Cargando…

Differential effects of speed and volume on transfusion‐associated circulatory overload: A randomized study in rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transfusion‐associated circulatory overload (TACO) is the primary cause of transfusion‐related mortality. Speed and volume of transfusion are major risk factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the interaction of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion speed and volume o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klanderman, Robert B., Wijnberge, Marije, Bosboom, Joachim J., Roelofs, Joris J. T. H., de Korte, Dirk, van Bruggen, Robin, Hollmann, Markus W., Vroom, Margreeth B., Veelo, Denise P., Juffermans, Nicole P., Geerts, Bart F., Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.13191
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transfusion‐associated circulatory overload (TACO) is the primary cause of transfusion‐related mortality. Speed and volume of transfusion are major risk factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the interaction of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion speed and volume on the development of TACO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated model for TACO in anaemic Lewis rats with an acute myocardial infarction was used. The effect on pulmonary hydrostatic pressure of one, two or four units of packed RBCs transfused in either 30 or 60 min was evaluated (3.3–26.6 ml·kg(−1)·hr(−1)). Pulmonary capillary pressure was measured as left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Cardiac stress biomarkers atrial natriuretic‐peptide (ANP) and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) were measured 1‐h post‐transfusion. RESULTS: Thirty animals were included (n = 5 per group). Transfusion of RBCs increased LVEDP in a volume‐dependent manner (ΔLVEDP [mmHg]: −0.95, +0.50, +6.26, p < 0.001). Fast transfusion increased overall ΔLVEDP by +3.5 mmHg and up to +11.8 mmHg in the four units' group (p = 0.016). Doubling transfusion speed increased ΔLVEDP more than doubling volume in the larger volume groups. No difference in ANP or NT‐proBNP were seen in high transfusion volume or groups. CONCLUSION: Transfusion volume dose‐dependently increased LVEDP, with speed of transfusion rapidly elevating LVEDP at higher transfusion volumes. ANP and NT‐proBNP were not impacted by transfusion volume or speed in this model. TACO is seen as purely volume overload, however, this study emphasizes that limiting transfusion speed, as a modifiable risk factor, might aid in preventing TACO.