Cargando…
Comparison of ADVIA Centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin I in serum
Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a standard biomarker for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). While older, ultra-sensitive cTnI (us-cTnI) assays use the 99th percentile as the reference threshold, newer high-sensitive cTnI (hs-cTnI) assays use the limit of detection or functional sensiti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00293 |
_version_ | 1784748731094007808 |
---|---|
author | Osredkar, Joško Fabjan, Teja Kumer, Kristina Tršan, Jure Poljančič, Laura Košir, Miha Vovk, Pia Snoj, Nada Finderle, Petra Možina, Hugon |
author_facet | Osredkar, Joško Fabjan, Teja Kumer, Kristina Tršan, Jure Poljančič, Laura Košir, Miha Vovk, Pia Snoj, Nada Finderle, Petra Možina, Hugon |
author_sort | Osredkar, Joško |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a standard biomarker for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). While older, ultra-sensitive cTnI (us-cTnI) assays use the 99th percentile as the reference threshold, newer high-sensitive cTnI (hs-cTnI) assays use the limit of detection or functional sensitivity instead. However, little has been done to systematically compare these two methods. The present study also served as a validation of hs-cTnI in our laboratory. Here, we compared the results obtained from the blood serum obtained from 8810 patients using the us-cTnI and the hs-cTnI assays run in tandem on the ADVIA Centaur XP analyser. We found that in 2279 samples the concentration of cTnI measured with the ultra-sensitive method was below the detection limit, while with the high-sensitive method, only 540 were below the detection limit. We also compared results from these assays with the ultimate diagnosis of a subset of individuals. The analysis of the results below cut-off with the ultra-sensitive method showed that this method would not detect 96 cases related to heart disorder. Overall, the main finding of our research is that hs-cTnI is the preferable option and is able to be deployed effectively in the laboratory setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9289728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92897282022-07-19 Comparison of ADVIA Centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin I in serum Osredkar, Joško Fabjan, Teja Kumer, Kristina Tršan, Jure Poljančič, Laura Košir, Miha Vovk, Pia Snoj, Nada Finderle, Petra Možina, Hugon Pract Lab Med Original Research Article Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a standard biomarker for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). While older, ultra-sensitive cTnI (us-cTnI) assays use the 99th percentile as the reference threshold, newer high-sensitive cTnI (hs-cTnI) assays use the limit of detection or functional sensitivity instead. However, little has been done to systematically compare these two methods. The present study also served as a validation of hs-cTnI in our laboratory. Here, we compared the results obtained from the blood serum obtained from 8810 patients using the us-cTnI and the hs-cTnI assays run in tandem on the ADVIA Centaur XP analyser. We found that in 2279 samples the concentration of cTnI measured with the ultra-sensitive method was below the detection limit, while with the high-sensitive method, only 540 were below the detection limit. We also compared results from these assays with the ultimate diagnosis of a subset of individuals. The analysis of the results below cut-off with the ultra-sensitive method showed that this method would not detect 96 cases related to heart disorder. Overall, the main finding of our research is that hs-cTnI is the preferable option and is able to be deployed effectively in the laboratory setting. Elsevier 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9289728/ /pubmed/35860388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00293 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Osredkar, Joško Fabjan, Teja Kumer, Kristina Tršan, Jure Poljančič, Laura Košir, Miha Vovk, Pia Snoj, Nada Finderle, Petra Možina, Hugon Comparison of ADVIA Centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin I in serum |
title | Comparison of ADVIA Centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin I in serum |
title_full | Comparison of ADVIA Centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin I in serum |
title_fullStr | Comparison of ADVIA Centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin I in serum |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of ADVIA Centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin I in serum |
title_short | Comparison of ADVIA Centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin I in serum |
title_sort | comparison of advia centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin i in serum |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT osredkarjosko comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum AT fabjanteja comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum AT kumerkristina comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum AT trsanjure comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum AT poljanciclaura comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum AT kosirmiha comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum AT vovkpia comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum AT snojnada comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum AT finderlepetra comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum AT mozinahugon comparisonofadviacentaurultrasensitiveandhighsensitiveassaysfortroponiniinserum |