Cargando…

Fatigue after heart transplantation – a possible barrier to self‐efficacy

RATIONALE: Recovery after heart transplantation is challenging and many heart recipients struggle with various transplant‐related symptoms, side‐effects of immunosuppressive medications and mental challenges. Fatigue has been reported to be one of the most common and distressing symptoms after heart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almgren, Matilda, Lundqvist, Pia, Lennerling, Annette, Forsberg, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33369757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/scs.12951
_version_ 1784749087319392256
author Almgren, Matilda
Lundqvist, Pia
Lennerling, Annette
Forsberg, Anna
author_facet Almgren, Matilda
Lundqvist, Pia
Lennerling, Annette
Forsberg, Anna
author_sort Almgren, Matilda
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Recovery after heart transplantation is challenging and many heart recipients struggle with various transplant‐related symptoms, side‐effects of immunosuppressive medications and mental challenges. Fatigue has been reported to be one of the most common and distressing symptoms after heart transplantation and might therefore constitute a barrier to self‐efficacy, which acts as a moderator of self‐management. AIM: To explore the prevalence of fatigue and its relationship to self‐efficacy among heart recipients 1–5 years after transplantation. RESEARCH METHOD: An explorative cross‐sectional design, including 79 heart recipients due for follow‐up 1–5 years after transplantation. Three different self‐assessment instruments were employed; The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory‐19, Self‐efficacy for managing chronic disease 6‐Item Scale and The Postoperative Recovery Profile. ETHICAL APPROVAL: The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Board of Lund (Dnr. 2014/670‐14/10) with supplementary approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr. 2019‐02769). RESULTS: The reported levels of fatigue for the whole group were moderate in all dimensions of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory‐19, with highest ratings in the General Fatigue sub‐scale. Those most fatigued were the groups younger than 50 years; pretransplant treatment with Mechanical Circulatory Support; not recovered or had not returned to work. Self‐efficacy was associated with the sub‐dimensions Mental Fatigue (ρ = −0·.649) and Reduced Motivation (ρ = −0·617), which explained 40·1% of the variance when controlled for age and gender. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The small sample size constitutes a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: The moderate levels of fatigue reported indicate that it is not a widespread problem. However, for those suffering from severe fatigue it is a troublesome symptom that affects the recovery process and their ability to return to work. Efforts should be made to identify those troubled by fatigue to enable sufficient self‐management support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92911912022-07-20 Fatigue after heart transplantation – a possible barrier to self‐efficacy Almgren, Matilda Lundqvist, Pia Lennerling, Annette Forsberg, Anna Scand J Caring Sci Empirical Studies RATIONALE: Recovery after heart transplantation is challenging and many heart recipients struggle with various transplant‐related symptoms, side‐effects of immunosuppressive medications and mental challenges. Fatigue has been reported to be one of the most common and distressing symptoms after heart transplantation and might therefore constitute a barrier to self‐efficacy, which acts as a moderator of self‐management. AIM: To explore the prevalence of fatigue and its relationship to self‐efficacy among heart recipients 1–5 years after transplantation. RESEARCH METHOD: An explorative cross‐sectional design, including 79 heart recipients due for follow‐up 1–5 years after transplantation. Three different self‐assessment instruments were employed; The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory‐19, Self‐efficacy for managing chronic disease 6‐Item Scale and The Postoperative Recovery Profile. ETHICAL APPROVAL: The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Board of Lund (Dnr. 2014/670‐14/10) with supplementary approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr. 2019‐02769). RESULTS: The reported levels of fatigue for the whole group were moderate in all dimensions of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory‐19, with highest ratings in the General Fatigue sub‐scale. Those most fatigued were the groups younger than 50 years; pretransplant treatment with Mechanical Circulatory Support; not recovered or had not returned to work. Self‐efficacy was associated with the sub‐dimensions Mental Fatigue (ρ = −0·.649) and Reduced Motivation (ρ = −0·617), which explained 40·1% of the variance when controlled for age and gender. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The small sample size constitutes a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: The moderate levels of fatigue reported indicate that it is not a widespread problem. However, for those suffering from severe fatigue it is a troublesome symptom that affects the recovery process and their ability to return to work. Efforts should be made to identify those troubled by fatigue to enable sufficient self‐management support. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-28 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9291191/ /pubmed/33369757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/scs.12951 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic College of Caring Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Empirical Studies
Almgren, Matilda
Lundqvist, Pia
Lennerling, Annette
Forsberg, Anna
Fatigue after heart transplantation – a possible barrier to self‐efficacy
title Fatigue after heart transplantation – a possible barrier to self‐efficacy
title_full Fatigue after heart transplantation – a possible barrier to self‐efficacy
title_fullStr Fatigue after heart transplantation – a possible barrier to self‐efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Fatigue after heart transplantation – a possible barrier to self‐efficacy
title_short Fatigue after heart transplantation – a possible barrier to self‐efficacy
title_sort fatigue after heart transplantation – a possible barrier to self‐efficacy
topic Empirical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33369757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/scs.12951
work_keys_str_mv AT almgrenmatilda fatigueafterhearttransplantationapossiblebarriertoselfefficacy
AT lundqvistpia fatigueafterhearttransplantationapossiblebarriertoselfefficacy
AT lennerlingannette fatigueafterhearttransplantationapossiblebarriertoselfefficacy
AT forsberganna fatigueafterhearttransplantationapossiblebarriertoselfefficacy