Cargando…

Airborne particulate concentration during non‐thermal nano‐pulse stimulation wart clearance is negligible compared to thermal modalities

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: As clinicians continue to implement safety protocols amid the global pandemic, considerations to mitigate potential viral transmission of airborne particulates (plume) generated from certain dermatologic procedures are of growing interest. This study intended to measure the cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ross, Edward V., Newman, James, Ravichandran, Jayachandran, Nuccitelli, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34431551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23468
_version_ 1784748978543263744
author Ross, Edward V.
Newman, James
Ravichandran, Jayachandran
Nuccitelli, Richard
author_facet Ross, Edward V.
Newman, James
Ravichandran, Jayachandran
Nuccitelli, Richard
author_sort Ross, Edward V.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: As clinicians continue to implement safety protocols amid the global pandemic, considerations to mitigate potential viral transmission of airborne particulates (plume) generated from certain dermatologic procedures are of growing interest. This study intended to measure the change in airborne particulate matter using a non‐thermal energy modality called nano‐pulse stimulation (NPS) and compare levels of concentration to common thermal modalities (CO2 laser and electrocautery). NPS is a new non‐thermal modality that applies nanosecond pulses of electrical energy to induce regulated cell death in cellular structures while sparing the surrounding acellular structure of the dermis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used a Condensation Particle Counter during four types of dermatologic procedures: (1) using non‐thermal NPS for the clearance of cutaneous, nongenital warts; (2) an electrocautery treatment of warts; (3) a CO(2) laser for facial resurfacing; and (4) an electrocautery procedure for a facelift. Four subjects and a total of 11 warts were treated with NPS while a particle counter was used to detect the average particles per cubic centimeter once per second. The same particle counter was used, for comparison, during a wart removal procedure using electrocautery for comparison, and for control, during a skin resurfacing procedure with a CO(2) laser and a facelift in which electrocautery was used. RESULTS: Only one of the 11 NPS wart procedures generated any detectable change in the particulate concentration and that change was negligible in comparison to the increase in particulate concentration measured during the CO(2) laser resurfacing and the electrocautery use during a facelift procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Procedures using non‐thermal NPS technology do not generate significant plume when applied to eliminate warts, suggesting it is unlikely that this new energy modality would release viral DNA into the air.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92907342022-07-20 Airborne particulate concentration during non‐thermal nano‐pulse stimulation wart clearance is negligible compared to thermal modalities Ross, Edward V. Newman, James Ravichandran, Jayachandran Nuccitelli, Richard Lasers Surg Med Basic Science ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: As clinicians continue to implement safety protocols amid the global pandemic, considerations to mitigate potential viral transmission of airborne particulates (plume) generated from certain dermatologic procedures are of growing interest. This study intended to measure the change in airborne particulate matter using a non‐thermal energy modality called nano‐pulse stimulation (NPS) and compare levels of concentration to common thermal modalities (CO2 laser and electrocautery). NPS is a new non‐thermal modality that applies nanosecond pulses of electrical energy to induce regulated cell death in cellular structures while sparing the surrounding acellular structure of the dermis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used a Condensation Particle Counter during four types of dermatologic procedures: (1) using non‐thermal NPS for the clearance of cutaneous, nongenital warts; (2) an electrocautery treatment of warts; (3) a CO(2) laser for facial resurfacing; and (4) an electrocautery procedure for a facelift. Four subjects and a total of 11 warts were treated with NPS while a particle counter was used to detect the average particles per cubic centimeter once per second. The same particle counter was used, for comparison, during a wart removal procedure using electrocautery for comparison, and for control, during a skin resurfacing procedure with a CO(2) laser and a facelift in which electrocautery was used. RESULTS: Only one of the 11 NPS wart procedures generated any detectable change in the particulate concentration and that change was negligible in comparison to the increase in particulate concentration measured during the CO(2) laser resurfacing and the electrocautery use during a facelift procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Procedures using non‐thermal NPS technology do not generate significant plume when applied to eliminate warts, suggesting it is unlikely that this new energy modality would release viral DNA into the air. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-25 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9290734/ /pubmed/34431551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23468 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Basic Science
Ross, Edward V.
Newman, James
Ravichandran, Jayachandran
Nuccitelli, Richard
Airborne particulate concentration during non‐thermal nano‐pulse stimulation wart clearance is negligible compared to thermal modalities
title Airborne particulate concentration during non‐thermal nano‐pulse stimulation wart clearance is negligible compared to thermal modalities
title_full Airborne particulate concentration during non‐thermal nano‐pulse stimulation wart clearance is negligible compared to thermal modalities
title_fullStr Airborne particulate concentration during non‐thermal nano‐pulse stimulation wart clearance is negligible compared to thermal modalities
title_full_unstemmed Airborne particulate concentration during non‐thermal nano‐pulse stimulation wart clearance is negligible compared to thermal modalities
title_short Airborne particulate concentration during non‐thermal nano‐pulse stimulation wart clearance is negligible compared to thermal modalities
title_sort airborne particulate concentration during non‐thermal nano‐pulse stimulation wart clearance is negligible compared to thermal modalities
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34431551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23468
work_keys_str_mv AT rossedwardv airborneparticulateconcentrationduringnonthermalnanopulsestimulationwartclearanceisnegligiblecomparedtothermalmodalities
AT newmanjames airborneparticulateconcentrationduringnonthermalnanopulsestimulationwartclearanceisnegligiblecomparedtothermalmodalities
AT ravichandranjayachandran airborneparticulateconcentrationduringnonthermalnanopulsestimulationwartclearanceisnegligiblecomparedtothermalmodalities
AT nuccitellirichard airborneparticulateconcentrationduringnonthermalnanopulsestimulationwartclearanceisnegligiblecomparedtothermalmodalities