Cargando…

Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation

BACKGROUND: Ethical decision-making confidence develops from clinical expertise and is a core competency for nurse leaders. No tool exists to measure confidence levels in nurse leaders based upon an ethical decision-making framework. AIMS: The objective of this research was to compare ethical decisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birkholz, Lorri, Kutschar, Patrick, Kundt, Firuzan Sari, Beil-Hildebrand, Margitta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35230887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330211065847
_version_ 1784748789497593856
author Birkholz, Lorri
Kutschar, Patrick
Kundt, Firuzan Sari
Beil-Hildebrand, Margitta
author_facet Birkholz, Lorri
Kutschar, Patrick
Kundt, Firuzan Sari
Beil-Hildebrand, Margitta
author_sort Birkholz, Lorri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ethical decision-making confidence develops from clinical expertise and is a core competency for nurse leaders. No tool exists to measure confidence levels in nurse leaders based upon an ethical decision-making framework. AIMS: The objective of this research was to compare ethical decision-making among nurse leaders in the U.S. and three German-speaking countries in Europe by developing and testing a newly constructed Ethical Decision-Making Confidence (EDMC) scale. METHODS: The cross-sectional survey included 18 theory-derived questions on ethical decision-making confidence which were used to develop the scale. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of nurse leaders from the U.S. and three German-speaking countries in Europe who self-identified as holding a leadership position. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Ethical approval was given by the IRB Board of a U.S. university. Participation in the survey implied voluntary consent. RESULTS: The scale’s item structure dimensionality and subscale’s reliability were analyzed and compared between nurse leaders from all four countries. A principal component analysis (PCA) produced a 15-item bi-dimensional EDMC scale yielding a skill-related (9-item) and a behavior-related (6-item) confidence dimension. EDMC subscales showed good-to-excellent internal consistency. In both subscales, U.S. nurse leaders rated their mean EDMC score higher than their German-speaking counterparts in Europe. DISCUSSION: This exploratory study is the first of its kind to focus on nurse leaders’ confidence regarding ethical decision-making in an international context. An overarching factor structure was identified, which is shared by the two samples of nurse leaders and to examine (sub)scales’ psychometric properties. CONCLUSION: This newly developed scale is an effective tool for measuring ethical decision-making confidence in nurse leaders. The promising results of this study should be replicated to ensure validity and reliability of the EDMC scale measuring skill-related and behavior-related concepts and include nurse leaders from various cultural, social, and demographic groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9289993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92899932022-07-19 Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation Birkholz, Lorri Kutschar, Patrick Kundt, Firuzan Sari Beil-Hildebrand, Margitta Nurs Ethics Original Manuscripts BACKGROUND: Ethical decision-making confidence develops from clinical expertise and is a core competency for nurse leaders. No tool exists to measure confidence levels in nurse leaders based upon an ethical decision-making framework. AIMS: The objective of this research was to compare ethical decision-making among nurse leaders in the U.S. and three German-speaking countries in Europe by developing and testing a newly constructed Ethical Decision-Making Confidence (EDMC) scale. METHODS: The cross-sectional survey included 18 theory-derived questions on ethical decision-making confidence which were used to develop the scale. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of nurse leaders from the U.S. and three German-speaking countries in Europe who self-identified as holding a leadership position. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Ethical approval was given by the IRB Board of a U.S. university. Participation in the survey implied voluntary consent. RESULTS: The scale’s item structure dimensionality and subscale’s reliability were analyzed and compared between nurse leaders from all four countries. A principal component analysis (PCA) produced a 15-item bi-dimensional EDMC scale yielding a skill-related (9-item) and a behavior-related (6-item) confidence dimension. EDMC subscales showed good-to-excellent internal consistency. In both subscales, U.S. nurse leaders rated their mean EDMC score higher than their German-speaking counterparts in Europe. DISCUSSION: This exploratory study is the first of its kind to focus on nurse leaders’ confidence regarding ethical decision-making in an international context. An overarching factor structure was identified, which is shared by the two samples of nurse leaders and to examine (sub)scales’ psychometric properties. CONCLUSION: This newly developed scale is an effective tool for measuring ethical decision-making confidence in nurse leaders. The promising results of this study should be replicated to ensure validity and reliability of the EDMC scale measuring skill-related and behavior-related concepts and include nurse leaders from various cultural, social, and demographic groups. SAGE Publications 2022-03-01 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9289993/ /pubmed/35230887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330211065847 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscripts
Birkholz, Lorri
Kutschar, Patrick
Kundt, Firuzan Sari
Beil-Hildebrand, Margitta
Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation
title Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation
title_full Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation
title_fullStr Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation
title_short Ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: Psychometric evaluation
title_sort ethical decision-making confidence scale for nurse leaders: psychometric evaluation
topic Original Manuscripts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35230887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330211065847
work_keys_str_mv AT birkholzlorri ethicaldecisionmakingconfidencescalefornurseleaderspsychometricevaluation
AT kutscharpatrick ethicaldecisionmakingconfidencescalefornurseleaderspsychometricevaluation
AT kundtfiruzansari ethicaldecisionmakingconfidencescalefornurseleaderspsychometricevaluation
AT beilhildebrandmargitta ethicaldecisionmakingconfidencescalefornurseleaderspsychometricevaluation