Cargando…
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument
Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is considered an emergency life-threatening situation. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on how to manage hypothermia, based on evidence and expert opinions, could save lives. This systematic review assessed and compared the most recently approved internationa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103887 |
_version_ | 1784748616511913984 |
---|---|
author | Babiker Mohamed, Mohamed Ali Abdelwahab Abdelkarim, Wael Ahmed Salih Aabdeen, Mohamed Abdulmonem Elobid Ahmed, Tarig Hassan Sarsour, Hassan H.H. El-Malky, Ahmed M. Amer, Yasser S. alsaleh, Nuha Nazer, Rakan I. |
author_facet | Babiker Mohamed, Mohamed Ali Abdelwahab Abdelkarim, Wael Ahmed Salih Aabdeen, Mohamed Abdulmonem Elobid Ahmed, Tarig Hassan Sarsour, Hassan H.H. El-Malky, Ahmed M. Amer, Yasser S. alsaleh, Nuha Nazer, Rakan I. |
author_sort | Babiker Mohamed, Mohamed Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is considered an emergency life-threatening situation. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on how to manage hypothermia, based on evidence and expert opinions, could save lives. This systematic review assessed and compared the most recently approved international CPGs with the AGREE II instrument. We searched international bibliographic databases to identify relevant guidelines for managing perioperative hypothermia. Four independent reviewers (consultant anesthesiologists) critically appraised the selected guidelines with the AGREE II instrument. We analyzed inter-rater agreement and calculated an intra-class correlation coefficient (Kappa). We identified five CPGs for perioperative hypothermia that were eligible for critical appraisal. These CPGs were issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE-2016); the American Society of Peri-Anesthesia Nurses/Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (ASPAN/AHRQ-2006); the University of Southern Mississippi (USM/CPG-2017); The University Assistance Complex of Salamanca (UACS/CPG-2018); and the Justus-Liebig University of Giessen (UKGM/CPG-2015). The overall assessments of NICE-2016 and ASPAN/AHRQ-2006 scored >80%. These results were consistent with high scores achieved in the six domains of AGREE II: (1) scope and purpose, (2) stakeholder involvement, (3) rigor of development, (4) clarity of presentation, (5) applicability, and (6) editorial independence domains. The NICE-2016, ASPAN/AHRQ-2006, and USM/CPG-2017) scored, respectively, 94%, 81%, and 70% for domain 3, 91%, 87%, and 66% for domain 5, and 90%, 82%, and 77% for domain 6. Generally, the NICE CPGs received significantly better clinical recommendations. However, all five evidence-based CPGs were of high methodological quality and were recommended for use in practice. Saudi Arabia should formulate its own national CPGs for diagnosis and management of perioperative hypothermia and to be published on NICE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9289222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92892222022-07-19 Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument Babiker Mohamed, Mohamed Ali Abdelwahab Abdelkarim, Wael Ahmed Salih Aabdeen, Mohamed Abdulmonem Elobid Ahmed, Tarig Hassan Sarsour, Hassan H.H. El-Malky, Ahmed M. Amer, Yasser S. alsaleh, Nuha Nazer, Rakan I. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Systematic Review / Meta-analysis Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is considered an emergency life-threatening situation. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on how to manage hypothermia, based on evidence and expert opinions, could save lives. This systematic review assessed and compared the most recently approved international CPGs with the AGREE II instrument. We searched international bibliographic databases to identify relevant guidelines for managing perioperative hypothermia. Four independent reviewers (consultant anesthesiologists) critically appraised the selected guidelines with the AGREE II instrument. We analyzed inter-rater agreement and calculated an intra-class correlation coefficient (Kappa). We identified five CPGs for perioperative hypothermia that were eligible for critical appraisal. These CPGs were issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE-2016); the American Society of Peri-Anesthesia Nurses/Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (ASPAN/AHRQ-2006); the University of Southern Mississippi (USM/CPG-2017); The University Assistance Complex of Salamanca (UACS/CPG-2018); and the Justus-Liebig University of Giessen (UKGM/CPG-2015). The overall assessments of NICE-2016 and ASPAN/AHRQ-2006 scored >80%. These results were consistent with high scores achieved in the six domains of AGREE II: (1) scope and purpose, (2) stakeholder involvement, (3) rigor of development, (4) clarity of presentation, (5) applicability, and (6) editorial independence domains. The NICE-2016, ASPAN/AHRQ-2006, and USM/CPG-2017) scored, respectively, 94%, 81%, and 70% for domain 3, 91%, 87%, and 66% for domain 5, and 90%, 82%, and 77% for domain 6. Generally, the NICE CPGs received significantly better clinical recommendations. However, all five evidence-based CPGs were of high methodological quality and were recommended for use in practice. Saudi Arabia should formulate its own national CPGs for diagnosis and management of perioperative hypothermia and to be published on NICE. Elsevier 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9289222/ /pubmed/35860110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103887 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review / Meta-analysis Babiker Mohamed, Mohamed Ali Abdelwahab Abdelkarim, Wael Ahmed Salih Aabdeen, Mohamed Abdulmonem Elobid Ahmed, Tarig Hassan Sarsour, Hassan H.H. El-Malky, Ahmed M. Amer, Yasser S. alsaleh, Nuha Nazer, Rakan I. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument |
title | Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument |
title_full | Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument |
title_fullStr | Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument |
title_short | Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument |
title_sort | evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the agree ii instrument |
topic | Systematic Review / Meta-analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103887 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT babikermohamedmohamedali evidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofperioperativehypothermiasystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandqualityassessmentwiththeagreeiiinstrument AT abdelwahababdelkarimwaelahmed evidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofperioperativehypothermiasystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandqualityassessmentwiththeagreeiiinstrument AT salihaabdeenmohamedabdulmonem evidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofperioperativehypothermiasystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandqualityassessmentwiththeagreeiiinstrument AT elobidahmedtarighassan evidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofperioperativehypothermiasystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandqualityassessmentwiththeagreeiiinstrument AT sarsourhassanhh evidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofperioperativehypothermiasystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandqualityassessmentwiththeagreeiiinstrument AT elmalkyahmedm evidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofperioperativehypothermiasystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandqualityassessmentwiththeagreeiiinstrument AT ameryassers evidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofperioperativehypothermiasystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandqualityassessmentwiththeagreeiiinstrument AT alsalehnuha evidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofperioperativehypothermiasystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandqualityassessmentwiththeagreeiiinstrument AT nazerrakani evidencebasedclinicalpracticeguidelinesforthemanagementofperioperativehypothermiasystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandqualityassessmentwiththeagreeiiinstrument |