Cargando…

Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas

Background and study aims  Because the endoscopic treatment for non-ampullary duodenal adenoma (NADA) has a non-negligible risk of adverse events (AEs), a safe and easy treatment for NADA is desirable. This was a multicenter prospective trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polype...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanzaki, Hiromitsu, Horii, Joichiro, Takenaka, Ryuta, Nakagawa, Hiroyuki, Matsueda, Kazuhiro, Tsuzuki, Takao, Kita, Masahide, Yamasaki, Yasushi, Tanaka, Takehiro, Iwamuro, Masaya, Kawano, Seiji, Kawahara, Yoshiro, Tomoda, Jun, Okada, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1793-9439
_version_ 1784748785806606336
author Kanzaki, Hiromitsu
Horii, Joichiro
Takenaka, Ryuta
Nakagawa, Hiroyuki
Matsueda, Kazuhiro
Tsuzuki, Takao
Kita, Masahide
Yamasaki, Yasushi
Tanaka, Takehiro
Iwamuro, Masaya
Kawano, Seiji
Kawahara, Yoshiro
Tomoda, Jun
Okada, Hiroyuki
author_facet Kanzaki, Hiromitsu
Horii, Joichiro
Takenaka, Ryuta
Nakagawa, Hiroyuki
Matsueda, Kazuhiro
Tsuzuki, Takao
Kita, Masahide
Yamasaki, Yasushi
Tanaka, Takehiro
Iwamuro, Masaya
Kawano, Seiji
Kawahara, Yoshiro
Tomoda, Jun
Okada, Hiroyuki
author_sort Kanzaki, Hiromitsu
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Because the endoscopic treatment for non-ampullary duodenal adenoma (NADA) has a non-negligible risk of adverse events (AEs), a safe and easy treatment for NADA is desirable. This was a multicenter prospective trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for diminutive NADAs. Patients and methods  This study was prospectively conducted at six general hospitals and one university hospital. The inclusion criteria were histologic and endoscopic diagnosis of low-grade NADA measuring ≤ 6 mm. A second endoscopy was scheduled for 1 month after CFP. After confirmation of the success of CFP, 6-month and 12-month surveillance endoscopies were scheduled. The primary endpoint was the endoscopic and histologic disease disappearance rates at the 12-month endoscopy. Results  Thirty-nine lesions from 38 patients were prospectively included. Median tumor size at enrollment was 5 mm (range 3–6 mm). There were four cases of remnant lesions at the second endoscopy, and the lesion disappearance rate of single CFP was 89.7 % (35 /39; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 76.9 %–97.9 %). In three cases, complete removal of the lesion was achieved with a single re-CFP, but one case required four repeat CFPs. The lesion disappearance rate at 12-month endoscopy was 97.4 % (38 /39; 95 %CI, 86.8 %–99.5 %). During the follow-up period, no AEs related to CFP were observed. Conclusions  CFP for NADA ≤ 6 mm was safe and effective in this study. This common endoscopic method to remove lesions may be an option for treatment of diminutive NADAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9289977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92899772022-07-19 Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas Kanzaki, Hiromitsu Horii, Joichiro Takenaka, Ryuta Nakagawa, Hiroyuki Matsueda, Kazuhiro Tsuzuki, Takao Kita, Masahide Yamasaki, Yasushi Tanaka, Takehiro Iwamuro, Masaya Kawano, Seiji Kawahara, Yoshiro Tomoda, Jun Okada, Hiroyuki Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Because the endoscopic treatment for non-ampullary duodenal adenoma (NADA) has a non-negligible risk of adverse events (AEs), a safe and easy treatment for NADA is desirable. This was a multicenter prospective trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for diminutive NADAs. Patients and methods  This study was prospectively conducted at six general hospitals and one university hospital. The inclusion criteria were histologic and endoscopic diagnosis of low-grade NADA measuring ≤ 6 mm. A second endoscopy was scheduled for 1 month after CFP. After confirmation of the success of CFP, 6-month and 12-month surveillance endoscopies were scheduled. The primary endpoint was the endoscopic and histologic disease disappearance rates at the 12-month endoscopy. Results  Thirty-nine lesions from 38 patients were prospectively included. Median tumor size at enrollment was 5 mm (range 3–6 mm). There were four cases of remnant lesions at the second endoscopy, and the lesion disappearance rate of single CFP was 89.7 % (35 /39; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 76.9 %–97.9 %). In three cases, complete removal of the lesion was achieved with a single re-CFP, but one case required four repeat CFPs. The lesion disappearance rate at 12-month endoscopy was 97.4 % (38 /39; 95 %CI, 86.8 %–99.5 %). During the follow-up period, no AEs related to CFP were observed. Conclusions  CFP for NADA ≤ 6 mm was safe and effective in this study. This common endoscopic method to remove lesions may be an option for treatment of diminutive NADAs. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9289977/ /pubmed/35859656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1793-9439 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Kanzaki, Hiromitsu
Horii, Joichiro
Takenaka, Ryuta
Nakagawa, Hiroyuki
Matsueda, Kazuhiro
Tsuzuki, Takao
Kita, Masahide
Yamasaki, Yasushi
Tanaka, Takehiro
Iwamuro, Masaya
Kawano, Seiji
Kawahara, Yoshiro
Tomoda, Jun
Okada, Hiroyuki
Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas
title Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas
title_full Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas
title_fullStr Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas
title_full_unstemmed Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas
title_short Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas
title_sort prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1793-9439
work_keys_str_mv AT kanzakihiromitsu prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT horiijoichiro prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT takenakaryuta prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT nakagawahiroyuki prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT matsuedakazuhiro prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT tsuzukitakao prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT kitamasahide prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT yamasakiyasushi prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT tanakatakehiro prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT iwamuromasaya prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT kawanoseiji prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT kawaharayoshiro prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT tomodajun prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas
AT okadahiroyuki prospectivemulticenterstudyoftheefficacyandsafetyofcoldforcepspolypectomyfor6mmnonampullaryduodenallowgradeadenomas