Cargando…
Non‐Invasive imaging of extracellular vesicles: Quo vaditis in vivo?
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid‐bilayer delimited vesicles released by nearly all cell types that serve as mediators of intercellular signalling. Recent evidence has shown that EVs play a key role in many normal as well as pathological cellular processes. EVs can be exploited as disease bioma...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35844061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12241 |
_version_ | 1784748614792249344 |
---|---|
author | Arifin, Dian R. Witwer, Kenneth W. Bulte, Jeff W. M. |
author_facet | Arifin, Dian R. Witwer, Kenneth W. Bulte, Jeff W. M. |
author_sort | Arifin, Dian R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid‐bilayer delimited vesicles released by nearly all cell types that serve as mediators of intercellular signalling. Recent evidence has shown that EVs play a key role in many normal as well as pathological cellular processes. EVs can be exploited as disease biomarkers and also as targeted, cell‐free therapeutic delivery and signalling vehicles for use in regenerative medicine and other clinical settings. Despite this potential, much remains unknown about the in vivo biodistribution and pharmacokinetic profiles of EVs after administration into living subjects. The ability to non‐invasively image exogeneous EVs, especially in larger animals, will allow a better understanding of their in vivo homing and retention patterns, blood and tissue half‐life, and excretion pathways, all of which are needed to advance clinical diagnostic and/or therapeutic applications of EVs. We present the current state‐of‐the‐art methods for labeling EVs with various diagnostic contrast agents and tracers and the respective imaging modalities that can be used for their in vivo visualization: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X‐ray computed tomography (CT) imaging, magnetic particle imaging (MPI), single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and optical imaging (fluorescence and bioluminescence imaging). We review here the strengths and weaknesses of each of these EV imaging approaches, with special emphasis on clinical translation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9289215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92892152022-07-20 Non‐Invasive imaging of extracellular vesicles: Quo vaditis in vivo? Arifin, Dian R. Witwer, Kenneth W. Bulte, Jeff W. M. J Extracell Vesicles Review Articles Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid‐bilayer delimited vesicles released by nearly all cell types that serve as mediators of intercellular signalling. Recent evidence has shown that EVs play a key role in many normal as well as pathological cellular processes. EVs can be exploited as disease biomarkers and also as targeted, cell‐free therapeutic delivery and signalling vehicles for use in regenerative medicine and other clinical settings. Despite this potential, much remains unknown about the in vivo biodistribution and pharmacokinetic profiles of EVs after administration into living subjects. The ability to non‐invasively image exogeneous EVs, especially in larger animals, will allow a better understanding of their in vivo homing and retention patterns, blood and tissue half‐life, and excretion pathways, all of which are needed to advance clinical diagnostic and/or therapeutic applications of EVs. We present the current state‐of‐the‐art methods for labeling EVs with various diagnostic contrast agents and tracers and the respective imaging modalities that can be used for their in vivo visualization: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X‐ray computed tomography (CT) imaging, magnetic particle imaging (MPI), single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and optical imaging (fluorescence and bioluminescence imaging). We review here the strengths and weaknesses of each of these EV imaging approaches, with special emphasis on clinical translation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-17 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9289215/ /pubmed/35844061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12241 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Arifin, Dian R. Witwer, Kenneth W. Bulte, Jeff W. M. Non‐Invasive imaging of extracellular vesicles: Quo vaditis in vivo? |
title | Non‐Invasive imaging of extracellular vesicles: Quo vaditis in vivo? |
title_full | Non‐Invasive imaging of extracellular vesicles: Quo vaditis in vivo? |
title_fullStr | Non‐Invasive imaging of extracellular vesicles: Quo vaditis in vivo? |
title_full_unstemmed | Non‐Invasive imaging of extracellular vesicles: Quo vaditis in vivo? |
title_short | Non‐Invasive imaging of extracellular vesicles: Quo vaditis in vivo? |
title_sort | non‐invasive imaging of extracellular vesicles: quo vaditis in vivo? |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35844061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arifindianr noninvasiveimagingofextracellularvesiclesquovaditisinvivo AT witwerkennethw noninvasiveimagingofextracellularvesiclesquovaditisinvivo AT bultejeffwm noninvasiveimagingofextracellularvesiclesquovaditisinvivo |