Cargando…

Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although English Stop Smoking Services routinely offer dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to help pregnant women to quit smoking, little is known about how nicotine and tobacco smoke exposures following this compare with that from smoking. We compared, in pregnant women whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slaich, Bhavandeep, Claire, Ravinder, Emery, Joanne, Lewis, Sarah, Cooper, Sue, Thomson, Ross, Phillips, Lucy, Kinahan‐Goodwin, Darren, Naughton, Felix, McDaid, Lisa, Clark, Miranda, Dickinson, Anne, Coleman, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15671
_version_ 1784748919510532096
author Slaich, Bhavandeep
Claire, Ravinder
Emery, Joanne
Lewis, Sarah
Cooper, Sue
Thomson, Ross
Phillips, Lucy
Kinahan‐Goodwin, Darren
Naughton, Felix
McDaid, Lisa
Clark, Miranda
Dickinson, Anne
Coleman, Tim
author_facet Slaich, Bhavandeep
Claire, Ravinder
Emery, Joanne
Lewis, Sarah
Cooper, Sue
Thomson, Ross
Phillips, Lucy
Kinahan‐Goodwin, Darren
Naughton, Felix
McDaid, Lisa
Clark, Miranda
Dickinson, Anne
Coleman, Tim
author_sort Slaich, Bhavandeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although English Stop Smoking Services routinely offer dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to help pregnant women to quit smoking, little is known about how nicotine and tobacco smoke exposures following this compare with that from smoking. We compared, in pregnant women when smoking and after being offered dual NRT, saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations and numbers of daily cigarettes smoked. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of data from three sequential, observational, mixed‐methods cohort studies conducted as part of the Nicotine Replacement Effectiveness and Delivery in Pregnancy programme. Participants were recruited on‐line or in Nottingham University Hospitals (UK) antenatal clinics between June 2019 and September 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Forty pregnant women, who agreed to try stopping smoking. INTERVENTION: Participants were offered dual NRT, agreed a smoking quit date and received an intervention to improve adherence to NRT. MEASUREMENTS: Saliva cotinine and exhaled CO concentrations and reported number of cigarettes smoked per day. FINDINGS: There were no differences in saliva cotinine concentrations at baseline and day 7 post quit date [n = 20, mean difference = −32.31 ng/ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −68.11 to 3.5 ng/ml; P = 0.074, Bayes factor = 0.04]. There were reductions in the reported number of cigarettes smoked per day (n = 26, mean difference = −7 cigarettes, 95% CI = −8.35 to −5.42 cigarettes, P < 0.001) and concurrently in exhaled CO concentrations (n = 17, ratio of geometric means = 0.30 p.p.m., 95% CI = 0.17–0.52 p.p.m.; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women who smoke and are offered dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) appear to show no change in their exposure to cotinine compared with their pre‐NRT exposure levels but they report smoking fewer cigarettes, as validated by reductions in exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92905152022-07-20 Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy Slaich, Bhavandeep Claire, Ravinder Emery, Joanne Lewis, Sarah Cooper, Sue Thomson, Ross Phillips, Lucy Kinahan‐Goodwin, Darren Naughton, Felix McDaid, Lisa Clark, Miranda Dickinson, Anne Coleman, Tim Addiction Research Reports BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although English Stop Smoking Services routinely offer dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to help pregnant women to quit smoking, little is known about how nicotine and tobacco smoke exposures following this compare with that from smoking. We compared, in pregnant women when smoking and after being offered dual NRT, saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations and numbers of daily cigarettes smoked. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary analysis of data from three sequential, observational, mixed‐methods cohort studies conducted as part of the Nicotine Replacement Effectiveness and Delivery in Pregnancy programme. Participants were recruited on‐line or in Nottingham University Hospitals (UK) antenatal clinics between June 2019 and September 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Forty pregnant women, who agreed to try stopping smoking. INTERVENTION: Participants were offered dual NRT, agreed a smoking quit date and received an intervention to improve adherence to NRT. MEASUREMENTS: Saliva cotinine and exhaled CO concentrations and reported number of cigarettes smoked per day. FINDINGS: There were no differences in saliva cotinine concentrations at baseline and day 7 post quit date [n = 20, mean difference = −32.31 ng/ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −68.11 to 3.5 ng/ml; P = 0.074, Bayes factor = 0.04]. There were reductions in the reported number of cigarettes smoked per day (n = 26, mean difference = −7 cigarettes, 95% CI = −8.35 to −5.42 cigarettes, P < 0.001) and concurrently in exhaled CO concentrations (n = 17, ratio of geometric means = 0.30 p.p.m., 95% CI = 0.17–0.52 p.p.m.; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women who smoke and are offered dual nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) appear to show no change in their exposure to cotinine compared with their pre‐NRT exposure levels but they report smoking fewer cigarettes, as validated by reductions in exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-20 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9290515/ /pubmed/34427009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15671 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Slaich, Bhavandeep
Claire, Ravinder
Emery, Joanne
Lewis, Sarah
Cooper, Sue
Thomson, Ross
Phillips, Lucy
Kinahan‐Goodwin, Darren
Naughton, Felix
McDaid, Lisa
Clark, Miranda
Dickinson, Anne
Coleman, Tim
Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
title Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
title_full Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
title_fullStr Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
title_short Comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
title_sort comparison of saliva cotinine and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations when smoking and after being offered dual nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15671
work_keys_str_mv AT slaichbhavandeep comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT claireravinder comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT emeryjoanne comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT lewissarah comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT coopersue comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT thomsonross comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT phillipslucy comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT kinahangoodwindarren comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT naughtonfelix comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT mcdaidlisa comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT clarkmiranda comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT dickinsonanne comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy
AT colemantim comparisonofsalivacotinineandexhaledcarbonmonoxideconcentrationswhensmokingandafterbeingoffereddualnicotinereplacementtherapyinpregnancy