There is much debate on the value of serial ANCA level evaluation to monitor disease activity. We aimed to evaluate the association between ANCA rises and disease relapses at (I) moment of the rise, (II) within 6 months or (III) within a year from the rise. METHODS: 3 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE) were searched from 1993 through September 2021. We included studies that reported relapse incidence within 12 months after an ANCA rise measured by antigen-specific immunoassays in peripheral blood of AAV patients in remission. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2. Finally, a meta-analysis was carried out to estimate average OR using a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty unique studies were included. The methodological quality was limited due to risk of selection bias. An ANCA rise often preceded a disease relapse within 6 months (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.66–8.03) and less often within 12 months (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.21–6.88), while it was not indicative of a concurrent relapse (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03–0.53). Once a relapse is diagnosed, ANCA is significantly more often present than not (OR 10.80, 95% CI 3.82–30.55). As expected based on clinical, technical and methodological variability between studies, there was substantial heterogeneity across studies in all analyses (I2 = 70–87%). CONCLUSION: In previously ANCA-positive patients, the ANCA test is often positive upon clinical suspicion of a disease relapse. Patients with a rise in ANCA are at risk of encountering disease relapses in the upcoming 6 or 12 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9289208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92892082022-07-19 Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation Al-Soudi, Aram Vegting, Yosta Klarenbeek, Paul L. Hilhorst, Marc L. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine OBJECTIVES: ANCA-vasculitis (AAV) patients frequently suffer from relapses and risk subsequent organ damage. There is much debate on the value of serial ANCA level evaluation to monitor disease activity. We aimed to evaluate the association between ANCA rises and disease relapses at (I) moment of the rise, (II) within 6 months or (III) within a year from the rise. METHODS: 3 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE) were searched from 1993 through September 2021. We included studies that reported relapse incidence within 12 months after an ANCA rise measured by antigen-specific immunoassays in peripheral blood of AAV patients in remission. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2. Finally, a meta-analysis was carried out to estimate average OR using a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty unique studies were included. The methodological quality was limited due to risk of selection bias. An ANCA rise often preceded a disease relapse within 6 months (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.66–8.03) and less often within 12 months (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.21–6.88), while it was not indicative of a concurrent relapse (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03–0.53). Once a relapse is diagnosed, ANCA is significantly more often present than not (OR 10.80, 95% CI 3.82–30.55). As expected based on clinical, technical and methodological variability between studies, there was substantial heterogeneity across studies in all analyses (I2 = 70–87%). CONCLUSION: In previously ANCA-positive patients, the ANCA test is often positive upon clinical suspicion of a disease relapse. Patients with a rise in ANCA are at risk of encountering disease relapses in the upcoming 6 or 12 months. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9289208/ /pubmed/35860735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.844112 Text en Copyright © 2022 Al-Soudi, Vegting, Klarenbeek and Hilhorst. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Al-Soudi, Aram Vegting, Yosta Klarenbeek, Paul L. Hilhorst, Marc L. Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation |
title | Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation |
title_full | Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation |
title_short | Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation |
title_sort | do relapses follow anca rises? a systematic review and meta-analysis on the value of serial anca level evaluation |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.844112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alsoudiaram dorelapsesfollowancarisesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonthevalueofserialancalevelevaluation AT vegtingyosta dorelapsesfollowancarisesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonthevalueofserialancalevelevaluation AT klarenbeekpaull dorelapsesfollowancarisesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonthevalueofserialancalevelevaluation AT hilhorstmarcl dorelapsesfollowancarisesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonthevalueofserialancalevelevaluation |