Cargando…

Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management

PURPOSE: To investigate the attitudes and understanding of optometrists in the UK and Ireland towards Digital Eye Strain (DES), and to examine related practice patterns. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was developed, covering attitude and understanding of DES, examination of patients who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Patrick A, Wolffsohn, James S, Sheppard, Amy L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12887
_version_ 1784749160077983744
author Moore, Patrick A
Wolffsohn, James S
Sheppard, Amy L
author_facet Moore, Patrick A
Wolffsohn, James S
Sheppard, Amy L
author_sort Moore, Patrick A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the attitudes and understanding of optometrists in the UK and Ireland towards Digital Eye Strain (DES), and to examine related practice patterns. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was developed, covering attitude and understanding of DES, examination of patients who may be experiencing DES and approaches to management options. The questionnaire was promoted to UK and Ireland optometrists via professional bodies and local and area optometric committees. RESULTS: 406 responses were included in the analysis. Most respondents agreed that DES was an important concern for optometrists (88.9%). 91.4% reported they felt confident in discussing possible symptoms of DES and management options; this was weakly and negatively associated with number of years qualified (r (s) = −0.198, p ≤ 0.001). Estimations of the proportion of patients affected by DES were lower than reports in the literature (median 25%, IQR 10%–50%). Most respondents always (60.6%) or frequently (21.9%) inquired about device usage in routine case history taking, and also asked follow‐up questions, although 29.3% only asked about the presence of symptoms half the time or less. Advising on regular breaks (84.0%), lubricants (55.7%) and environment/set up (69.2%) were felt to be extremely or very important by most respondents. Advising on specialist spectacle lenses, specifically blue filtering designs, was considered extremely or very important by 34.2% and 15.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Given the agreement that DES is a significant issue causing frequent and persistent symptoms, and practitioners reported high levels of confidence in discussing DES, patients can expect to receive advice on symptoms and management from their optometrist. Simple management strategies were felt to be most important to advise on, with more uncertainty linked to specialist spectacle lenses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92915432022-07-20 Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management Moore, Patrick A Wolffsohn, James S Sheppard, Amy L Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Original Articles PURPOSE: To investigate the attitudes and understanding of optometrists in the UK and Ireland towards Digital Eye Strain (DES), and to examine related practice patterns. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was developed, covering attitude and understanding of DES, examination of patients who may be experiencing DES and approaches to management options. The questionnaire was promoted to UK and Ireland optometrists via professional bodies and local and area optometric committees. RESULTS: 406 responses were included in the analysis. Most respondents agreed that DES was an important concern for optometrists (88.9%). 91.4% reported they felt confident in discussing possible symptoms of DES and management options; this was weakly and negatively associated with number of years qualified (r (s) = −0.198, p ≤ 0.001). Estimations of the proportion of patients affected by DES were lower than reports in the literature (median 25%, IQR 10%–50%). Most respondents always (60.6%) or frequently (21.9%) inquired about device usage in routine case history taking, and also asked follow‐up questions, although 29.3% only asked about the presence of symptoms half the time or less. Advising on regular breaks (84.0%), lubricants (55.7%) and environment/set up (69.2%) were felt to be extremely or very important by most respondents. Advising on specialist spectacle lenses, specifically blue filtering designs, was considered extremely or very important by 34.2% and 15.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Given the agreement that DES is a significant issue causing frequent and persistent symptoms, and practitioners reported high levels of confidence in discussing DES, patients can expect to receive advice on symptoms and management from their optometrist. Simple management strategies were felt to be most important to advise on, with more uncertainty linked to specialist spectacle lenses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-21 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9291543/ /pubmed/34545597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12887 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Moore, Patrick A
Wolffsohn, James S
Sheppard, Amy L
Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management
title Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management
title_full Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management
title_fullStr Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management
title_short Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management
title_sort attitudes of optometrists in the uk and ireland to digital eye strain and approaches to assessment and management
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12887
work_keys_str_mv AT moorepatricka attitudesofoptometristsintheukandirelandtodigitaleyestrainandapproachestoassessmentandmanagement
AT wolffsohnjamess attitudesofoptometristsintheukandirelandtodigitaleyestrainandapproachestoassessmentandmanagement
AT sheppardamyl attitudesofoptometristsintheukandirelandtodigitaleyestrainandapproachestoassessmentandmanagement