Cargando…
Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern
Structural variants (SVs) are large rearrangements (>50 bp) within the genome that impact gene function and the content and structure of chromosomes. As a result, SVs are a significant source of functional genomic variation, that is, variation at genomic regions underpinning phenotype differences...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34424587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.16141 |
_version_ | 1784748943129706496 |
---|---|
author | Wold, Jana Koepfli, Klaus‐Peter Galla, Stephanie J. Eccles, David Hogg, Carolyn J. Le Lec, Marissa F. Guhlin, Joseph Santure, Anna W. Steeves, Tammy E. |
author_facet | Wold, Jana Koepfli, Klaus‐Peter Galla, Stephanie J. Eccles, David Hogg, Carolyn J. Le Lec, Marissa F. Guhlin, Joseph Santure, Anna W. Steeves, Tammy E. |
author_sort | Wold, Jana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Structural variants (SVs) are large rearrangements (>50 bp) within the genome that impact gene function and the content and structure of chromosomes. As a result, SVs are a significant source of functional genomic variation, that is, variation at genomic regions underpinning phenotype differences, that can have large effects on individual and population fitness. While there are increasing opportunities to investigate functional genomic variation in threatened species via single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data sets, SVs remain understudied despite their potential influence on fitness traits of conservation interest. In this future‐focused Opinion, we contend that characterizing SVs offers the conservation genomics community an exciting opportunity to complement SNP‐based approaches to enhance species recovery. We also leverage the existing literature–predominantly in human health, agriculture and ecoevolutionary biology–to identify approaches for readily characterizing SVs and consider how integrating these into the conservation genomics toolbox may transform the way we manage some of the world's most threatened species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9290615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92906152022-07-20 Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern Wold, Jana Koepfli, Klaus‐Peter Galla, Stephanie J. Eccles, David Hogg, Carolyn J. Le Lec, Marissa F. Guhlin, Joseph Santure, Anna W. Steeves, Tammy E. Mol Ecol Methodological Approaches and Advances for Wgs Structural variants (SVs) are large rearrangements (>50 bp) within the genome that impact gene function and the content and structure of chromosomes. As a result, SVs are a significant source of functional genomic variation, that is, variation at genomic regions underpinning phenotype differences, that can have large effects on individual and population fitness. While there are increasing opportunities to investigate functional genomic variation in threatened species via single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data sets, SVs remain understudied despite their potential influence on fitness traits of conservation interest. In this future‐focused Opinion, we contend that characterizing SVs offers the conservation genomics community an exciting opportunity to complement SNP‐based approaches to enhance species recovery. We also leverage the existing literature–predominantly in human health, agriculture and ecoevolutionary biology–to identify approaches for readily characterizing SVs and consider how integrating these into the conservation genomics toolbox may transform the way we manage some of the world's most threatened species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-12 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9290615/ /pubmed/34424587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.16141 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Methodological Approaches and Advances for Wgs Wold, Jana Koepfli, Klaus‐Peter Galla, Stephanie J. Eccles, David Hogg, Carolyn J. Le Lec, Marissa F. Guhlin, Joseph Santure, Anna W. Steeves, Tammy E. Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern |
title | Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern |
title_full | Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern |
title_fullStr | Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern |
title_full_unstemmed | Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern |
title_short | Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern |
title_sort | expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern |
topic | Methodological Approaches and Advances for Wgs |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34424587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.16141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woldjana expandingtheconservationgenomicstoolboxincorporatingstructuralvariantstoenhancegenomicstudiesforspeciesofconservationconcern AT koepfliklauspeter expandingtheconservationgenomicstoolboxincorporatingstructuralvariantstoenhancegenomicstudiesforspeciesofconservationconcern AT gallastephaniej expandingtheconservationgenomicstoolboxincorporatingstructuralvariantstoenhancegenomicstudiesforspeciesofconservationconcern AT ecclesdavid expandingtheconservationgenomicstoolboxincorporatingstructuralvariantstoenhancegenomicstudiesforspeciesofconservationconcern AT hoggcarolynj expandingtheconservationgenomicstoolboxincorporatingstructuralvariantstoenhancegenomicstudiesforspeciesofconservationconcern AT lelecmarissaf expandingtheconservationgenomicstoolboxincorporatingstructuralvariantstoenhancegenomicstudiesforspeciesofconservationconcern AT guhlinjoseph expandingtheconservationgenomicstoolboxincorporatingstructuralvariantstoenhancegenomicstudiesforspeciesofconservationconcern AT santureannaw expandingtheconservationgenomicstoolboxincorporatingstructuralvariantstoenhancegenomicstudiesforspeciesofconservationconcern AT steevestammye expandingtheconservationgenomicstoolboxincorporatingstructuralvariantstoenhancegenomicstudiesforspeciesofconservationconcern |