Cargando…

Potential determinants of the E/e′ ratio in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients

AIM: We hypothesized that arterial function and N‐terminal natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels as a marker of volume overload, relate differently to E/e′ as an index of diastolic function in dialysis compared with non‐dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. We further examined whether card...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Hon‐Chun, Norton, Gavin R., Robinson, Chanel, Woodiwiss, Angela J., Dessein, Patrick H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34272789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nep.13948
_version_ 1784749092760453120
author Hsu, Hon‐Chun
Norton, Gavin R.
Robinson, Chanel
Woodiwiss, Angela J.
Dessein, Patrick H.
author_facet Hsu, Hon‐Chun
Norton, Gavin R.
Robinson, Chanel
Woodiwiss, Angela J.
Dessein, Patrick H.
author_sort Hsu, Hon‐Chun
collection PubMed
description AIM: We hypothesized that arterial function and N‐terminal natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels as a marker of volume overload, relate differently to E/e′ as an index of diastolic function in dialysis compared with non‐dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. We further examined whether cardiovascular risk factors attenuated these relationships. METHODS: We assessed cardiovascular risk factors and determined arterial function indices by applanation tonometry using SphygmoCor software and E/e′ by echocardiography in 103 (62 non‐dialysis and 41 dialysis) patients. RESULTS: In established confounder adjusted analysis, dialysis status impacted the pulse wave velocity‐E/e′ relationship (interaction p = .01) but not the NT‐proBNP level‐E/e′ association (interaction p = .1). Upon entering arterial function measures and NT‐proBNP levels simultaneously in regression models, arterial function measures were associated with E/e′ (p = .008 to .04) in non‐dialysis patients whereas NT‐proBNP levels were related to E/e′ in dialysis patients (p = .009 to .04). Bivariate associations were found between diabetes (p < .0001) and E/e′ in non‐dialysis patients, and haemoglobin concentrations and E/e′ (p = .02) in those on dialysis. Upon adjustment for diabetes in non‐dialysis patients, only central pulse pressure remained associated with E/e′ (p = .02); when haemoglobin concentrations were adjusted for in dialysis patients, NT‐proBNP levels were no longer associated with E/e′ (p = .2). In separate models, haemoglobin levels were associated with E/e′ independent of left ventricular mass index and preload and afterload measures (p = .02 to .03). CONCLUSION: The main determinants of E/e′ may differ in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients. These include arterial function and diabetes in non‐dialysis patients, and volume overload and anaemia in dialysis patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92912122022-07-20 Potential determinants of the E/e′ ratio in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients Hsu, Hon‐Chun Norton, Gavin R. Robinson, Chanel Woodiwiss, Angela J. Dessein, Patrick H. Nephrology (Carlton) Original Articles AIM: We hypothesized that arterial function and N‐terminal natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels as a marker of volume overload, relate differently to E/e′ as an index of diastolic function in dialysis compared with non‐dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. We further examined whether cardiovascular risk factors attenuated these relationships. METHODS: We assessed cardiovascular risk factors and determined arterial function indices by applanation tonometry using SphygmoCor software and E/e′ by echocardiography in 103 (62 non‐dialysis and 41 dialysis) patients. RESULTS: In established confounder adjusted analysis, dialysis status impacted the pulse wave velocity‐E/e′ relationship (interaction p = .01) but not the NT‐proBNP level‐E/e′ association (interaction p = .1). Upon entering arterial function measures and NT‐proBNP levels simultaneously in regression models, arterial function measures were associated with E/e′ (p = .008 to .04) in non‐dialysis patients whereas NT‐proBNP levels were related to E/e′ in dialysis patients (p = .009 to .04). Bivariate associations were found between diabetes (p < .0001) and E/e′ in non‐dialysis patients, and haemoglobin concentrations and E/e′ (p = .02) in those on dialysis. Upon adjustment for diabetes in non‐dialysis patients, only central pulse pressure remained associated with E/e′ (p = .02); when haemoglobin concentrations were adjusted for in dialysis patients, NT‐proBNP levels were no longer associated with E/e′ (p = .2). In separate models, haemoglobin levels were associated with E/e′ independent of left ventricular mass index and preload and afterload measures (p = .02 to .03). CONCLUSION: The main determinants of E/e′ may differ in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients. These include arterial function and diabetes in non‐dialysis patients, and volume overload and anaemia in dialysis patients. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-07-27 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9291212/ /pubmed/34272789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nep.13948 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Nephrology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hsu, Hon‐Chun
Norton, Gavin R.
Robinson, Chanel
Woodiwiss, Angela J.
Dessein, Patrick H.
Potential determinants of the E/e′ ratio in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients
title Potential determinants of the E/e′ ratio in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients
title_full Potential determinants of the E/e′ ratio in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients
title_fullStr Potential determinants of the E/e′ ratio in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients
title_full_unstemmed Potential determinants of the E/e′ ratio in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients
title_short Potential determinants of the E/e′ ratio in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients
title_sort potential determinants of the e/e′ ratio in non‐dialysis compared with dialysis patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34272789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nep.13948
work_keys_str_mv AT hsuhonchun potentialdeterminantsoftheeeratioinnondialysiscomparedwithdialysispatients
AT nortongavinr potentialdeterminantsoftheeeratioinnondialysiscomparedwithdialysispatients
AT robinsonchanel potentialdeterminantsoftheeeratioinnondialysiscomparedwithdialysispatients
AT woodiwissangelaj potentialdeterminantsoftheeeratioinnondialysiscomparedwithdialysispatients
AT desseinpatrickh potentialdeterminantsoftheeeratioinnondialysiscomparedwithdialysispatients