Cargando…

Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire

AIMS: To develop a questionnaire to identify Intensive Care survivor needs at key transitions during the recovery process, and assess its validity and reliability in a group of ICU survivors. METHODS: Development of the Support Needs After ICU (SNAC) questionnaire was based on a systematic scoping r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Neill, Brenda, Linden, Mark, Ramsay, Pam, Darweish Medniuk, Alia, Outtrim, Joanne, King, Judy, Blackwood, Bronagh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34387920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12695
_version_ 1784748994909437952
author O'Neill, Brenda
Linden, Mark
Ramsay, Pam
Darweish Medniuk, Alia
Outtrim, Joanne
King, Judy
Blackwood, Bronagh
author_facet O'Neill, Brenda
Linden, Mark
Ramsay, Pam
Darweish Medniuk, Alia
Outtrim, Joanne
King, Judy
Blackwood, Bronagh
author_sort O'Neill, Brenda
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To develop a questionnaire to identify Intensive Care survivor needs at key transitions during the recovery process, and assess its validity and reliability in a group of ICU survivors. METHODS: Development of the Support Needs After ICU (SNAC) questionnaire was based on a systematic scoping review, and analysis of patient interviews (n = 22). Face and content validity were assessed by service users (n = 12) and an expert panel of healthcare professionals (n = 6). A pilot survey among 200 ICU survivors assessed recruitment at one of five different stages after ICU discharge [(1) in hospital, (2) < 6 weeks, (3) 7 weeks to 6 months, (4) 7 to 12 months, or (5) 12 to 24 months post‐hospital discharge]; to assess reliability of the SNAC questionnaire; and to conduct exploratory data analysis. Reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency; intraclass correlation coefficients for test–retest reliability. We explored correlations with sociodemographic variables using Pearson's correlation coefficient; differences between questionnaire scores and patient demographics using one‐way ANOVA. RESULTS: The SNAC questionnaire consisted of 32 items that assessed five categories of support needs (informational, emotional, instrumental [e.g. practical physical help, provision of equipment or training], appraisal [e.g. clinician feedback on recovery] and spiritual needs). ICU survivors were recruited from Northern Ireland, England and Scotland. From a total of 375 questionnaires distributed, 202 (54%) were returned. The questionnaire had high internal consistency (0.97) and high test–retest reliability (r = 0.8) with subcategories ranging from 0.3 to 0.9. CONCLUSIONS: The SNAC questionnaire appears to be a comprehensive, valid, and reliable questionnaire. Further research will enable more robust examination of its properties e.g. factor analysis, and establish its utility in identifying whether patients' support needs evolve over time. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The SNAC questionnaire has the potential to be used to identify ICU survivors' needs and inform post‐hospital support services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92908032022-07-20 Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire O'Neill, Brenda Linden, Mark Ramsay, Pam Darweish Medniuk, Alia Outtrim, Joanne King, Judy Blackwood, Bronagh Nurs Crit Care Research AIMS: To develop a questionnaire to identify Intensive Care survivor needs at key transitions during the recovery process, and assess its validity and reliability in a group of ICU survivors. METHODS: Development of the Support Needs After ICU (SNAC) questionnaire was based on a systematic scoping review, and analysis of patient interviews (n = 22). Face and content validity were assessed by service users (n = 12) and an expert panel of healthcare professionals (n = 6). A pilot survey among 200 ICU survivors assessed recruitment at one of five different stages after ICU discharge [(1) in hospital, (2) < 6 weeks, (3) 7 weeks to 6 months, (4) 7 to 12 months, or (5) 12 to 24 months post‐hospital discharge]; to assess reliability of the SNAC questionnaire; and to conduct exploratory data analysis. Reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency; intraclass correlation coefficients for test–retest reliability. We explored correlations with sociodemographic variables using Pearson's correlation coefficient; differences between questionnaire scores and patient demographics using one‐way ANOVA. RESULTS: The SNAC questionnaire consisted of 32 items that assessed five categories of support needs (informational, emotional, instrumental [e.g. practical physical help, provision of equipment or training], appraisal [e.g. clinician feedback on recovery] and spiritual needs). ICU survivors were recruited from Northern Ireland, England and Scotland. From a total of 375 questionnaires distributed, 202 (54%) were returned. The questionnaire had high internal consistency (0.97) and high test–retest reliability (r = 0.8) with subcategories ranging from 0.3 to 0.9. CONCLUSIONS: The SNAC questionnaire appears to be a comprehensive, valid, and reliable questionnaire. Further research will enable more robust examination of its properties e.g. factor analysis, and establish its utility in identifying whether patients' support needs evolve over time. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The SNAC questionnaire has the potential to be used to identify ICU survivors' needs and inform post‐hospital support services. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-08-13 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9290803/ /pubmed/34387920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12695 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Nursing in Critical Care published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd on behalf of British Association of Critical Care Nurses. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
O'Neill, Brenda
Linden, Mark
Ramsay, Pam
Darweish Medniuk, Alia
Outtrim, Joanne
King, Judy
Blackwood, Bronagh
Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire
title Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire
title_full Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire
title_fullStr Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire
title_short Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire
title_sort development of the support needs after icu (snac) questionnaire
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34387920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12695
work_keys_str_mv AT oneillbrenda developmentofthesupportneedsaftericusnacquestionnaire
AT lindenmark developmentofthesupportneedsaftericusnacquestionnaire
AT ramsaypam developmentofthesupportneedsaftericusnacquestionnaire
AT darweishmedniukalia developmentofthesupportneedsaftericusnacquestionnaire
AT outtrimjoanne developmentofthesupportneedsaftericusnacquestionnaire
AT kingjudy developmentofthesupportneedsaftericusnacquestionnaire
AT blackwoodbronagh developmentofthesupportneedsaftericusnacquestionnaire