Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single‐dose nasal spray (MDZ–NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs). METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial (Clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Detyniecki, Kamil, Van Ess, Peter J., Sequeira, David J., Wheless, James W., Meng, Tze‐Chiang, Pullman, William E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31140596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.15159
_version_ 1784749075511377920
author Detyniecki, Kamil
Van Ess, Peter J.
Sequeira, David J.
Wheless, James W.
Meng, Tze‐Chiang
Pullman, William E.
author_facet Detyniecki, Kamil
Van Ess, Peter J.
Sequeira, David J.
Wheless, James W.
Meng, Tze‐Chiang
Pullman, William E.
author_sort Detyniecki, Kamil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single‐dose nasal spray (MDZ–NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs). METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390220) with patients age ≥12 years on a stable regimen of antiepileptic drugs. Following an in‐clinic test dose phase (TDP), patients entered an outpatient comparative phase (CP) and were randomized (2:1) to receive double‐blind MDZ–NS 5 mg or placebo nasal spray, administered by caregivers when they experienced an SC. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success (seizure termination within 10 minutes and no recurrence 10 minutes to 6 hours after trial drug administration). Secondary efficacy end points were proportion of patients with seizure recurrence 10 minutes to 4 hours, and time‐to‐next seizure >10 minutes after double‐blind drug administration. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: Of 292 patients administered a test dose, 262 patients were randomized, and 201 received double‐blind treatment for an SC (n = 134 MDZ–NS, n = 67 placebo, modified intent‐to‐treat population). A significantly greater proportion of MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients achieved treatment success (53.7% vs 34.4%; P = 0.0109). Significantly, fewer MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients experienced seizure recurrence (38.1% vs 59.7%; P = 0.0043). Time‐to‐next seizure analysis showed early separation (within 30 minutes) between MDZ–NS and placebo that was maintained throughout the 24‐hour observation period (21% difference at 24 hours; P = 0.0124). Sixteen patients (5.5%) discontinued because of a treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the TDP and none during the CP. During the CP, 27.6% and 22.4% of patients in the MDZ–NS and placebo groups, respectively, experienced ≥1 TEAE. SIGNIFICANCE: MDZ–NS was superior to placebo in providing rapid, sustained seizure control when administered to patients experiencing an SC in the outpatient setting and was associated with a favorable safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92911432022-07-20 Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial Detyniecki, Kamil Van Ess, Peter J. Sequeira, David J. Wheless, James W. Meng, Tze‐Chiang Pullman, William E. Epilepsia Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single‐dose nasal spray (MDZ–NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs). METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390220) with patients age ≥12 years on a stable regimen of antiepileptic drugs. Following an in‐clinic test dose phase (TDP), patients entered an outpatient comparative phase (CP) and were randomized (2:1) to receive double‐blind MDZ–NS 5 mg or placebo nasal spray, administered by caregivers when they experienced an SC. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success (seizure termination within 10 minutes and no recurrence 10 minutes to 6 hours after trial drug administration). Secondary efficacy end points were proportion of patients with seizure recurrence 10 minutes to 4 hours, and time‐to‐next seizure >10 minutes after double‐blind drug administration. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: Of 292 patients administered a test dose, 262 patients were randomized, and 201 received double‐blind treatment for an SC (n = 134 MDZ–NS, n = 67 placebo, modified intent‐to‐treat population). A significantly greater proportion of MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients achieved treatment success (53.7% vs 34.4%; P = 0.0109). Significantly, fewer MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients experienced seizure recurrence (38.1% vs 59.7%; P = 0.0043). Time‐to‐next seizure analysis showed early separation (within 30 minutes) between MDZ–NS and placebo that was maintained throughout the 24‐hour observation period (21% difference at 24 hours; P = 0.0124). Sixteen patients (5.5%) discontinued because of a treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the TDP and none during the CP. During the CP, 27.6% and 22.4% of patients in the MDZ–NS and placebo groups, respectively, experienced ≥1 TEAE. SIGNIFICANCE: MDZ–NS was superior to placebo in providing rapid, sustained seizure control when administered to patients experiencing an SC in the outpatient setting and was associated with a favorable safety profile. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-29 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9291143/ /pubmed/31140596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.15159 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Detyniecki, Kamil
Van Ess, Peter J.
Sequeira, David J.
Wheless, James W.
Meng, Tze‐Chiang
Pullman, William E.
Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
title Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
title_full Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
title_short Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
title_sort safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters—a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31140596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.15159
work_keys_str_mv AT detynieckikamil safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT vanesspeterj safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT sequeiradavidj safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT whelessjamesw safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT mengtzechiang safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT pullmanwilliame safetyandefficacyofmidazolamnasalsprayintheoutpatienttreatmentofpatientswithseizureclustersarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial