Cargando…

Towards an effective framework for integrating patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, electronic modalities are increasingly deployed to integrate patient-reported outcomes into electronic health records. Most popularly, patient portals are used for remote questionnaires, and tablets are provided to patients in-office in case they need help. They are b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Panzhang, Li, Tao, Yu, Lei, Zhou, Liang, Yan, Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221112152
_version_ 1784748824064950272
author Wang, Panzhang
Li, Tao
Yu, Lei
Zhou, Liang
Yan, Tao
author_facet Wang, Panzhang
Li, Tao
Yu, Lei
Zhou, Liang
Yan, Tao
author_sort Wang, Panzhang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the past decade, electronic modalities are increasingly deployed to integrate patient-reported outcomes into electronic health records. Most popularly, patient portals are used for remote questionnaires, and tablets are provided to patients in-office in case they need help. They are both useful. But some barriers are still in the way, which place burdens on patients and clinicians in the process of routine data collection. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe a portable and scalable framework which can simplify the patient-reported outcome integration by mitigating the related burdens. METHODS: A framework was proposed to use a modular approach to replace the tethered approach. The framework was open-sourced on GitHub. After development and testing, it was evaluated on an instrument with 24 questions in a real clinical setting. Patients were randomly selected in every modality-based group. For objective analysis, completion time and response rate were collected. No-show data was collected and analyzed. For subjective analysis, the NASA Task Load Index was used to measure workload, and the Net Promoter Score was used to assess user satisfaction. RESULTS: The model could contain 46,656 questions. A quick response code could store 1120 encoded items. For remote visits, the response rate was improved compared to the portal group (76.6% vs. 61.1%). The completion time was reduced by 37.5% when compared to the tablet group and was reduced by 43.4% when compared to the portal group. The workload for clinicians and patients was both reduced significantly (p < 0.001). A higher Net Promoter Score was rated by both clinicians (89.3%) and patients (86.5%). Compared to the portal group, the no-show rate was reduced (11.7% vs. 8.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Collecting patient-reported outcomes over a quick response code appears to be an alternative modality to enable a simplified integration. This study provides new insights to collect patient-reported outcomes with interoperability and substitutability in mind.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92901502022-07-19 Towards an effective framework for integrating patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records Wang, Panzhang Li, Tao Yu, Lei Zhou, Liang Yan, Tao Digit Health Special Collection on Covid-19 BACKGROUND: In the past decade, electronic modalities are increasingly deployed to integrate patient-reported outcomes into electronic health records. Most popularly, patient portals are used for remote questionnaires, and tablets are provided to patients in-office in case they need help. They are both useful. But some barriers are still in the way, which place burdens on patients and clinicians in the process of routine data collection. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe a portable and scalable framework which can simplify the patient-reported outcome integration by mitigating the related burdens. METHODS: A framework was proposed to use a modular approach to replace the tethered approach. The framework was open-sourced on GitHub. After development and testing, it was evaluated on an instrument with 24 questions in a real clinical setting. Patients were randomly selected in every modality-based group. For objective analysis, completion time and response rate were collected. No-show data was collected and analyzed. For subjective analysis, the NASA Task Load Index was used to measure workload, and the Net Promoter Score was used to assess user satisfaction. RESULTS: The model could contain 46,656 questions. A quick response code could store 1120 encoded items. For remote visits, the response rate was improved compared to the portal group (76.6% vs. 61.1%). The completion time was reduced by 37.5% when compared to the tablet group and was reduced by 43.4% when compared to the portal group. The workload for clinicians and patients was both reduced significantly (p < 0.001). A higher Net Promoter Score was rated by both clinicians (89.3%) and patients (86.5%). Compared to the portal group, the no-show rate was reduced (11.7% vs. 8.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Collecting patient-reported outcomes over a quick response code appears to be an alternative modality to enable a simplified integration. This study provides new insights to collect patient-reported outcomes with interoperability and substitutability in mind. SAGE Publications 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9290150/ /pubmed/35860613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221112152 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Collection on Covid-19
Wang, Panzhang
Li, Tao
Yu, Lei
Zhou, Liang
Yan, Tao
Towards an effective framework for integrating patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records
title Towards an effective framework for integrating patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records
title_full Towards an effective framework for integrating patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records
title_fullStr Towards an effective framework for integrating patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records
title_full_unstemmed Towards an effective framework for integrating patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records
title_short Towards an effective framework for integrating patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records
title_sort towards an effective framework for integrating patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records
topic Special Collection on Covid-19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221112152
work_keys_str_mv AT wangpanzhang towardsaneffectiveframeworkforintegratingpatientreportedoutcomesinelectronichealthrecords
AT litao towardsaneffectiveframeworkforintegratingpatientreportedoutcomesinelectronichealthrecords
AT yulei towardsaneffectiveframeworkforintegratingpatientreportedoutcomesinelectronichealthrecords
AT zhouliang towardsaneffectiveframeworkforintegratingpatientreportedoutcomesinelectronichealthrecords
AT yantao towardsaneffectiveframeworkforintegratingpatientreportedoutcomesinelectronichealthrecords