Cargando…
Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although English Stop Smoking Services routinely offer dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to help pregnant women to quit smoking, little is known about how nicotine and tobacco smoke exposures following this compare with that from smoking. We compared, in pregnant women whe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15671 |
_version_ | 1784748919510532096 |
---|---|
author | Slaich, Bhavandeep Claire, Ravinder Emery, Joanne Lewis, Sarah Cooper, Sue Thomson, Ross Phillips, Lucy Kinahan‐Goodwin, Darren Naughton, Felix McDaid, Lisa Clark, Miranda Dickinson, Anne Coleman, Tim |
author_facet | Slaich, Bhavandeep Claire, Ravinder Emery, Joanne Lewis, Sarah Cooper, Sue Thomson, Ross Phillips, Lucy Kinahan‐Goodwin, Darren Naughton, Felix McDaid, Lisa Clark, Miranda Dickinson, Anne Coleman, Tim |
author_sort | Slaich, Bhavandeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although English Stop Smoking Services routinely offer dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to help pregnant women to quit smoking, little is known about how nicotine and tobacco smoke exposures following this compare with that from smoking. We compared, in pregnant women when smoking and after being offered dual NRT, saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations and numbers of daily cigarettes smoked. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of data from three sequential, observational, mixed‐methods cohort studies conducted as part of the Nicotine Replacement Effectiveness and Delivery in Pregnancy programme. Participants were recruited on‐line or in Nottingham University Hospitals (UK) antenatal clinics between June 2019 and September 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Forty pregnant women, who agreed to try stopping smoking. INTERVENTION: Participants were offered dual NRT, agreed a smoking quit date and received an intervention to improve adherence to NRT. MEASUREMENTS: Saliva cotinine and exhaled CO concentrations and reported number of cigarettes smoked per day. FINDINGS: There were no differences in saliva cotinine concentrations at baseline and day 7 post quit date [n = 20, mean difference = −32.31 ng/ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −68.11 to 3.5 ng/ml; P = 0.074, Bayes factor = 0.04]. There were reductions in the reported number of cigarettes smoked per day (n = 26, mean difference = −7 cigarettes, 95% CI = −8.35 to −5.42 cigarettes, P < 0.001) and concurrently in exhaled CO concentrations (n = 17, ratio of geometric means = 0.30 p.p.m., 95% CI = 0.17–0.52 p.p.m.; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women who smoke and are offered dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) appear to show no change in their exposure to cotinine compared with their pre‐NRT exposure levels but they report smoking fewer cigarettes, as validated by reductions in exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9290515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92905152022-07-20 Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy Slaich, Bhavandeep Claire, Ravinder Emery, Joanne Lewis, Sarah Cooper, Sue Thomson, Ross Phillips, Lucy Kinahan‐Goodwin, Darren Naughton, Felix McDaid, Lisa Clark, Miranda Dickinson, Anne Coleman, Tim Addiction Research Reports BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although English Stop Smoking Services routinely offer dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to help pregnant women to quit smoking, little is known about how nicotine and tobacco smoke exposures following this compare with that from smoking. We compared, in pregnant women when smoking and after being offered dual NRT, saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations and numbers of daily cigarettes smoked. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of data from three sequential, observational, mixed‐methods cohort studies conducted as part of the Nicotine Replacement Effectiveness and Delivery in Pregnancy programme. Participants were recruited on‐line or in Nottingham University Hospitals (UK) antenatal clinics between June 2019 and September 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Forty pregnant women, who agreed to try stopping smoking. INTERVENTION: Participants were offered dual NRT, agreed a smoking quit date and received an intervention to improve adherence to NRT. MEASUREMENTS: Saliva cotinine and exhaled CO concentrations and reported number of cigarettes smoked per day. FINDINGS: There were no differences in saliva cotinine concentrations at baseline and day 7 post quit date [n = 20, mean difference = −32.31 ng/ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −68.11 to 3.5 ng/ml; P = 0.074, Bayes factor = 0.04]. There were reductions in the reported number of cigarettes smoked per day (n = 26, mean difference = −7 cigarettes, 95% CI = −8.35 to −5.42 cigarettes, P < 0.001) and concurrently in exhaled CO concentrations (n = 17, ratio of geometric means = 0.30 p.p.m., 95% CI = 0.17–0.52 p.p.m.; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women who smoke and are offered dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) appear to show no change in their exposure to cotinine compared with their pre‐NRT exposure levels but they report smoking fewer cigarettes, as validated by reductions in exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-20 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9290515/ /pubmed/34427009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15671 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Slaich, Bhavandeep Claire, Ravinder Emery, Joanne Lewis, Sarah Cooper, Sue Thomson, Ross Phillips, Lucy Kinahan‐Goodwin, Darren Naughton, Felix McDaid, Lisa Clark, Miranda Dickinson, Anne Coleman, Tim Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy |
title | Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy |
title_full | Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy |
title_short | Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy |
title_sort | comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slaichbhavandeep comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT claireravinder comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT emeryjoanne comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT lewissarah comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT coopersue comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT thomsonross comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT phillipslucy comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT kinahangoodwindarren comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT naughtonfelix comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT mcdaidlisa comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT clarkmiranda comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT dickinsonanne comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy AT colemantim comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy |