Cargando…

Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection

Human vision relies on mechanisms that respond to luminance edges in space and time. Most edge models use orientation-selective mechanisms on multiple spatial scales and operate on static inputs assuming that edge processing occurs within a single fixational instance. Recent studies, however, demons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmittwilken, Lynn, Maertens, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35834376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.8.5
_version_ 1784748870724485120
author Schmittwilken, Lynn
Maertens, Marianne
author_facet Schmittwilken, Lynn
Maertens, Marianne
author_sort Schmittwilken, Lynn
collection PubMed
description Human vision relies on mechanisms that respond to luminance edges in space and time. Most edge models use orientation-selective mechanisms on multiple spatial scales and operate on static inputs assuming that edge processing occurs within a single fixational instance. Recent studies, however, demonstrate functionally relevant temporal modulations of the sensory input due to fixational eye movements. Here we propose a spatiotemporal model of human edge detection that combines elements of spatial and active vision. The model augments a spatial vision model by temporal filtering and shifts the input images over time, mimicking an active sampling scheme via fixational eye movements. The first model test was White's illusion, a lightness effect that has been shown to depend on edges. The model reproduced the spatial-frequency-specific interference with the edges by superimposing narrowband noise (1–5 cpd), similar to the psychophysical interference observed in White's effect. Second, we compare the model's edge detection performance in natural images in the presence and absence of Gaussian white noise with human-labeled contours for the same (noise-free) images. Notably, the model detects edges robustly against noise in both test cases without relying on orientation-selective processes. Eliminating model components, we demonstrate the relevance of multiscale spatiotemporal filtering and scale-specific normalization for edge detection. The proposed model facilitates efficient edge detection in (artificial) vision systems and challenges the notion that orientation-selective mechanisms are required for edge detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92903152022-07-19 Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection Schmittwilken, Lynn Maertens, Marianne J Vis Article Human vision relies on mechanisms that respond to luminance edges in space and time. Most edge models use orientation-selective mechanisms on multiple spatial scales and operate on static inputs assuming that edge processing occurs within a single fixational instance. Recent studies, however, demonstrate functionally relevant temporal modulations of the sensory input due to fixational eye movements. Here we propose a spatiotemporal model of human edge detection that combines elements of spatial and active vision. The model augments a spatial vision model by temporal filtering and shifts the input images over time, mimicking an active sampling scheme via fixational eye movements. The first model test was White's illusion, a lightness effect that has been shown to depend on edges. The model reproduced the spatial-frequency-specific interference with the edges by superimposing narrowband noise (1–5 cpd), similar to the psychophysical interference observed in White's effect. Second, we compare the model's edge detection performance in natural images in the presence and absence of Gaussian white noise with human-labeled contours for the same (noise-free) images. Notably, the model detects edges robustly against noise in both test cases without relying on orientation-selective processes. Eliminating model components, we demonstrate the relevance of multiscale spatiotemporal filtering and scale-specific normalization for edge detection. The proposed model facilitates efficient edge detection in (artificial) vision systems and challenges the notion that orientation-selective mechanisms are required for edge detection. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9290315/ /pubmed/35834376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.8.5 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Schmittwilken, Lynn
Maertens, Marianne
Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection
title Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection
title_full Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection
title_fullStr Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection
title_full_unstemmed Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection
title_short Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection
title_sort fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35834376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.8.5
work_keys_str_mv AT schmittwilkenlynn fixationaleyemovementsenablerobustedgedetection
AT maertensmarianne fixationaleyemovementsenablerobustedgedetection