Cargando…

Three‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open‐angle glaucoma: a multicentre study

PURPOSE: To assess the 3‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent implanted ab interno in open‐angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: This study was a multicentre, retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with OAG who underwent ab‐interno gel stent placement alone or combined with phacoe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reitsamer, Herbert, Vera, Vanessa, Ruben, Simon, Au, Leon, Vila‐Arteaga, Jorge, Teus, Miguel, Lenzhofer, Markus, Shirlaw, Andrew, Bai, Zhanying, Balaram, Mini, Stalmans, Ingeborg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33973370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14886
_version_ 1784749034001399808
author Reitsamer, Herbert
Vera, Vanessa
Ruben, Simon
Au, Leon
Vila‐Arteaga, Jorge
Teus, Miguel
Lenzhofer, Markus
Shirlaw, Andrew
Bai, Zhanying
Balaram, Mini
Stalmans, Ingeborg
author_facet Reitsamer, Herbert
Vera, Vanessa
Ruben, Simon
Au, Leon
Vila‐Arteaga, Jorge
Teus, Miguel
Lenzhofer, Markus
Shirlaw, Andrew
Bai, Zhanying
Balaram, Mini
Stalmans, Ingeborg
author_sort Reitsamer, Herbert
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the 3‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent implanted ab interno in open‐angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: This study was a multicentre, retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with OAG who underwent ab‐interno gel stent placement alone or combined with phacoemulsification between 1 January 2014 and 1 October 2015. Outcome measures included mean changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and IOP‐lowering medication count from medicated baseline at 1, 2, 3 (primary outcome) and 4 years (if available) postimplantation. Intraoperative complications, adverse events of special interest (AESIs) and secondary surgical interventions (SSIs) were recorded. RESULTS: The safety and effectiveness populations included 212 eyes (primary and secondary) and 174 eyes (primary), respectively. Mean IOP and medication decreased from 20.7 mmHg and 2.5 at baseline (n = 163 primary/first implanted eyes) to 13.9 mmHg and 1.1 medications (n = 76) at 3 years postimplantation, respectively. Mean changes from baseline in IOP (−5.6, −6.2 and −6.6 mmHg) and IOP‐lowering medication count (−1.8, −1.6 and −1.4) were statistically significant at 1, 2 and 3 years postimplantation, respectively. Results appeared comparable when implantation was performed with (n = 76) or without (n = 98) phacoemulsification. In primary eyes with 4‐year IOP and medication count data (n = 27), mean IOP was 14.0 mmHg on 1.3 medications at 4 years postimplantation. Fifteen (7.1%) eyes had intraoperative complications, 31 (14.6%) experienced 46 postoperative AESIs, and 26 (12.3%) required SSI. CONCLUSION: The gel stent effectively lowered IOP and IOP‐lowering medication count over 3 years, with a predictable and acceptable safety profile, when implanted via the traditional ab‐interno technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9290976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92909762022-07-20 Three‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open‐angle glaucoma: a multicentre study Reitsamer, Herbert Vera, Vanessa Ruben, Simon Au, Leon Vila‐Arteaga, Jorge Teus, Miguel Lenzhofer, Markus Shirlaw, Andrew Bai, Zhanying Balaram, Mini Stalmans, Ingeborg Acta Ophthalmol Original Articles PURPOSE: To assess the 3‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent implanted ab interno in open‐angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: This study was a multicentre, retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with OAG who underwent ab‐interno gel stent placement alone or combined with phacoemulsification between 1 January 2014 and 1 October 2015. Outcome measures included mean changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and IOP‐lowering medication count from medicated baseline at 1, 2, 3 (primary outcome) and 4 years (if available) postimplantation. Intraoperative complications, adverse events of special interest (AESIs) and secondary surgical interventions (SSIs) were recorded. RESULTS: The safety and effectiveness populations included 212 eyes (primary and secondary) and 174 eyes (primary), respectively. Mean IOP and medication decreased from 20.7 mmHg and 2.5 at baseline (n = 163 primary/first implanted eyes) to 13.9 mmHg and 1.1 medications (n = 76) at 3 years postimplantation, respectively. Mean changes from baseline in IOP (−5.6, −6.2 and −6.6 mmHg) and IOP‐lowering medication count (−1.8, −1.6 and −1.4) were statistically significant at 1, 2 and 3 years postimplantation, respectively. Results appeared comparable when implantation was performed with (n = 76) or without (n = 98) phacoemulsification. In primary eyes with 4‐year IOP and medication count data (n = 27), mean IOP was 14.0 mmHg on 1.3 medications at 4 years postimplantation. Fifteen (7.1%) eyes had intraoperative complications, 31 (14.6%) experienced 46 postoperative AESIs, and 26 (12.3%) required SSI. CONCLUSION: The gel stent effectively lowered IOP and IOP‐lowering medication count over 3 years, with a predictable and acceptable safety profile, when implanted via the traditional ab‐interno technique. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-10 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9290976/ /pubmed/33973370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14886 Text en © 2021 AbbVie Inc. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Reitsamer, Herbert
Vera, Vanessa
Ruben, Simon
Au, Leon
Vila‐Arteaga, Jorge
Teus, Miguel
Lenzhofer, Markus
Shirlaw, Andrew
Bai, Zhanying
Balaram, Mini
Stalmans, Ingeborg
Three‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open‐angle glaucoma: a multicentre study
title Three‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open‐angle glaucoma: a multicentre study
title_full Three‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open‐angle glaucoma: a multicentre study
title_fullStr Three‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open‐angle glaucoma: a multicentre study
title_full_unstemmed Three‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open‐angle glaucoma: a multicentre study
title_short Three‐year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open‐angle glaucoma: a multicentre study
title_sort three‐year effectiveness and safety of the xen gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open‐angle glaucoma: a multicentre study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33973370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.14886
work_keys_str_mv AT reitsamerherbert threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT veravanessa threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT rubensimon threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT auleon threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT vilaarteagajorge threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT teusmiguel threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT lenzhofermarkus threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT shirlawandrew threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT baizhanying threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT balarammini threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy
AT stalmansingeborg threeyeareffectivenessandsafetyofthexengelstentasasoloprocedureorincombinationwithphacoemulsificationinopenangleglaucomaamulticentrestudy