Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of the CN‐6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays

BACKGROUND: The CN‐6000 (Sysmex Corp.) is a new haemostasis analyser with blood coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) capabilities. Transmitted light is monitored at multiple wavelengths (340, 405, 575, 660, 800 nm), from an LED light source. AIMS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gardiner, Chris, Lane, Philip, Langley, Katy, Tailor, Hitesh, Machin, Samuel J., Mackie, Ian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13271
_version_ 1784749164056281088
author Gardiner, Chris
Lane, Philip
Langley, Katy
Tailor, Hitesh
Machin, Samuel J.
Mackie, Ian J.
author_facet Gardiner, Chris
Lane, Philip
Langley, Katy
Tailor, Hitesh
Machin, Samuel J.
Mackie, Ian J.
author_sort Gardiner, Chris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The CN‐6000 (Sysmex Corp.) is a new haemostasis analyser with blood coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) capabilities. Transmitted light is monitored at multiple wavelengths (340, 405, 575, 660, 800 nm), from an LED light source. AIMS: To evaluate the performance of the CN‐6000 against a predicate device. METHODS: The CN‐6000 was evaluated against the CS‐5100 (Sysmex) for 14 different tests, using 880 samples from normal subjects, anticoagulated patients, critically ill patients, plasmas with high or low fibrinogen content or abnormal levels of interfering substances. Between‐day assay imprecision was assessed using commercial QC materials (n = 10 replicates on each of 5 days). RESULTS: Acceptable levels of imprecision were obtained for all assays. Agreement between the two analysers was excellent for all assays. Throughput was 35% higher using the CN‐6000 (337 vs 250 tests per hour for PT, aPTT and fibrinogen). The CN‐6000 also demonstrated improved clot detection in plasmas with high levels of interfering substances as demonstrated by a 29% reduction in “vote‐outs” due to low light transmission (24 vs 34). CONCLUSIONS: The CN‐6000 demonstrated excellent comparability with the predicate instrument and acceptable levels of imprecision in all assays. Improvements in throughput and clot detection in the presence of interfering substances were also shown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92915592022-07-20 A comparative evaluation of the CN‐6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays Gardiner, Chris Lane, Philip Langley, Katy Tailor, Hitesh Machin, Samuel J. Mackie, Ian J. Int J Lab Hematol ORIGINAL ARTICLES BACKGROUND: The CN‐6000 (Sysmex Corp.) is a new haemostasis analyser with blood coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) capabilities. Transmitted light is monitored at multiple wavelengths (340, 405, 575, 660, 800 nm), from an LED light source. AIMS: To evaluate the performance of the CN‐6000 against a predicate device. METHODS: The CN‐6000 was evaluated against the CS‐5100 (Sysmex) for 14 different tests, using 880 samples from normal subjects, anticoagulated patients, critically ill patients, plasmas with high or low fibrinogen content or abnormal levels of interfering substances. Between‐day assay imprecision was assessed using commercial QC materials (n = 10 replicates on each of 5 days). RESULTS: Acceptable levels of imprecision were obtained for all assays. Agreement between the two analysers was excellent for all assays. Throughput was 35% higher using the CN‐6000 (337 vs 250 tests per hour for PT, aPTT and fibrinogen). The CN‐6000 also demonstrated improved clot detection in plasmas with high levels of interfering substances as demonstrated by a 29% reduction in “vote‐outs” due to low light transmission (24 vs 34). CONCLUSIONS: The CN‐6000 demonstrated excellent comparability with the predicate instrument and acceptable levels of imprecision in all assays. Improvements in throughput and clot detection in the presence of interfering substances were also shown. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-17 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9291559/ /pubmed/32885901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13271 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Gardiner, Chris
Lane, Philip
Langley, Katy
Tailor, Hitesh
Machin, Samuel J.
Mackie, Ian J.
A comparative evaluation of the CN‐6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays
title A comparative evaluation of the CN‐6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays
title_full A comparative evaluation of the CN‐6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of the CN‐6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of the CN‐6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays
title_short A comparative evaluation of the CN‐6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays
title_sort comparative evaluation of the cn‐6000 haemostasis analyser using coagulation, amidolytic, immuno‐turbidometric and light transmission aggregometry assays
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13271
work_keys_str_mv AT gardinerchris acomparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT lanephilip acomparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT langleykaty acomparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT tailorhitesh acomparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT machinsamuelj acomparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT mackieianj acomparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT gardinerchris comparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT lanephilip comparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT langleykaty comparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT tailorhitesh comparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT machinsamuelj comparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays
AT mackieianj comparativeevaluationofthecn6000haemostasisanalyserusingcoagulationamidolyticimmunoturbidometricandlighttransmissionaggregometryassays