Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial

BACKGROUND: Mogamulizumab was compared with vorinostat in the phase 3 MAVORIC trial (NCT01728805) in 372 patients with relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) who had failed ≥1 prior systemic therapy. Mogamulizumab significantly prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS), w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cowan, R.A., Scarisbrick, J.J., Zinzani, P.L., Nicolay, J.P., Sokol, L., Pinter‐Brown, L., Quaglino, P., Iversen, L., Dummer, R., Musiek, A., Foss, F., Ito, T., Rosen, J‐P., Medley, M.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17523
_version_ 1784748974688698368
author Cowan, R.A.
Scarisbrick, J.J.
Zinzani, P.L.
Nicolay, J.P.
Sokol, L.
Pinter‐Brown, L.
Quaglino, P.
Iversen, L.
Dummer, R.
Musiek, A.
Foss, F.
Ito, T.
Rosen, J‐P.
Medley, M.C.
author_facet Cowan, R.A.
Scarisbrick, J.J.
Zinzani, P.L.
Nicolay, J.P.
Sokol, L.
Pinter‐Brown, L.
Quaglino, P.
Iversen, L.
Dummer, R.
Musiek, A.
Foss, F.
Ito, T.
Rosen, J‐P.
Medley, M.C.
author_sort Cowan, R.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mogamulizumab was compared with vorinostat in the phase 3 MAVORIC trial (NCT01728805) in 372 patients with relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) who had failed ≥1 prior systemic therapy. Mogamulizumab significantly prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS), with a superior objective response rate (ORR) vs. vorinostat. OBJECTIVES: This post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of baseline blood tumour burden on patient response to mogamulizumab. METHODS: PFS, ORR, time to next treatment (TTNT), skin response (modified Severity‐Weighted Assessment Tool [mSWAT]) and safety were assessed in patients stratified by blood classification (B0 [n = 126], B1 [n = 62], or B2 [n = 184], indicating increasing blood involvement). RESULTS: Investigator‐assessed PFS was longer for mogamulizumab versus vorinostat across all blood classes, significantly so for B1 and B2 patients. ORR was higher with mogamulizumab than with vorinostat in all blood classification groups and more markedly so with escalating B class (B0: 15.6% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.0549; B1: 25.8% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.2758; B2: 37.4% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.0001). TTNT was significantly longer for patients treated with mogamulizumab versus vorinostat with B1 (12.63 vs. 3.07 months; HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.16–0.67]; P = 0.0018) and B2 (13.07 vs. 3.53 months; HR 0.30 [95% CI 0.21–0.43]; P < 0.0001) blood involvement. In the mogamulizumab arm, 81 patients (43.5%) had ≥50% change in the mSWAT vs. 41 patients (22.0%) with vorinostat; mSWAT improvements with mogamulizumab occurred most often in B1 and B2 patients. Rapid, sustained reductions were seen in CD4(+)CD26(‐) cell counts and CD4:CD8 ratios in mogamulizumab patients for all B classes. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were less frequent overall with mogamulizumab and similar in frequency regardless of B class. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis indicates greater clinical benefit with mogamulizumab vs. vorinostat in patients with MF and SS classified as having B1 and B2 blood involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92907192022-07-20 Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial Cowan, R.A. Scarisbrick, J.J. Zinzani, P.L. Nicolay, J.P. Sokol, L. Pinter‐Brown, L. Quaglino, P. Iversen, L. Dummer, R. Musiek, A. Foss, F. Ito, T. Rosen, J‐P. Medley, M.C. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology BACKGROUND: Mogamulizumab was compared with vorinostat in the phase 3 MAVORIC trial (NCT01728805) in 372 patients with relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) who had failed ≥1 prior systemic therapy. Mogamulizumab significantly prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS), with a superior objective response rate (ORR) vs. vorinostat. OBJECTIVES: This post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of baseline blood tumour burden on patient response to mogamulizumab. METHODS: PFS, ORR, time to next treatment (TTNT), skin response (modified Severity‐Weighted Assessment Tool [mSWAT]) and safety were assessed in patients stratified by blood classification (B0 [n = 126], B1 [n = 62], or B2 [n = 184], indicating increasing blood involvement). RESULTS: Investigator‐assessed PFS was longer for mogamulizumab versus vorinostat across all blood classes, significantly so for B1 and B2 patients. ORR was higher with mogamulizumab than with vorinostat in all blood classification groups and more markedly so with escalating B class (B0: 15.6% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.0549; B1: 25.8% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.2758; B2: 37.4% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.0001). TTNT was significantly longer for patients treated with mogamulizumab versus vorinostat with B1 (12.63 vs. 3.07 months; HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.16–0.67]; P = 0.0018) and B2 (13.07 vs. 3.53 months; HR 0.30 [95% CI 0.21–0.43]; P < 0.0001) blood involvement. In the mogamulizumab arm, 81 patients (43.5%) had ≥50% change in the mSWAT vs. 41 patients (22.0%) with vorinostat; mSWAT improvements with mogamulizumab occurred most often in B1 and B2 patients. Rapid, sustained reductions were seen in CD4(+)CD26(‐) cell counts and CD4:CD8 ratios in mogamulizumab patients for all B classes. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were less frequent overall with mogamulizumab and similar in frequency regardless of B class. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis indicates greater clinical benefit with mogamulizumab vs. vorinostat in patients with MF and SS classified as having B1 and B2 blood involvement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-20 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9290719/ /pubmed/34273208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17523 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology
Cowan, R.A.
Scarisbrick, J.J.
Zinzani, P.L.
Nicolay, J.P.
Sokol, L.
Pinter‐Brown, L.
Quaglino, P.
Iversen, L.
Dummer, R.
Musiek, A.
Foss, F.
Ito, T.
Rosen, J‐P.
Medley, M.C.
Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial
title Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the MAVORIC trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab by patient baseline blood tumour burden: a post hoc analysis of the mavoric trial
topic Original Articles and Short Reports Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17523
work_keys_str_mv AT cowanra efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT scarisbrickjj efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT zinzanipl efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT nicolayjp efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT sokoll efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT pinterbrownl efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT quaglinop efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT iversenl efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT dummerr efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT musieka efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT fossf efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT itot efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT rosenjp efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial
AT medleymc efficacyandsafetyofmogamulizumabbypatientbaselinebloodtumourburdenaposthocanalysisofthemavorictrial