Exploiting the Capabilities of Bayesian Networks for Engineering Risk Assessment: Causal Reasoning through Interventions

In the last decade, Bayesian networks (BNs) have been widely used in engineering risk assessment due to the benefits that they provide over other methods. Among these, the most significant is the ability to model systems, causal factors, and their dependencies in a probabilistic manner. This capability has enabled the community to do causal reasoning through associations, which answers questions such as: “How does new evidence [Formula: see text] about the occurrence of event [Formula: see text] change my belief about the occurrence of event [Formula: see text]?” Associative reasoning has helped risk analysts to identify relevant risk‐contributing factors and perform scenario analysis by evidence propagation. However, engineering risk assessment has yet to explore other features of BNs, such as the ability to reason through interventions, which enables the BN model to support answering questions of the form “How does doing [Formula: see text] change my belief about the occurrence of event [Formula: see text]?” In this article, we propose to expand the scope of use of BN models in engineering risk assessment to support intervention reasoning. This will provide more robust risk‐informed decision support by enabling the modeling of policies and actions before being implemented. To do this, we provide the formal mathematical background and tools to model interventions in BNs and propose a framework that enables its use in engineering risk assessment. This is demonstrated in an illustrative case study on third‐party damage of natural gas pipelines, showing how BNs can be used to inform decision‐makers about the effect that new actions/policies can have on a system.