Cargando…

Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception—A scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have been performed assessing optimal treatment regimens for evacuating (retained) products of conception from the uterus, but standardized criteria for diagnosing retained products of conception (RPOC) are still lacking. We aim to provide an overview of diagnostic cri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamel, Charlotte C., van Wessel, Steffi, Carnegy, Alasdair, Coppus, Sjors F. P. J., Snijders, Marc P. M. L., Clark, Justin, Emanuel, Mark H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14229
_version_ 1784749065702998016
author Hamel, Charlotte C.
van Wessel, Steffi
Carnegy, Alasdair
Coppus, Sjors F. P. J.
Snijders, Marc P. M. L.
Clark, Justin
Emanuel, Mark H.
author_facet Hamel, Charlotte C.
van Wessel, Steffi
Carnegy, Alasdair
Coppus, Sjors F. P. J.
Snijders, Marc P. M. L.
Clark, Justin
Emanuel, Mark H.
author_sort Hamel, Charlotte C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have been performed assessing optimal treatment regimens for evacuating (retained) products of conception from the uterus, but standardized criteria for diagnosing retained products of conception (RPOC) are still lacking. We aim to provide an overview of diagnostic criteria in current literature, used to diagnose RPOC after induced first‐trimester abortion or early pregnancy loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched systematically up until March 2020 for English articles reporting on induced abortion or early pregnancy loss. Articles not specifying diagnostic criteria used to assess completeness of treatment were excluded, as were conference abstracts, expert opinions, reviews, and case reports. Four elements of diagnostic criteria were described: diagnostic tools, parameters used within these tools, applied cut‐off values, and timing of follow up. Additionally, a meta‐analysis was performed assessing diagnostic qualities of the most often applied diagnostic tool and parameter. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 1233 unique articles, of which 248 were included, with a total of 339 517 participants. In the 79 included randomized controlled trials, six diagnostic tools to assess RPOC were identified, combined in 14 ways, with 55 different cut‐off values. In 169 observational studies, seven diagnostic tools were identified, used in 28 combinations, applying 89 different cut‐off values. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness with a cut‐off value of at least 15 mm indicating RPOC, was used most frequently. In the timing of follow‐up there was great variation, with 55 and 107 different combinations in randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. Assessment of treatment success was scheduled most often around 2 weeks after treatment. Diagnostic qualities of endometrial thickness of 15 mm or more was not adequately assessed. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the way RPOC are assessed, and the criteria used to define RPOC following induced abortion and early pregnancy loss; ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness, with a cut‐off of 15 mm or more 2 weeks after primary treatment is the most widely used diagnostic approach. A meta‐analysis on diagnostic accuracy of endometrial thickness of 15 mm or more did not lead to solid results. These findings can be a first step to develop a workable standard of establishing RPOC after induced abortion or early pregnancy loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92911042022-07-20 Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception—A scoping review Hamel, Charlotte C. van Wessel, Steffi Carnegy, Alasdair Coppus, Sjors F. P. J. Snijders, Marc P. M. L. Clark, Justin Emanuel, Mark H. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Systematic Reviews INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have been performed assessing optimal treatment regimens for evacuating (retained) products of conception from the uterus, but standardized criteria for diagnosing retained products of conception (RPOC) are still lacking. We aim to provide an overview of diagnostic criteria in current literature, used to diagnose RPOC after induced first‐trimester abortion or early pregnancy loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched systematically up until March 2020 for English articles reporting on induced abortion or early pregnancy loss. Articles not specifying diagnostic criteria used to assess completeness of treatment were excluded, as were conference abstracts, expert opinions, reviews, and case reports. Four elements of diagnostic criteria were described: diagnostic tools, parameters used within these tools, applied cut‐off values, and timing of follow up. Additionally, a meta‐analysis was performed assessing diagnostic qualities of the most often applied diagnostic tool and parameter. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 1233 unique articles, of which 248 were included, with a total of 339 517 participants. In the 79 included randomized controlled trials, six diagnostic tools to assess RPOC were identified, combined in 14 ways, with 55 different cut‐off values. In 169 observational studies, seven diagnostic tools were identified, used in 28 combinations, applying 89 different cut‐off values. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness with a cut‐off value of at least 15 mm indicating RPOC, was used most frequently. In the timing of follow‐up there was great variation, with 55 and 107 different combinations in randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. Assessment of treatment success was scheduled most often around 2 weeks after treatment. Diagnostic qualities of endometrial thickness of 15 mm or more was not adequately assessed. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the way RPOC are assessed, and the criteria used to define RPOC following induced abortion and early pregnancy loss; ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness, with a cut‐off of 15 mm or more 2 weeks after primary treatment is the most widely used diagnostic approach. A meta‐analysis on diagnostic accuracy of endometrial thickness of 15 mm or more did not lead to solid results. These findings can be a first step to develop a workable standard of establishing RPOC after induced abortion or early pregnancy loss. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-12 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9291104/ /pubmed/34244998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14229 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Hamel, Charlotte C.
van Wessel, Steffi
Carnegy, Alasdair
Coppus, Sjors F. P. J.
Snijders, Marc P. M. L.
Clark, Justin
Emanuel, Mark H.
Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception—A scoping review
title Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception—A scoping review
title_full Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception—A scoping review
title_fullStr Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception—A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception—A scoping review
title_short Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception—A scoping review
title_sort diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception—a scoping review
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14229
work_keys_str_mv AT hamelcharlottec diagnosticcriteriaforretainedproductsofconceptionascopingreview
AT vanwesselsteffi diagnosticcriteriaforretainedproductsofconceptionascopingreview
AT carnegyalasdair diagnosticcriteriaforretainedproductsofconceptionascopingreview
AT coppussjorsfpj diagnosticcriteriaforretainedproductsofconceptionascopingreview
AT snijdersmarcpml diagnosticcriteriaforretainedproductsofconceptionascopingreview
AT clarkjustin diagnosticcriteriaforretainedproductsofconceptionascopingreview
AT emanuelmarkh diagnosticcriteriaforretainedproductsofconceptionascopingreview