Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial
BACKGROUND: Mogamulizumab was compared with vorinostat in the phase 3 MAVORIC trial (NCT01728805) in 372 patients with relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) who had failed ≥1 prior systemic therapy. Mogamulizumab significantly prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS), w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17523 |
_version_ | 1784748974688698368 |
---|---|
author | Cowan, R.A. Scarisbrick, J.J. Zinzani, P.L. Nicolay, J.P. Sokol, L. Pinter‐Brown, L. Quaglino, P. Iversen, L. Dummer, R. Musiek, A. Foss, F. Ito, T. Rosen, J‐P. Medley, M.C. |
author_facet | Cowan, R.A. Scarisbrick, J.J. Zinzani, P.L. Nicolay, J.P. Sokol, L. Pinter‐Brown, L. Quaglino, P. Iversen, L. Dummer, R. Musiek, A. Foss, F. Ito, T. Rosen, J‐P. Medley, M.C. |
author_sort | Cowan, R.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mogamulizumab was compared with vorinostat in the phase 3 MAVORIC trial (NCT01728805) in 372 patients with relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) who had failed ≥1 prior systemic therapy. Mogamulizumab significantly prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS), with a superior objective response rate (ORR) vs. vorinostat. OBJECTIVES: This post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of baseline blood tumour burden on patient response to mogamulizumab. METHODS: PFS, ORR, time to next treatment (TTNT), skin response (modified Severity‐Weighted Assessment Tool [mSWAT]) and safety were assessed in patients stratified by blood classification (B0 [n = 126], B1 [n = 62], or B2 [n = 184], indicating increasing blood involvement). RESULTS: Investigator‐assessed PFS was longer for mogamulizumab versus vorinostat across all blood classes, significantly so for B1 and B2 patients. ORR was higher with mogamulizumab than with vorinostat in all blood classification groups and more markedly so with escalating B class (B0: 15.6% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.0549; B1: 25.8% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.2758; B2: 37.4% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.0001). TTNT was significantly longer for patients treated with mogamulizumab versus vorinostat with B1 (12.63 vs. 3.07 months; HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.16–0.67]; P = 0.0018) and B2 (13.07 vs. 3.53 months; HR 0.30 [95% CI 0.21–0.43]; P < 0.0001) blood involvement. In the mogamulizumab arm, 81 patients (43.5%) had ≥50% change in the mSWAT vs. 41 patients (22.0%) with vorinostat; mSWAT improvements with mogamulizumab occurred most often in B1 and B2 patients. Rapid, sustained reductions were seen in CD4(+)CD26(‐) cell counts and CD4:CD8 ratios in mogamulizumab patients for all B classes. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were less frequent overall with mogamulizumab and similar in frequency regardless of B class. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis indicates greater clinical benefit with mogamulizumab vs. vorinostat in patients with MF and SS classified as having B1 and B2 blood involvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9290719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92907192022-07-20 Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial Cowan, R.A. Scarisbrick, J.J. Zinzani, P.L. Nicolay, J.P. Sokol, L. Pinter‐Brown, L. Quaglino, P. Iversen, L. Dummer, R. Musiek, A. Foss, F. Ito, T. Rosen, J‐P. Medley, M.C. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology BACKGROUND: Mogamulizumab was compared with vorinostat in the phase 3 MAVORIC trial (NCT01728805) in 372 patients with relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) who had failed ≥1 prior systemic therapy. Mogamulizumab significantly prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS), with a superior objective response rate (ORR) vs. vorinostat. OBJECTIVES: This post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of baseline blood tumour burden on patient response to mogamulizumab. METHODS: PFS, ORR, time to next treatment (TTNT), skin response (modified Severity‐Weighted Assessment Tool [mSWAT]) and safety were assessed in patients stratified by blood classification (B0 [n = 126], B1 [n = 62], or B2 [n = 184], indicating increasing blood involvement). RESULTS: Investigator‐assessed PFS was longer for mogamulizumab versus vorinostat across all blood classes, significantly so for B1 and B2 patients. ORR was higher with mogamulizumab than with vorinostat in all blood classification groups and more markedly so with escalating B class (B0: 15.6% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.0549; B1: 25.8% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.2758; B2: 37.4% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.0001). TTNT was significantly longer for patients treated with mogamulizumab versus vorinostat with B1 (12.63 vs. 3.07 months; HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.16–0.67]; P = 0.0018) and B2 (13.07 vs. 3.53 months; HR 0.30 [95% CI 0.21–0.43]; P < 0.0001) blood involvement. In the mogamulizumab arm, 81 patients (43.5%) had ≥50% change in the mSWAT vs. 41 patients (22.0%) with vorinostat; mSWAT improvements with mogamulizumab occurred most often in B1 and B2 patients. Rapid, sustained reductions were seen in CD4(+)CD26(‐) cell counts and CD4:CD8 ratios in mogamulizumab patients for all B classes. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were less frequent overall with mogamulizumab and similar in frequency regardless of B class. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis indicates greater clinical benefit with mogamulizumab vs. vorinostat in patients with MF and SS classified as having B1 and B2 blood involvement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-20 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9290719/ /pubmed/34273208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17523 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology Cowan, R.A. Scarisbrick, J.J. Zinzani, P.L. Nicolay, J.P. Sokol, L. Pinter‐Brown, L. Quaglino, P. Iversen, L. Dummer, R. Musiek, A. Foss, F. Ito, T. Rosen, J‐P. Medley, M.C. Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial |
title | Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the mavoric trial |
topic | Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cowanra efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT scarisbrickjj efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT zinzanipl efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT nicolayjp efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT sokoll efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT pinterbrownl efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT quaglinop efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT iversenl efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT dummerr efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT musieka efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT fossf efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT itot efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT rosenjp efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial AT medleymc efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial |