Cargando…

Students’ understanding and support for anti‐racism in universities

Critical Race Theory (CRT) suggests psychology’s contribution to racism takes various forms. Abstractly, racism is promoted through psychology’s flawed theoretical conceptualization as an individualized, inevitable occurrence. Concretely, it occurs because psychology is one of the most popular reaso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jankowski, Glen S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34254318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12482
_version_ 1784749050033078272
author Jankowski, Glen S.
author_facet Jankowski, Glen S.
author_sort Jankowski, Glen S.
collection PubMed
description Critical Race Theory (CRT) suggests psychology’s contribution to racism takes various forms. Abstractly, racism is promoted through psychology’s flawed theoretical conceptualization as an individualized, inevitable occurrence. Concretely, it occurs because psychology is one of the most popular reasons students come to university and Black Asian and Minoritized Ethnic (BAME) students report racist harassment and less access to formal support whilst there. This racism and student‐proposed anti‐racist recommendations are often ignored. Concretely assessing what racism students face, assessing how students understand racism, and demonstrating student support for anti‐racist recommendations, are CRT‐informed methods of challenging university racism. White (n = 213) and BAME (n = 182) UK students were asked about their estimation of racism, any positive action and discrimination experienced, and their access to university support. Participants were also randomized into multiple conditions where five anti‐racist recommendations were proposed (by Professors N. Patel, R. Smith, or no one). Participant consensus was found in high racism estimations, in benefiting from similar positive actions and in accessing four types of university support. However, White students underestimated racism more so, received less discrimination, and reported more access to three university support types. Almost all participants supported the recommendations regardless of proposer. These results suggest the implementation of anti‐racist recommendations converges with university’s interests as student stakeholder support them. Psychologists in universities can advocate for these recommendations and take other anti‐racist actions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92910392022-07-20 Students’ understanding and support for anti‐racism in universities Jankowski, Glen S. Br J Soc Psychol Original Articles Critical Race Theory (CRT) suggests psychology’s contribution to racism takes various forms. Abstractly, racism is promoted through psychology’s flawed theoretical conceptualization as an individualized, inevitable occurrence. Concretely, it occurs because psychology is one of the most popular reasons students come to university and Black Asian and Minoritized Ethnic (BAME) students report racist harassment and less access to formal support whilst there. This racism and student‐proposed anti‐racist recommendations are often ignored. Concretely assessing what racism students face, assessing how students understand racism, and demonstrating student support for anti‐racist recommendations, are CRT‐informed methods of challenging university racism. White (n = 213) and BAME (n = 182) UK students were asked about their estimation of racism, any positive action and discrimination experienced, and their access to university support. Participants were also randomized into multiple conditions where five anti‐racist recommendations were proposed (by Professors N. Patel, R. Smith, or no one). Participant consensus was found in high racism estimations, in benefiting from similar positive actions and in accessing four types of university support. However, White students underestimated racism more so, received less discrimination, and reported more access to three university support types. Almost all participants supported the recommendations regardless of proposer. These results suggest the implementation of anti‐racist recommendations converges with university’s interests as student stakeholder support them. Psychologists in universities can advocate for these recommendations and take other anti‐racist actions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-13 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9291039/ /pubmed/34254318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12482 Text en © 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jankowski, Glen S.
Students’ understanding and support for anti‐racism in universities
title Students’ understanding and support for anti‐racism in universities
title_full Students’ understanding and support for anti‐racism in universities
title_fullStr Students’ understanding and support for anti‐racism in universities
title_full_unstemmed Students’ understanding and support for anti‐racism in universities
title_short Students’ understanding and support for anti‐racism in universities
title_sort students’ understanding and support for anti‐racism in universities
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34254318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12482
work_keys_str_mv AT jankowskiglens studentsunderstandingandsupportforantiracisminuniversities