Cargando…

Inhaled corticosteroids, COPD, and the incidence of lung cancer: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: There has been debate on whether inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce the incidence of lung cancer amongst patients with Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD). We aimed to perform a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis on available observational data. METHODS: We performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitre, Tyler, Kiflen, Michel, Ho, Terence, Seijo, Luis M., Zeraatkar, Dena, de Torres, Juan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35843928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02072-1
_version_ 1784748864961511424
author Pitre, Tyler
Kiflen, Michel
Ho, Terence
Seijo, Luis M.
Zeraatkar, Dena
de Torres, Juan P.
author_facet Pitre, Tyler
Kiflen, Michel
Ho, Terence
Seijo, Luis M.
Zeraatkar, Dena
de Torres, Juan P.
author_sort Pitre, Tyler
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been debate on whether inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce the incidence of lung cancer amongst patients with Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD). We aimed to perform a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis on available observational data. METHODS: We performed both a dose response and high versus low random effects meta-analysis on observational studies measuring whether lung cancer incidence was lower in patients using ICS with COPD. We report relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), as well as risk difference. We use the GRADE framework to report our results. RESULTS: Our dose–response suggested a reduction in the incidence of lung cancer for every 500 ug/day of fluticasone equivalent ICS (RR 0.82 [95% 0.68–0.95]). Using a baseline risk of 7.2%, we calculated risk difference of 14 fewer cases per 1000 ([95% CI 24.7–3.8 fewer]). Similarly, our results suggested that for every 1000 ug/day of fluticasone equivalent ICS, there was a larger reduction in incidence of lung cancer (RR 0.68 [0.44–0.93]), with a risk difference of 24.7 fewer cases per 1000 ([95% CI 43.2–5.4 fewer]). The certainty of the evidence was low to very low, due to risk of bias and inconsistency. CONCLUSION: There may be a reduction in the incidence for lung cancer in COPD patients who use ICS. However, the quality of the evidence is low to very low, therefore, we are limited in making strong claims about the true effect of ICS on lung cancer incidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02072-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92902832022-07-19 Inhaled corticosteroids, COPD, and the incidence of lung cancer: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis Pitre, Tyler Kiflen, Michel Ho, Terence Seijo, Luis M. Zeraatkar, Dena de Torres, Juan P. BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: There has been debate on whether inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce the incidence of lung cancer amongst patients with Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD). We aimed to perform a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis on available observational data. METHODS: We performed both a dose response and high versus low random effects meta-analysis on observational studies measuring whether lung cancer incidence was lower in patients using ICS with COPD. We report relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), as well as risk difference. We use the GRADE framework to report our results. RESULTS: Our dose–response suggested a reduction in the incidence of lung cancer for every 500 ug/day of fluticasone equivalent ICS (RR 0.82 [95% 0.68–0.95]). Using a baseline risk of 7.2%, we calculated risk difference of 14 fewer cases per 1000 ([95% CI 24.7–3.8 fewer]). Similarly, our results suggested that for every 1000 ug/day of fluticasone equivalent ICS, there was a larger reduction in incidence of lung cancer (RR 0.68 [0.44–0.93]), with a risk difference of 24.7 fewer cases per 1000 ([95% CI 43.2–5.4 fewer]). The certainty of the evidence was low to very low, due to risk of bias and inconsistency. CONCLUSION: There may be a reduction in the incidence for lung cancer in COPD patients who use ICS. However, the quality of the evidence is low to very low, therefore, we are limited in making strong claims about the true effect of ICS on lung cancer incidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02072-1. BioMed Central 2022-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9290283/ /pubmed/35843928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02072-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pitre, Tyler
Kiflen, Michel
Ho, Terence
Seijo, Luis M.
Zeraatkar, Dena
de Torres, Juan P.
Inhaled corticosteroids, COPD, and the incidence of lung cancer: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis
title Inhaled corticosteroids, COPD, and the incidence of lung cancer: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis
title_full Inhaled corticosteroids, COPD, and the incidence of lung cancer: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis
title_fullStr Inhaled corticosteroids, COPD, and the incidence of lung cancer: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Inhaled corticosteroids, COPD, and the incidence of lung cancer: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis
title_short Inhaled corticosteroids, COPD, and the incidence of lung cancer: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis
title_sort inhaled corticosteroids, copd, and the incidence of lung cancer: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35843928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02072-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pitretyler inhaledcorticosteroidscopdandtheincidenceoflungcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT kiflenmichel inhaledcorticosteroidscopdandtheincidenceoflungcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT hoterence inhaledcorticosteroidscopdandtheincidenceoflungcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT seijoluism inhaledcorticosteroidscopdandtheincidenceoflungcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT zeraatkardena inhaledcorticosteroidscopdandtheincidenceoflungcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis
AT detorresjuanp inhaledcorticosteroidscopdandtheincidenceoflungcancerasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysis