Cargando…

Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease

INTRODUCTION: People with Parkinson’s disease (PWPD) experience negative feelings, thoughts, and coping behaviors due to the experienced communication challenges. This study aimed to compare the perceptions of PWPD with those of proxies for the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions specific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thijs, Zoë, Zhang, Yan, Van Lierde, Kristiane, Vanryckeghem, Martine, Watts, Christopher R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100152
_version_ 1784748732257927168
author Thijs, Zoë
Zhang, Yan
Van Lierde, Kristiane
Vanryckeghem, Martine
Watts, Christopher R.
author_facet Thijs, Zoë
Zhang, Yan
Van Lierde, Kristiane
Vanryckeghem, Martine
Watts, Christopher R.
author_sort Thijs, Zoë
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: People with Parkinson’s disease (PWPD) experience negative feelings, thoughts, and coping behaviors due to the experienced communication challenges. This study aimed to compare the perceptions of PWPD with those of proxies for the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions specific to voice production during communicative interactions. METHODS: The Behavior Assessment Battery – Voice (BAB-Voice) was administered to 31 PWPD and their close communication partner/proxy. The BAB-Voice contained four subtests: Speech Situation Checklist – Emotional Reaction (SSC-ER), Speech Situation Checklist – Speech Disruption (SSC-SD), Behavior Checklist (BCL), and Communication Attitude Test for Adults (BigCAT). The scores for each of these subtests were calculated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A repeated measures MANOVA did not find statistically significant differences between the subscores of PWPD and proxies (Pillai’s trace = 0.25, F[4] = 2.22, p =.094, η(p)(2) = 0.25). Fair to excellent agreement between the PWPD and proxies was found. The highest agreement was found on the BigCAT (ICC = 0.80). The SSC-SD (ICC = 0.77) and SSC-ER (ICC = 0.71) still showed excellent agreement, while only fair agreement was found for the BCL (ICC = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Proxies were able to identify the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in PWPD. Communication partners close to the PWPD could, therefore, provide valuable information regarding the assessment and treatment of hypophonia in PD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9289734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92897342022-07-19 Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease Thijs, Zoë Zhang, Yan Van Lierde, Kristiane Vanryckeghem, Martine Watts, Christopher R. Clin Park Relat Disord Original Articles INTRODUCTION: People with Parkinson’s disease (PWPD) experience negative feelings, thoughts, and coping behaviors due to the experienced communication challenges. This study aimed to compare the perceptions of PWPD with those of proxies for the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions specific to voice production during communicative interactions. METHODS: The Behavior Assessment Battery – Voice (BAB-Voice) was administered to 31 PWPD and their close communication partner/proxy. The BAB-Voice contained four subtests: Speech Situation Checklist – Emotional Reaction (SSC-ER), Speech Situation Checklist – Speech Disruption (SSC-SD), Behavior Checklist (BCL), and Communication Attitude Test for Adults (BigCAT). The scores for each of these subtests were calculated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A repeated measures MANOVA did not find statistically significant differences between the subscores of PWPD and proxies (Pillai’s trace = 0.25, F[4] = 2.22, p =.094, η(p)(2) = 0.25). Fair to excellent agreement between the PWPD and proxies was found. The highest agreement was found on the BigCAT (ICC = 0.80). The SSC-SD (ICC = 0.77) and SSC-ER (ICC = 0.71) still showed excellent agreement, while only fair agreement was found for the BCL (ICC = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Proxies were able to identify the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in PWPD. Communication partners close to the PWPD could, therefore, provide valuable information regarding the assessment and treatment of hypophonia in PD. Elsevier 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9289734/ /pubmed/35860426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100152 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Thijs, Zoë
Zhang, Yan
Van Lierde, Kristiane
Vanryckeghem, Martine
Watts, Christopher R.
Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease
title Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease
title_full Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease
title_short Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease
title_sort partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with parkinson’s disease
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100152
work_keys_str_mv AT thijszoe partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT zhangyan partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT vanlierdekristiane partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT vanryckeghemmartine partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease
AT wattschristopherr partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease