Cargando…
A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay
The use of natural habitats for coastal protection (also known as Nature‐Based Solutions or NBS) in place of engineered structures like breakwaters and seawalls can yield a wide range of ecological and economic benefits. Despite these advantages, NBS are not commonly implemented for shoreline protec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4437 |
_version_ | 1784748926580031488 |
---|---|
author | Davis, Jenny Whitfield, Paula Szimanski, Danielle Golden, Becky R. Whitbeck, Matt Gailani, Joe Herman, Brook Tritinger, Amanda Dillon, Sally C. King, Jeffrey |
author_facet | Davis, Jenny Whitfield, Paula Szimanski, Danielle Golden, Becky R. Whitbeck, Matt Gailani, Joe Herman, Brook Tritinger, Amanda Dillon, Sally C. King, Jeffrey |
author_sort | Davis, Jenny |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of natural habitats for coastal protection (also known as Nature‐Based Solutions or NBS) in place of engineered structures like breakwaters and seawalls can yield a wide range of ecological and economic benefits. Despite these advantages, NBS are not commonly implemented for shoreline protection due to uncertainty over the amount of protection afforded by each unique feature and how protective capacity and ecological benefits are likely to change over time as NBS mature and adapt to changing environmental drivers. Here, we highlight the recent restoration of Swan Island in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA, and the collaborative approach used to evaluate post‐construction performance, as a framework for quantitative evaluation of NBS projects. At Swan Island, 60 000 cubic yards of dredged sediment were used to elevate and restore the island's footprint with an emphasis on increasing its protective and ecological benefits and long‐term resilience to sea‐level rise. Five entities have leveraged resources to quantify the benefits and efficacy of island restoration by conducting pre‐ and post‐restoration monitoring, which supports the development of an integrated, simulation model that includes three “measured” system parameters: wave height, vegetative biomass, and island profile (i.e., elevations). The model will be used to predict island performance under a range of different system scenarios and used to inform adaptive management options. Results will demonstrate the efficacy of leveraging natural and engineered processes to restore island systems while providing a framework for quantifying NBS. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:42–48. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9290543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92905432022-07-20 A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay Davis, Jenny Whitfield, Paula Szimanski, Danielle Golden, Becky R. Whitbeck, Matt Gailani, Joe Herman, Brook Tritinger, Amanda Dillon, Sally C. King, Jeffrey Integr Environ Assess Manag Special Series: Incorporating Nature‐based Solutions to the Built Environment The use of natural habitats for coastal protection (also known as Nature‐Based Solutions or NBS) in place of engineered structures like breakwaters and seawalls can yield a wide range of ecological and economic benefits. Despite these advantages, NBS are not commonly implemented for shoreline protection due to uncertainty over the amount of protection afforded by each unique feature and how protective capacity and ecological benefits are likely to change over time as NBS mature and adapt to changing environmental drivers. Here, we highlight the recent restoration of Swan Island in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA, and the collaborative approach used to evaluate post‐construction performance, as a framework for quantitative evaluation of NBS projects. At Swan Island, 60 000 cubic yards of dredged sediment were used to elevate and restore the island's footprint with an emphasis on increasing its protective and ecological benefits and long‐term resilience to sea‐level rise. Five entities have leveraged resources to quantify the benefits and efficacy of island restoration by conducting pre‐ and post‐restoration monitoring, which supports the development of an integrated, simulation model that includes three “measured” system parameters: wave height, vegetative biomass, and island profile (i.e., elevations). The model will be used to predict island performance under a range of different system scenarios and used to inform adaptive management options. Results will demonstrate the efficacy of leveraging natural and engineered processes to restore island systems while providing a framework for quantifying NBS. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:42–48. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-25 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9290543/ /pubmed/33913621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4437 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Series: Incorporating Nature‐based Solutions to the Built Environment Davis, Jenny Whitfield, Paula Szimanski, Danielle Golden, Becky R. Whitbeck, Matt Gailani, Joe Herman, Brook Tritinger, Amanda Dillon, Sally C. King, Jeffrey A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay |
title | A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_full | A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_fullStr | A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_full_unstemmed | A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_short | A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_sort | framework for evaluating island restoration performance: a case study from the chesapeake bay |
topic | Special Series: Incorporating Nature‐based Solutions to the Built Environment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davisjenny aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT whitfieldpaula aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT szimanskidanielle aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT goldenbeckyr aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT whitbeckmatt aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT gailanijoe aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT hermanbrook aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT tritingeramanda aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT dillonsallyc aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT kingjeffrey aframeworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT davisjenny frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT whitfieldpaula frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT szimanskidanielle frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT goldenbeckyr frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT whitbeckmatt frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT gailanijoe frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT hermanbrook frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT tritingeramanda frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT dillonsallyc frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay AT kingjeffrey frameworkforevaluatingislandrestorationperformanceacasestudyfromthechesapeakebay |