Cargando…

Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 298 Patients Based on the ISGPS Definition and Grading System

BACKGROUND: The definition and grading system of post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) has recently been proposed by ISGPS. This study aimed to put this definition and classification into practice and investigate the potential risk factors and clinical impacts of PPAP. METHODS: Demographic a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Shuai, Wu, Hanxue, Xu, Guiping, Zhao, Yaling, Xue, Feng, Dong, Shunbin, Han, Liang, Wang, Zheng, Wu, Zheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860201
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.916486
_version_ 1784748621230505984
author Wu, Shuai
Wu, Hanxue
Xu, Guiping
Zhao, Yaling
Xue, Feng
Dong, Shunbin
Han, Liang
Wang, Zheng
Wu, Zheng
author_facet Wu, Shuai
Wu, Hanxue
Xu, Guiping
Zhao, Yaling
Xue, Feng
Dong, Shunbin
Han, Liang
Wang, Zheng
Wu, Zheng
author_sort Wu, Shuai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The definition and grading system of post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) has recently been proposed by ISGPS. This study aimed to put this definition and classification into practice and investigate the potential risk factors and clinical impacts of PPAP. METHODS: Demographic and perioperative data of consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) from January 2019 to July 2021 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic criteria of PPAP published by ISGPS, consisting of biochemical, radiologic, and clinical parameters, were adopted. The risk factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 298 patients were enrolled in this study, and the total incidence of PPAP was 52.4% (150 patients). Stratified by clinical impacts of PPAP, the incidences of grades B and C PPAP were 48.9% and 3.5%, respectively. PPAP after PD was significantly associated with pancreatic fistula and other unfavorable complications. Soft pancreatic texture (OR 3.0) and CRP ≥ 180 mg/L (OR 3.6) were the independent predictors of PPAP, AUC 0.613. Stratified by the grade of PPAP, soft pancreatic texture (OR 2.7) and CRP ≥ 180 mg/L (OR 3.4) were the independent predictors of grade B PPAP, and soft pancreatic texture (OR 19.3), operation duration >360 min (OR 13.8), and the pancreatic anastomosis by using conventional duct to mucosa methods (OR 10.4) were the independent predictors of grade C PPAP. PPAP complicated with pancreatic fistula significantly increased the severe complications and mortality compared to only PPAP occurrence. CONCLUSION: PPAP was not an uncommon complication after PD and was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes, especially since it was complicated with pancreatic fistula. Soft pancreatic texture and CRP ≥ 180 mg/L were the independent predictors of PPAP. Higher-volume multicenter and prospective studies are strongly needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9289243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92892432022-07-19 Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 298 Patients Based on the ISGPS Definition and Grading System Wu, Shuai Wu, Hanxue Xu, Guiping Zhao, Yaling Xue, Feng Dong, Shunbin Han, Liang Wang, Zheng Wu, Zheng Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: The definition and grading system of post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) has recently been proposed by ISGPS. This study aimed to put this definition and classification into practice and investigate the potential risk factors and clinical impacts of PPAP. METHODS: Demographic and perioperative data of consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) from January 2019 to July 2021 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic criteria of PPAP published by ISGPS, consisting of biochemical, radiologic, and clinical parameters, were adopted. The risk factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 298 patients were enrolled in this study, and the total incidence of PPAP was 52.4% (150 patients). Stratified by clinical impacts of PPAP, the incidences of grades B and C PPAP were 48.9% and 3.5%, respectively. PPAP after PD was significantly associated with pancreatic fistula and other unfavorable complications. Soft pancreatic texture (OR 3.0) and CRP ≥ 180 mg/L (OR 3.6) were the independent predictors of PPAP, AUC 0.613. Stratified by the grade of PPAP, soft pancreatic texture (OR 2.7) and CRP ≥ 180 mg/L (OR 3.4) were the independent predictors of grade B PPAP, and soft pancreatic texture (OR 19.3), operation duration >360 min (OR 13.8), and the pancreatic anastomosis by using conventional duct to mucosa methods (OR 10.4) were the independent predictors of grade C PPAP. PPAP complicated with pancreatic fistula significantly increased the severe complications and mortality compared to only PPAP occurrence. CONCLUSION: PPAP was not an uncommon complication after PD and was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes, especially since it was complicated with pancreatic fistula. Soft pancreatic texture and CRP ≥ 180 mg/L were the independent predictors of PPAP. Higher-volume multicenter and prospective studies are strongly needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9289243/ /pubmed/35860201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.916486 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wu, Wu, Xu, Zhao, Xue, Dong, Han, Wang and Wu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Wu, Shuai
Wu, Hanxue
Xu, Guiping
Zhao, Yaling
Xue, Feng
Dong, Shunbin
Han, Liang
Wang, Zheng
Wu, Zheng
Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 298 Patients Based on the ISGPS Definition and Grading System
title Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 298 Patients Based on the ISGPS Definition and Grading System
title_full Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 298 Patients Based on the ISGPS Definition and Grading System
title_fullStr Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 298 Patients Based on the ISGPS Definition and Grading System
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 298 Patients Based on the ISGPS Definition and Grading System
title_short Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 298 Patients Based on the ISGPS Definition and Grading System
title_sort risk factors and clinical impacts of post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis of 298 patients based on the isgps definition and grading system
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860201
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.916486
work_keys_str_mv AT wushuai riskfactorsandclinicalimpactsofpostpancreatectomyacutepancreatitisafterpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisof298patientsbasedontheisgpsdefinitionandgradingsystem
AT wuhanxue riskfactorsandclinicalimpactsofpostpancreatectomyacutepancreatitisafterpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisof298patientsbasedontheisgpsdefinitionandgradingsystem
AT xuguiping riskfactorsandclinicalimpactsofpostpancreatectomyacutepancreatitisafterpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisof298patientsbasedontheisgpsdefinitionandgradingsystem
AT zhaoyaling riskfactorsandclinicalimpactsofpostpancreatectomyacutepancreatitisafterpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisof298patientsbasedontheisgpsdefinitionandgradingsystem
AT xuefeng riskfactorsandclinicalimpactsofpostpancreatectomyacutepancreatitisafterpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisof298patientsbasedontheisgpsdefinitionandgradingsystem
AT dongshunbin riskfactorsandclinicalimpactsofpostpancreatectomyacutepancreatitisafterpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisof298patientsbasedontheisgpsdefinitionandgradingsystem
AT hanliang riskfactorsandclinicalimpactsofpostpancreatectomyacutepancreatitisafterpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisof298patientsbasedontheisgpsdefinitionandgradingsystem
AT wangzheng riskfactorsandclinicalimpactsofpostpancreatectomyacutepancreatitisafterpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisof298patientsbasedontheisgpsdefinitionandgradingsystem
AT wuzheng riskfactorsandclinicalimpactsofpostpancreatectomyacutepancreatitisafterpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysisof298patientsbasedontheisgpsdefinitionandgradingsystem