Cargando…
Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease
INTRODUCTION: People with Parkinson’s disease (PWPD) experience negative feelings, thoughts, and coping behaviors due to the experienced communication challenges. This study aimed to compare the perceptions of PWPD with those of proxies for the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions specific...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100152 |
_version_ | 1784748732257927168 |
---|---|
author | Thijs, Zoë Zhang, Yan Van Lierde, Kristiane Vanryckeghem, Martine Watts, Christopher R. |
author_facet | Thijs, Zoë Zhang, Yan Van Lierde, Kristiane Vanryckeghem, Martine Watts, Christopher R. |
author_sort | Thijs, Zoë |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: People with Parkinson’s disease (PWPD) experience negative feelings, thoughts, and coping behaviors due to the experienced communication challenges. This study aimed to compare the perceptions of PWPD with those of proxies for the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions specific to voice production during communicative interactions. METHODS: The Behavior Assessment Battery – Voice (BAB-Voice) was administered to 31 PWPD and their close communication partner/proxy. The BAB-Voice contained four subtests: Speech Situation Checklist – Emotional Reaction (SSC-ER), Speech Situation Checklist – Speech Disruption (SSC-SD), Behavior Checklist (BCL), and Communication Attitude Test for Adults (BigCAT). The scores for each of these subtests were calculated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A repeated measures MANOVA did not find statistically significant differences between the subscores of PWPD and proxies (Pillai’s trace = 0.25, F[4] = 2.22, p =.094, η(p)(2) = 0.25). Fair to excellent agreement between the PWPD and proxies was found. The highest agreement was found on the BigCAT (ICC = 0.80). The SSC-SD (ICC = 0.77) and SSC-ER (ICC = 0.71) still showed excellent agreement, while only fair agreement was found for the BCL (ICC = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Proxies were able to identify the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in PWPD. Communication partners close to the PWPD could, therefore, provide valuable information regarding the assessment and treatment of hypophonia in PD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9289734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92897342022-07-19 Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease Thijs, Zoë Zhang, Yan Van Lierde, Kristiane Vanryckeghem, Martine Watts, Christopher R. Clin Park Relat Disord Original Articles INTRODUCTION: People with Parkinson’s disease (PWPD) experience negative feelings, thoughts, and coping behaviors due to the experienced communication challenges. This study aimed to compare the perceptions of PWPD with those of proxies for the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions specific to voice production during communicative interactions. METHODS: The Behavior Assessment Battery – Voice (BAB-Voice) was administered to 31 PWPD and their close communication partner/proxy. The BAB-Voice contained four subtests: Speech Situation Checklist – Emotional Reaction (SSC-ER), Speech Situation Checklist – Speech Disruption (SSC-SD), Behavior Checklist (BCL), and Communication Attitude Test for Adults (BigCAT). The scores for each of these subtests were calculated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A repeated measures MANOVA did not find statistically significant differences between the subscores of PWPD and proxies (Pillai’s trace = 0.25, F[4] = 2.22, p =.094, η(p)(2) = 0.25). Fair to excellent agreement between the PWPD and proxies was found. The highest agreement was found on the BigCAT (ICC = 0.80). The SSC-SD (ICC = 0.77) and SSC-ER (ICC = 0.71) still showed excellent agreement, while only fair agreement was found for the BCL (ICC = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Proxies were able to identify the affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in PWPD. Communication partners close to the PWPD could, therefore, provide valuable information regarding the assessment and treatment of hypophonia in PD. Elsevier 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9289734/ /pubmed/35860426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100152 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Thijs, Zoë Zhang, Yan Van Lierde, Kristiane Vanryckeghem, Martine Watts, Christopher R. Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease |
title | Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease |
title_full | Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease |
title_fullStr | Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease |
title_short | Partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with Parkinson’s disease |
title_sort | partner perception of affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to voice use in people with parkinson’s disease |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100152 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thijszoe partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease AT zhangyan partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease AT vanlierdekristiane partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease AT vanryckeghemmartine partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease AT wattschristopherr partnerperceptionofaffectivebehavioralandcognitivereactionstovoiceuseinpeoplewithparkinsonsdisease |