Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single‐dose nasal spray (MDZ–NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs). METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial (Clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31140596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.15159 |
_version_ | 1784749075511377920 |
---|---|
author | Detyniecki, Kamil Van Ess, Peter J. Sequeira, David J. Wheless, James W. Meng, Tze‐Chiang Pullman, William E. |
author_facet | Detyniecki, Kamil Van Ess, Peter J. Sequeira, David J. Wheless, James W. Meng, Tze‐Chiang Pullman, William E. |
author_sort | Detyniecki, Kamil |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single‐dose nasal spray (MDZ–NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs). METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390220) with patients age ≥12 years on a stable regimen of antiepileptic drugs. Following an in‐clinic test dose phase (TDP), patients entered an outpatient comparative phase (CP) and were randomized (2:1) to receive double‐blind MDZ–NS 5 mg or placebo nasal spray, administered by caregivers when they experienced an SC. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success (seizure termination within 10 minutes and no recurrence 10 minutes to 6 hours after trial drug administration). Secondary efficacy end points were proportion of patients with seizure recurrence 10 minutes to 4 hours, and time‐to‐next seizure >10 minutes after double‐blind drug administration. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: Of 292 patients administered a test dose, 262 patients were randomized, and 201 received double‐blind treatment for an SC (n = 134 MDZ–NS, n = 67 placebo, modified intent‐to‐treat population). A significantly greater proportion of MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients achieved treatment success (53.7% vs 34.4%; P = 0.0109). Significantly, fewer MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients experienced seizure recurrence (38.1% vs 59.7%; P = 0.0043). Time‐to‐next seizure analysis showed early separation (within 30 minutes) between MDZ–NS and placebo that was maintained throughout the 24‐hour observation period (21% difference at 24 hours; P = 0.0124). Sixteen patients (5.5%) discontinued because of a treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the TDP and none during the CP. During the CP, 27.6% and 22.4% of patients in the MDZ–NS and placebo groups, respectively, experienced ≥1 TEAE. SIGNIFICANCE: MDZ–NS was superior to placebo in providing rapid, sustained seizure control when administered to patients experiencing an SC in the outpatient setting and was associated with a favorable safety profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9291143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92911432022-07-20 Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial Detyniecki, Kamil Van Ess, Peter J. Sequeira, David J. Wheless, James W. Meng, Tze‐Chiang Pullman, William E. Epilepsia Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single‐dose nasal spray (MDZ–NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs). METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390220) with patients age ≥12 years on a stable regimen of antiepileptic drugs. Following an in‐clinic test dose phase (TDP), patients entered an outpatient comparative phase (CP) and were randomized (2:1) to receive double‐blind MDZ–NS 5 mg or placebo nasal spray, administered by caregivers when they experienced an SC. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success (seizure termination within 10 minutes and no recurrence 10 minutes to 6 hours after trial drug administration). Secondary efficacy end points were proportion of patients with seizure recurrence 10 minutes to 4 hours, and time‐to‐next seizure >10 minutes after double‐blind drug administration. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: Of 292 patients administered a test dose, 262 patients were randomized, and 201 received double‐blind treatment for an SC (n = 134 MDZ–NS, n = 67 placebo, modified intent‐to‐treat population). A significantly greater proportion of MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients achieved treatment success (53.7% vs 34.4%; P = 0.0109). Significantly, fewer MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients experienced seizure recurrence (38.1% vs 59.7%; P = 0.0043). Time‐to‐next seizure analysis showed early separation (within 30 minutes) between MDZ–NS and placebo that was maintained throughout the 24‐hour observation period (21% difference at 24 hours; P = 0.0124). Sixteen patients (5.5%) discontinued because of a treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the TDP and none during the CP. During the CP, 27.6% and 22.4% of patients in the MDZ–NS and placebo groups, respectively, experienced ≥1 TEAE. SIGNIFICANCE: MDZ–NS was superior to placebo in providing rapid, sustained seizure control when administered to patients experiencing an SC in the outpatient setting and was associated with a favorable safety profile. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-29 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9291143/ /pubmed/31140596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.15159 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Full‐length Original Research Detyniecki, Kamil Van Ess, Peter J. Sequeira, David J. Wheless, James W. Meng, Tze‐Chiang Pullman, William E. Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial |
title | Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial |
topic | Full‐length Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31140596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.15159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT detynieckikamil safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial AT vanesspeterj safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial AT sequeiradavidj safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial AT whelessjamesw safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial AT mengtzechiang safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial AT pullmanwilliame safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial |