Cargando…

Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is present in the early stage of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is associated with an increased risk of further cognitive decline and AD dementia later in life. Early detection of at-risk groups with subjective complaints is critical for targe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibnidris, Aliaa, Robinson, Janelle N., Stubbs, Marissa, Piumatti, Giovanni, Govia, Ishtar, Albanese, Emiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35850915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02018-y
_version_ 1784748856304467968
author Ibnidris, Aliaa
Robinson, Janelle N.
Stubbs, Marissa
Piumatti, Giovanni
Govia, Ishtar
Albanese, Emiliano
author_facet Ibnidris, Aliaa
Robinson, Janelle N.
Stubbs, Marissa
Piumatti, Giovanni
Govia, Ishtar
Albanese, Emiliano
author_sort Ibnidris, Aliaa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is present in the early stage of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is associated with an increased risk of further cognitive decline and AD dementia later in life. Early detection of at-risk groups with subjective complaints is critical for targeted dementia prevention at the earliest. Accurate assessment of SCD is crucial. However, current measures lack important psychometric evaluations and or reporting. OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate measurement properties of self-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess SCD in the older adult population with or at risk of AD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 Checklist for reporting. We conducted a literature search, screened, and included validation studies of SCD based on self-reported questionnaires from both population-based and clinical studies, conducted in older adults (≥ 55). We critically appraised the included primary studies using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported psychometric properties of 17 SCD self-reported questionnaires. We extracted data on the structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and cross-cultural validity and found a widespread proneness to bias across studies, and a marked heterogeneity is assessed and reported measurement properties that prevented the consolidation of results. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that available SCD questionnaires lack content validity evaluation. Currently available measurements of SCD lack development and validation standards. Further work is needed to develop and validate SCD self-reported measurement with good quality measurement properties. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02018-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92902482022-07-19 Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review Ibnidris, Aliaa Robinson, Janelle N. Stubbs, Marissa Piumatti, Giovanni Govia, Ishtar Albanese, Emiliano Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is present in the early stage of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is associated with an increased risk of further cognitive decline and AD dementia later in life. Early detection of at-risk groups with subjective complaints is critical for targeted dementia prevention at the earliest. Accurate assessment of SCD is crucial. However, current measures lack important psychometric evaluations and or reporting. OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate measurement properties of self-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess SCD in the older adult population with or at risk of AD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 Checklist for reporting. We conducted a literature search, screened, and included validation studies of SCD based on self-reported questionnaires from both population-based and clinical studies, conducted in older adults (≥ 55). We critically appraised the included primary studies using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported psychometric properties of 17 SCD self-reported questionnaires. We extracted data on the structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and cross-cultural validity and found a widespread proneness to bias across studies, and a marked heterogeneity is assessed and reported measurement properties that prevented the consolidation of results. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that available SCD questionnaires lack content validity evaluation. Currently available measurements of SCD lack development and validation standards. Further work is needed to develop and validate SCD self-reported measurement with good quality measurement properties. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02018-y. BioMed Central 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9290248/ /pubmed/35850915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02018-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ibnidris, Aliaa
Robinson, Janelle N.
Stubbs, Marissa
Piumatti, Giovanni
Govia, Ishtar
Albanese, Emiliano
Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
title Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
title_full Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
title_fullStr Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
title_short Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
title_sort evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35850915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02018-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ibnidrisaliaa evaluatingmeasurementpropertiesofsubjectivecognitivedeclineselfreportedoutcomemeasuresasystematicreview
AT robinsonjanellen evaluatingmeasurementpropertiesofsubjectivecognitivedeclineselfreportedoutcomemeasuresasystematicreview
AT stubbsmarissa evaluatingmeasurementpropertiesofsubjectivecognitivedeclineselfreportedoutcomemeasuresasystematicreview
AT piumattigiovanni evaluatingmeasurementpropertiesofsubjectivecognitivedeclineselfreportedoutcomemeasuresasystematicreview
AT goviaishtar evaluatingmeasurementpropertiesofsubjectivecognitivedeclineselfreportedoutcomemeasuresasystematicreview
AT albaneseemiliano evaluatingmeasurementpropertiesofsubjectivecognitivedeclineselfreportedoutcomemeasuresasystematicreview