Cargando…
Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment?
The ban imposed by the European Union on the use of neonicotinoids as sugar beet seed treatments was based on the exposure of bees to residues of neonicotinoids in pollen and nectar of succeeding crops. To address this concern, residues of thiamethoxam (TMX) and clothianidin (CTD) were analyzed in s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34292667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4498 |
_version_ | 1784748936356954112 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Helen Vaughan, Sarah Mahlein, Anne‐Katrin Ladewig, Erwin Kenter, Christine |
author_facet | Thompson, Helen Vaughan, Sarah Mahlein, Anne‐Katrin Ladewig, Erwin Kenter, Christine |
author_sort | Thompson, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ban imposed by the European Union on the use of neonicotinoids as sugar beet seed treatments was based on the exposure of bees to residues of neonicotinoids in pollen and nectar of succeeding crops. To address this concern, residues of thiamethoxam (TMX) and clothianidin (CTD) were analyzed in soil collected from fields planted in at least the previous year with thiamethoxam‐treated sugar beet seed. This soil monitoring program was conducted at 94 sites across Germany in two separate years. In addition, a succeeding crop study assessed residues in soil, guttation fluid, pollen, and nectar sampled from untreated succeeding crops planted in the season after thiamethoxam seed‐treated sugar beet at eight field sites across five countries. The overall mean residues observed in soil monitoring were 8.0 ± 0.5 µg TMX + CTD/kg in the season after the use of treated sugar beet seed. Residue values decreased with increasing time interval between the latest thiamethoxam or clothianidin application before sugar beet drilling and with lower application frequency. Residues were detected in guttation fluid (2.0–37.7 µg TMX/L); however, the risk to pollinators from this route of exposure is likely to be low, based on the reported levels of consumption. Residues of thiamethoxam and clothianidin in pollen and nectar sampled from the succeeding crops were detected at or below the limit of quantification (0.5–1 µg a.i./kg) in 86.7% of pollen and 98.6% of nectar samples and, unlike guttation fluid residues, were not correlated with measured soil residues. Residues in pollen and nectar are lower than reported sublethal adverse effect concentrations in studies with honeybee and bumble bee individuals and colonies fed only thiamethoxam‐treated sucrose, and are lower than those reported to result in no effects in honeybees, bumble bees, and solitary bees foraging on seed‐treated crops. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:709–721. © 2021 SYNGENTA. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9290588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92905882022-07-20 Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment? Thompson, Helen Vaughan, Sarah Mahlein, Anne‐Katrin Ladewig, Erwin Kenter, Christine Integr Environ Assess Manag Health & Ecological Risk Assessment The ban imposed by the European Union on the use of neonicotinoids as sugar beet seed treatments was based on the exposure of bees to residues of neonicotinoids in pollen and nectar of succeeding crops. To address this concern, residues of thiamethoxam (TMX) and clothianidin (CTD) were analyzed in soil collected from fields planted in at least the previous year with thiamethoxam‐treated sugar beet seed. This soil monitoring program was conducted at 94 sites across Germany in two separate years. In addition, a succeeding crop study assessed residues in soil, guttation fluid, pollen, and nectar sampled from untreated succeeding crops planted in the season after thiamethoxam seed‐treated sugar beet at eight field sites across five countries. The overall mean residues observed in soil monitoring were 8.0 ± 0.5 µg TMX + CTD/kg in the season after the use of treated sugar beet seed. Residue values decreased with increasing time interval between the latest thiamethoxam or clothianidin application before sugar beet drilling and with lower application frequency. Residues were detected in guttation fluid (2.0–37.7 µg TMX/L); however, the risk to pollinators from this route of exposure is likely to be low, based on the reported levels of consumption. Residues of thiamethoxam and clothianidin in pollen and nectar sampled from the succeeding crops were detected at or below the limit of quantification (0.5–1 µg a.i./kg) in 86.7% of pollen and 98.6% of nectar samples and, unlike guttation fluid residues, were not correlated with measured soil residues. Residues in pollen and nectar are lower than reported sublethal adverse effect concentrations in studies with honeybee and bumble bee individuals and colonies fed only thiamethoxam‐treated sucrose, and are lower than those reported to result in no effects in honeybees, bumble bees, and solitary bees foraging on seed‐treated crops. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:709–721. © 2021 SYNGENTA. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-18 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9290588/ /pubmed/34292667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4498 Text en © 2021 SYNGENTA. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Health & Ecological Risk Assessment Thompson, Helen Vaughan, Sarah Mahlein, Anne‐Katrin Ladewig, Erwin Kenter, Christine Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment? |
title | Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment? |
title_full | Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment? |
title_fullStr | Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment? |
title_short | Is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment? |
title_sort | is there a risk to honeybees from use of thiamethoxam as a sugar beet seed treatment? |
topic | Health & Ecological Risk Assessment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34292667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4498 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonhelen istherearisktohoneybeesfromuseofthiamethoxamasasugarbeetseedtreatment AT vaughansarah istherearisktohoneybeesfromuseofthiamethoxamasasugarbeetseedtreatment AT mahleinannekatrin istherearisktohoneybeesfromuseofthiamethoxamasasugarbeetseedtreatment AT ladewigerwin istherearisktohoneybeesfromuseofthiamethoxamasasugarbeetseedtreatment AT kenterchristine istherearisktohoneybeesfromuseofthiamethoxamasasugarbeetseedtreatment |