Cargando…

A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay

The use of natural habitats for coastal protection (also known as Nature‐Based Solutions or NBS) in place of engineered structures like breakwaters and seawalls can yield a wide range of ecological and economic benefits. Despite these advantages, NBS are not commonly implemented for shoreline protec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Jenny, Whitfield, Paula, Szimanski, Danielle, Golden, Becky R., Whitbeck, Matt, Gailani, Joe, Herman, Brook, Tritinger, Amanda, Dillon, Sally C., King, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4437
_version_ 1784748926580031488
author Davis, Jenny
Whitfield, Paula
Szimanski, Danielle
Golden, Becky R.
Whitbeck, Matt
Gailani, Joe
Herman, Brook
Tritinger, Amanda
Dillon, Sally C.
King, Jeffrey
author_facet Davis, Jenny
Whitfield, Paula
Szimanski, Danielle
Golden, Becky R.
Whitbeck, Matt
Gailani, Joe
Herman, Brook
Tritinger, Amanda
Dillon, Sally C.
King, Jeffrey
author_sort Davis, Jenny
collection PubMed
description The use of natural habitats for coastal protection (also known as Nature‐Based Solutions or NBS) in place of engineered structures like breakwaters and seawalls can yield a wide range of ecological and economic benefits. Despite these advantages, NBS are not commonly implemented for shoreline protection due to uncertainty over the amount of protection afforded by each unique feature and how protective capacity and ecological benefits are likely to change over time as NBS mature and adapt to changing environmental drivers. Here, we highlight the recent restoration of Swan Island in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA, and the collaborative approach used to evaluate post‐construction performance, as a framework for quantitative evaluation of NBS projects. At Swan Island, 60 000 cubic yards of dredged sediment were used to elevate and restore the island's footprint with an emphasis on increasing its protective and ecological benefits and long‐term resilience to sea‐level rise. Five entities have leveraged resources to quantify the benefits and efficacy of island restoration by conducting pre‐ and post‐restoration monitoring, which supports the development of an integrated, simulation model that includes three “measured” system parameters: wave height, vegetative biomass, and island profile (i.e., elevations). The model will be used to predict island performance under a range of different system scenarios and used to inform adaptive management options. Results will demonstrate the efficacy of leveraging natural and engineered processes to restore island systems while providing a framework for quantifying NBS. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:42–48. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92905432022-07-20 A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay Davis, Jenny Whitfield, Paula Szimanski, Danielle Golden, Becky R. Whitbeck, Matt Gailani, Joe Herman, Brook Tritinger, Amanda Dillon, Sally C. King, Jeffrey Integr Environ Assess Manag Special Series: Incorporating Nature‐based Solutions to the Built Environment The use of natural habitats for coastal protection (also known as Nature‐Based Solutions or NBS) in place of engineered structures like breakwaters and seawalls can yield a wide range of ecological and economic benefits. Despite these advantages, NBS are not commonly implemented for shoreline protection due to uncertainty over the amount of protection afforded by each unique feature and how protective capacity and ecological benefits are likely to change over time as NBS mature and adapt to changing environmental drivers. Here, we highlight the recent restoration of Swan Island in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA, and the collaborative approach used to evaluate post‐construction performance, as a framework for quantitative evaluation of NBS projects. At Swan Island, 60 000 cubic yards of dredged sediment were used to elevate and restore the island's footprint with an emphasis on increasing its protective and ecological benefits and long‐term resilience to sea‐level rise. Five entities have leveraged resources to quantify the benefits and efficacy of island restoration by conducting pre‐ and post‐restoration monitoring, which supports the development of an integrated, simulation model that includes three “measured” system parameters: wave height, vegetative biomass, and island profile (i.e., elevations). The model will be used to predict island performance under a range of different system scenarios and used to inform adaptive management options. Results will demonstrate the efficacy of leveraging natural and engineered processes to restore island systems while providing a framework for quantifying NBS. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:42–48. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-25 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9290543/ /pubmed/33913621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4437 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Series: Incorporating Nature‐based Solutions to the Built Environment
Davis, Jenny
Whitfield, Paula
Szimanski, Danielle
Golden, Becky R.
Whitbeck, Matt
Gailani, Joe
Herman, Brook
Tritinger, Amanda
Dillon, Sally C.
King, Jeffrey
A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay
title A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay
title_full A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay
title_fullStr A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay
title_full_unstemmed A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay
title_short A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay
title_sort framework for evaluating island restoration performance: a case study from the chesapeake bay
topic Special Series: Incorporating Nature‐based Solutions to the Built Environment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4437
work_keys_str_mv AT davisjenny aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT whitfieldpaula aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT szimanskidanielle aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT goldenbeckyr aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT whitbeckmatt aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT gailanijoe aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT hermanbrook aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT tritingeramanda aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT dillonsallyc aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT kingjeffrey aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT davisjenny frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT whitfieldpaula frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT szimanskidanielle frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT goldenbeckyr frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT whitbeckmatt frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT gailanijoe frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT hermanbrook frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT tritingeramanda frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT dillonsallyc frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay
AT kingjeffrey frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay